A Christian Perspective on Sex

[four1298]

The Bible says it's harder for the rich to enter the kingdom of Heaven than it is for a camel to go through the eye of the needle. The sexual version of this is that the top of women who have the most sex, the Stacies, will not enter the kingdom of Heaven. What Jesus said was to give all your possessions away to the poor. The sexual version of this command is that women have to give their bodies to sexually destitute men. Only then, in my opinion, can they enter the kingdom. Indeed, The Bible says, "And so it turned out that not a person among them was needy. Those who owned fields or houses sold them and brought the price of the sale to the apostles and made an offering of it. The apostles then distributed it according to each person’s need"(emphasis is mine). Men should have their sexual needs met.

What this system is is sexual communism. In another thread, I already defended prostitution based on what Jesus said and did.

@Old Ironsides I'm pinging you because I know you're a Christmaxxer. What are your thoughts on this?

 

[deleted fren]

Interesting.

 

[aryanmikmaq]

I mean I think he has more mercy on us but the Bible is cleary against prostitution and sex before marriage. But I agree he does want marriages to be equally distributed like sexual communism yeah.

 

[Icarus]

Dnr

 

[WastedPotential]

The Bible says it's harder for the rich to enter the kingdom of Heaven than it is for a camel to go through the eye of the needle. The sexual version of this is that the top of women, the Stacies, will not enter the kingdom of Heaven. What Jesus said was to give all your possessions away to the poor. The sexual version of this command is that women have to give their bodies to sexually destitute men. Only then, in my opinion, can they enter the kingdom. Indeed, The Bible says, "And so it turned out that not a person among them was needy. Those who owned fields or houses sold them and brought the price of the sale to the apostles and made an offering of it. The apostles then distributed it according to each person’s need"(emphasis is mine). Men should have their sexual needs met.

What this system is is sexual communism. In another thread, I already defended prostitution based on what Jesus said and did.

@Old Ironsides I'm pinging you because I know you're a Christmaxxer. What are your thoughts on this?

I'm pretty nihilistic about christendom,
i've found that most christians just selectively pick the quotes from the bible that appeal/speak to them, and even then everybody interprets it in their own way. Whilst it might be easier to speak to a christian by quoting stuff from the bible, ultimately I think they don't really care in the end and will just pretend to care/understand.

Still a based quote though.

 

[four1298]

I mean I think he has more mercy on us but the Bible is cleary against prostitution and sex before marriage. But I agree he does want marriages to be equally distributed like sexual communism yeah.

I'm going to repeat what I said in the link I provided. If he's against prostitution why did he say prostitutes and tax collectors will enter the kingdom of Heaven before you? He also forgave a prostitute's sins.

 

[H8mychudlife]

Coping with some book elites made 2000 years ago to keep the goyim docile

 

[aryanmikmaq]

I'm going to repeat what I said in the link I provided. If he's against prostitution why did he say prostitutes and tax collectors will enter the kingdom of Heaven before you? He also forgave a prostitute's sins.

Because he forgave their sins lol. They felt remorse for their actions. Acting like all prostitutes are automatically forgiven is fucking braindead. You are misinterpreting the Bible by simping for whores who would only fuck you for money lmao. He is basically saying low level sinners have a higher chance of heaven than high level ones.

 

[DeliriousMerchant]

Dnr

 

[FBI]

Interesting take, but I am not religious and I have never studied the Bible in depth, so correct me if I am wrong: I think Christ's command to give away wealth was less about material redistribution and more about detachment from possessions and pride, freeing oneself from greed so as to devote fully to God. Applying that directly to sex with the idea that women should give themselves to men because men "need" it misses the point, since it treats sex as another worldly transaction, when the teaching itself was about rejecting worldly attachments altogether.

 

[four1298]

Interesting take, but I am not religious and I have never studied the Bible in depth, so correct me if I am wrong: I think Christ's command to give away wealth was less about material redistribution and more about detachment from possessions and pride, freeing oneself from greed so as to devote fully to God. Applying that directly to sex with the idea that women should give themselves to men because men "need" it misses the point, since it treats sex as another worldly transaction, when the teaching itself was about rejecting worldly attachments altogether.

If it's not about need why does it literally use the word "need?" I bolded that word in the OP. And why did God say this?:

For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

...
"The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

(I should've included this quote in the OP too).

If it's not about need he would've just said abandon your belongings or trash them.

 

[FBI]

If it's not about need why does it literally use the word "need?" I bolded that word in the OP. And why did God say this?:


(I should've included this quote in the OP too).

If it's not about need he would've just said abandon your belongings or trash them.

I think there is a difference between need in the sense of sustenance and need in the sense of desire. Feeding the hungry or clothing the poor is about survival itself, about acts of mercy toward those who literally cannot live without help. Sex is not in that category. A man may feel miserable or even hopeless without it, but he does not starve or freeze. That is why applying those verses to sex does not really work. Christ's teaching on wealth and charity was about meeting necessities of life and removing the pride of ownership, not about satisfying every human craving.

 

[four1298]

I think there is a difference between need in the sense of sustenance and need in the sense of desire. Feeding the hungry or clothing the poor is about survival itself, about acts of mercy toward those who literally cannot live without help. Sex is not in that category. A man may feel miserable or even hopeless without it, but he does not starve or freeze. That is why applying those verses to sex does not really work. Christ's teaching on wealth and charity was about meeting necessities of life and removing the pride of ownership, not about satisfying every human craving.

So you're saying you're against the idea that sex is a basic human need and right which is one of the top beliefs of this forum. I already made a thread explaining why sex is a basic need. Look at this forum for instance. Many suicide posts. And this forum is owned by the same who runs Sanctioned Suicide. Inceldom has caused much suicide. Sex is not a want, it's a need.

 

[FBI]

So you're saying you're against the idea that sex is a basic human need and right which is one of the top beliefs of this forum. I already made a thread explaining why sex is a basic need. Look at this forum for instance. Many suicide posts. And this forum is owned by the same who runs Sanctioned Suicide. Inceldom has caused much suicide. Sex is not a want, it's a need.

I would not call sex a basic need in the same way food, water, and shelter are. Without those, a person dies within days or weeks. Without sex, a person may suffer emotionally, even unbearably, but he still lives.

 

[four1298]

Acting like all prostitutes are automatically forgiven is fucking braindead.

I don't think prostitution is a sin.

You are misinterpreting the Bible by simping for whores who would only fuck you for money lmao.

Being pro-prostitution is not simping. Read this thread that debunks your thought process:

There is a HUGE difference between simps and men who use legal prostitutes and strip clubs

If you are going to pay a foid, make sure they do something for you personally. If you pay for lap dances at a strip club or legal prostitutes you are not a simp, you are paying for favors/services that they provide you. They are working for you for your money. I go to a bikini Barista. Pretty...

incels.is

 

[aryanmikmaq]

I don't think prostitution is a sin.


Being pro-prostitution is not simping. Read this thread that debunks your thought process:

There is a HUGE difference between simps and men who use legal prostitutes and strip clubs

If you are going to pay a foid, make sure they do something for you personally. If you pay for lap dances at a strip club or legal prostitutes you are not a simp, you are paying for favors/services that they provide you. They are working for you for your money. I go to a bikini Barista. Pretty...

incels.is

You are missing my point. In a theoretical society where men could all get married and women had no rights and you still supported prostitution in that society you would be a total simp. You would only not be a simp in this society because men have to settle for less to even get a sprinkle of affection from foids. And yes it’s a sin.

1 Corinthians 6:18

Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition

​

18 Fly fornication. Every sin that a man doth, is without the body; but he that committeth fornication, sinneth against his own body.

Doesn’t mean I am hating on struggling men it’s not their fault society is like this but it’s still a sin according to the Bible. It’s a form of fornication. I might get a hooker myself one day I’m not perfect. Doesn’t change it’s a sin.