Soy another contradicting and hypocritical video

[catfishman23]

things like this




and this




then tries to disregard the 80/20 rule


then literally through the video wants you to project your confidence.

i had enough im going to unclick the recommendation off this dude.

im done.

holy shit how can mgtow guys cope like this.

 

[NoMoreSlaving]

He's just manipulating low IQ mgtow copers into watching his bullshit (which he 100% knows is bullshit)

 

[FukkenLoser]

He has it all confused. 80/20 a valid, well analyzed theory does not mean Sub-8 theory. Attractiveness is, like most things, on a normal distribution curve, pictured below.

This means that people above 8 on the attractiveness scale are like 5-8% of the people. All men above 6.5 are in the top 20%. Not sub-8s, Sub8s is a massive fucking misunderstanding of statistics.

 

[catfishman23]

He has it all confused. 80/20 a valid, well analyzed theory does not mean Sub-8 theory. Attractiveness is, like most things, on a normal distribution curve, pictured below.

This means that people above 8 on the attractiveness scale are like 5-8% of the people. All men above 6.5 are in the top 20%. Not sub-8s, Sub8s is a massive fucking misunderstanding of statistics.

its not 6.5 my friend.

 

[FukkenLoser]

He has it all confused. 80/20 a valid, well analyzed theory does not mean Sub-8 theory. Attractiveness is, like most things, on a normal distribution curve, pictured below.

This means that people above 8 on the attractiveness scale are like 5-8% of the people. All men above 6.5 are in the top 20%. Not sub-8s, Sub8s is a massive fucking misunderstanding of statistics.

Which is why he said 6s, 7s, and 8s do the best, not because they are the best, but because there are more of them and they meet the looks prerequisite.

 

[catfishman23]

Which is why he said 6s, 7s, and 8s do the best, not because they are the best, but because there are more of them and they meet the looks prerequisite.

no, female standards got literally higher.

its mostly 7.5's and above

 

[FukkenLoser]

its not 6.5 my friend.

It is, people on this site way overrate themselves and other men.

This is a 6.5, maybe even less

 

[catfishman23]

It is, people on this site way overrate themselves and other men.

This is a 6.5, maybe even less

lol ok talk to a guy who was rated a 9.4 10 years ago

now using the same picture on photofeeler the pic got a 6.9

 

[FukkenLoser]

lol ok talk to a guy who was rated a 9.4 10 years ago

now using the same picture on photofeeler the pic got a 6.9

Photofeeler is actuall nonsense, I get drastically different ratings with pictures of the same person. People on there are rating the quality of the picture, not the quality of the subject.

Arent you not even an incel? You're just a blackpilled normie, which makes sense because you were about a 6.3 according to women. That's why you probably got sex.

 

[catfishman23]

Photofeeler is actuall nonsense, I get drastically different ratings with pictures of the same person. People on there are rating the quality of the picture, not the quality of the subject.

Arent you not even an incel? You're just a blackpilled normie, which makes sense because you were about a 6.3 according to women. That's why you probably got sex.

yea the hotornot rating was actually legit some odd years ago, nice wAy to cope that sub 8 men dont exist.

im incel due to female hypergamy and standards.

 

[TheRealChincel]

I’d say that 1% of guys are 8s and 5% are 7s. Don’t know how anyone can think 20% of guys are good-looking.

 

[drivebyartist]

when put into an attractive person's shoes, it's very easy to pass off certain techniques as apart of the metaphorical 'key' to the initiation of relationships no matter how false they actually are.