Consensual Cannibalism Should be Legal

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

Obviously murder should still be illegal, and killing someone to eat them would constitute murder.

But if I agree that one is free to eat my body after my death, and one agrees to eat my body, there is no reason that should be illegal.

In fact, with full consent, it should be fully legal for one to allow someone else to euthanize and eat them. If I am entitled to my own body, I should be allowed to contract it out for any purpose whatsoever.

In the words of toilets: "my body, my choice!"

 

[Emba]

I'm sour and bitter and tough and stringy

 

[naizuri]

necrophilia seems more reasonable

 

[sk.feelsdevil]

Your issue should be with abrahamic traditions. This whole "do not destroy the body" came from them.

 

[Zer0/∞]

how to start Covid 3.0

 

[DeathSigil]

necrophilia seems more reasonable

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

how to start Covid 3.0

Human meat is relatively safe

 

[Moth Knight]

Human meat is relatively safe

Except for the brain, you don't wanna get kuru

 

[Moth Knight]

Your issue should be with abrahamic traditions. This whole "do not destroy the body" came from them.

It really does feel like every arbitrary rule and societal issue can be traced back to Abrahamic doctrine, very interesting.

 

[Hoor Al-Ayn]

Except for the brain, you don't wanna get kuru

true, but I think Kuru might have been endemic, since to my knowledge it's never been found outside of papua
(but I guess there's not enough global cannibals to test that)

 

[Moth Knight]

Obviously murder should still be illegal, and killing someone to eat them would constitute murder.

But if I agree that one is free to eat my body after my death, and one agrees to eat my body, there is no reason that should be illegal.

In fact, with full consent, it should be fully legal for one to allow someone else to euthanize and eat them. If I am entitled to my own body, I should be allowed to contract it out for any purpose whatsoever.

In the words of toilets: "my body, my choice!"

It is, there are no laws against cannibalism in the UK and US provided that you don't kill anyone and you had consent from the person who you're eating before they died (for example if they stated they were ok with being cannibalised in their will.

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

Except for the brain, you don't wanna get kuru

Yeah obviously that, and Prions, but I mean like the regular flesh

It is, there are no laws against cannibalism in the UK and US provided that you don't kill anyone and you had consent from the person who you're eating before they died (for example if they stated they were ok with being cannibalised in their will.

Is discretion of a corpse not illegal? If so UK is awesome.

 

[Vilsonicvs]

You'd have to commit suicide/let someone kill you(ie: suicide) to be eaten, so I think this debate simply boils down to whether suicide is immoral or not. why do you think suicide is not immoral? what is your system of ethics?

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

You'd have to commit suicide/let someone kill you(ie: suicide) to be eaten

Not true, you could have an agreement that if you were to die of natural or accidental causes, then you can be eaten, much like life insurance.

, so I think this debate simply boils down to whether suicide is immoral or not. why do you think suicide is not immoral? what is your system of ethics?

I actually think suicide is extremely moral. I am a Utilitarian and a Hedonist.

 

[Vilsonicvs]

Not true, you could have an agreement that if you were to die of natural or accidental causes, then you can be eaten, much like life insurance.

yeah I didn't think of that, in that case I don't think there'd be any problem morally, pretty weird but not immoral

I actually think suicide is extremely moral. I am a Utilitarian and a Hedonist.

how can you justify suicide as a utilitarian? it often causes much more pain and makes it worse for everyone else

 

[Defetivecuckachu]

Finally, "eat my ass" has real meaning.

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

yeah I didn't think of that, in that case I don't think there'd be any problem morally, pretty weird but not immoral

how can you justify suicide as a utilitarian? it often causes much more pain and makes it worse for everyone else

If the individual wants to die, the harm that they experience by continuing to live is far greater than the sadness of others.

Imagine a suicidal quadriplegic whos bedbound. EVeryday is him suffering in immense emotional pain. What's worse, him being forced to live, or his family sad they can't keep the rotten corpose alive longer?

 

[Emerald]

You could argue anything is ok if it’s “consensual”, necrophilia can be consensual (before the person dies they consent), mother son incest can be consensual. There’s still grounds of immorality outside of the consent aspect, and there’s usually just a general disdain and aversion to such acts that are hardwired in us. Only barbaric savages eat human meat, and almost any civilization in history has condemned cannibalism

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

You could argue anything is ok if it’s “consensual”, necrophilia can be consensual (before the person dies they consent), mother son incest can be consensual.

Exactly. Only barbaric socialist Statists consider something consenual to be immoral.

There’s still grounds of immorality outside of the consent aspect, and there’s usually just a general disdain and aversion to such acts that are hardwired in us. Only barbaric savages eat human meat, and almost any civilization in history has condemned cannibalism

By definition people who define consensual acts as immoral are not civilized, they may be tecnhologically advanced, but they're still underdeveloped moral savages.

Your own logic could be used to argue Necrophilia and Fetishes are immoral.

 

[Emerald]

Your own logic could be used to argue Necrophilia and Fetishes are immoral

That is what I’m arguing, I’m saying consent doesn’t justify the morality of something. Some acts will be disgustingly regardless, and imo that includes cannibalism.

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

That is what I’m arguing, I’m saying consent doesn’t justify the morality of something

It does, I'm literally saying nothing wrong with necrophilia or cannibalism

. Some acts will be disgustingly regardless, and imo that includes cannibalism.

Then I will argue that pizza eaters and pizza makers are immoral and evil, and people who don't use Bidets are evil. Pizza is insanely disgusting and I've called people who eat it disgusting but I haven't associated that with immorality. However I would like to use this line of arguments because I do think pizza shops are gross for unconsenually clouding my nostrils with their filth.

 

[Emerald]

It does, I'm literally saying nothing wrong with necrophilia or cannibalism

Yeah having sex with a rotting corpse full of maggots is totally normal

Then I will argue that pizza eaters and pizza makers are immoral and evil, and people who don't use Bidets are evil. Pizza is insanely disgusting and I've called people who eat it disgusting but I haven't associated that with immorality. However I would like to use this line of arguments because I do think pizza shops are gross for unconsenually clouding my nostrils with their filth

Except that line of reasoning doesn’t hold up, cannibalism is just objectively wrong, our laws tell us this, and most religions tell us this. Your parents don’t have to tell you eating others is wrong. It is instinctually for humans to have certain morals, and those morals must be followed. Pizza eating i: justified because it comes from animals society has deemed ok to eat. Society has never deemed cannibalism ok (except in small groups like religious cults or remote tribes). You can think however you want, but the masses will say cannibalism is wrong, and always will

 

[jungfraucel]

just like this german guy who ate some dude's dick after putting up an ad online https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armin_Meiwes
the cannibal of Rothenburg

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

Yeah having sex with a rotting corpse full of maggots is totally normal

Yes, because having sex with a rotting corpse is totally the same thing as the Holocaust.

Except that line of reasoning doesn’t hold up, cannibalism is just objectively wrong,

There’s objectively nothing wrong with it

our laws tell us this, and most religions tell us this.

Our laws and religions are objectively wrong and false

Your parents don’t have to tell you eating others is wrong. It is instinctually for humans to have certain morals

Humans instinctually turn to racism and tribalism, by that logic those are ok

, and those morals must be followed. Pizza eating i: justified because it comes from animals society has deemed ok to eat.

That just proves society is messed up.

Society has never deemed cannibalism ok (except in small groups like religious cults or remote tribes). You can think however you want, but the masses will say cannibalism is wrong, and always will

And that’s exactly why the Masses need to be conditioned different

 

[Uncle Death]

I want to eat someone

 

[Skelly]

What’s stopping me from killing and then eating you, and claiming that it was consensual cannibalism?
I could forge documents that you consented and it’s basically legal murder

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

What’s stopping me from killing and then eating you, and claiming that it was consensual cannibalism?
I could forge documents that you consented and it’s basically legal murder

Murder laws, same things that stop you from just euthanizing a random person in places where euthanasia is legal.

 

[four1298]

Cannibalism seems to go against Christianity. You're supposed to bury the dead, not cremate them or eat them. Nowhere in The Bible does it say to eat the dead.

What about Catholic Cremation?

The Catholic Church on cremation of bodies - What People Are Asking

www.traditioninaction.org

When a just man dies, his soul goes to Heaven and enjoys happiness. However, this happiness is incomplete until his body resurrects and joins his soul.

...

Therefore, the body that dies is very important. It must be resurrected in order to complete the image and likeness of God which that person represents.

...

Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, on whom we model ourselves, was laid in the tomb and rose again.

Also atheist Richard Dawkins supports cannibalism:

Dawkins Wants to Eat Human ‘Meat’ | National Review

Researchers may soon be able to manufacture meat from cell lines in the lab, and Dawkins has suggested in a tweet that we could “overcome our taboo.”

www.nationalreview.com

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

Cannibalism seems to go against Christianity. You're supposed to bury the dead, not cremate them or eat them. Nowhere in The Bible does it say to eat the dead.

What about Catholic Cremation?

The Catholic Church on cremation of bodies - What People Are Asking

www.traditioninaction.org

Also atheist Richard Dawkins supports cannibalism:

Dawkins Wants to Eat Human ‘Meat’ | National Review

Researchers may soon be able to manufacture meat from cell lines in the lab, and Dawkins has suggested in a tweet that we could “overcome our taboo.”

www.nationalreview.com

I have written about this before. As much as I am Catholic, this issue, euthanaisa , and prositution are the ones I have the most contention witb

 

[four1298]

I have written about this before. As much as I am Catholic, this issue, euthanaisa , and prositution are the ones I have the most contention witb

I think Christianity is compatible with prostitution. Matthew 21:31 says prostitutes and tax collectors will enter the kingdom of Heaven before you. This logically includes Johns too. Luke 15:7 says, "there’s more joy in heaven over one sinner’s rescued life than over ninety-nine good people in no need of rescue." The takeaway from this is that we should sin a lot so that God has more joy when we repent. I don't even consider prostitution a sin though. Jesus Christ also said in Luke 7:41-42 “Two men were in debt to a banker. One owed five hundred silver pieces, the other fifty. Neither of them could pay up, and so the banker canceled both debts. Which of the two would be more grateful?” We should sin more so we're more grateful of God's forgiveness. In that chapter, Jesus forgave the sins of a prostitute with expensive perfume IIRC. Perhaps Jesus was a John.

 

[four1298]

Why do you care so much about cannibalism? There's no reason to want to eat a human.

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

Why do you care so much about cannibalism? There's no reason to want to eat a human.

There’s no reason to be want to eat pizza, mixed foods, put spices on foods, normies do all that

 

[Sewer Koala]

Your issue should be with abrahamic traditions. This whole "do not destroy the body" came from them.

wdym, kikes spawnkill their children's foreskin

 

[Lonely Slav]

You're so edgy, dude.

 

[fukurou]

it already is, it's called organ transplants.

 

[sk.feelsdevil]

wdym, kikes spawnkill their children's foreskin

abrahamic =/= jewish
The religious category of abrahamic religions contains judaism, but is not limited to them. Christcuckery, Islam and Mormonism too belong to this group of religions. And you are correct they do actually destroy their own bodies through the cutting of the foreskin, but from their own perspective it is just a physical signifier for the deal Abraham made with Yahweh or some cope about hygene. Mind you not all abrahamics mutilate dicks, othopedos don't do this shit.

 

[Sewer Koala]

abrahamic =/= jewish
The religious category of abrahamic religions contains judaism, but is not limited to them. Christcuckery, Islam and Mormonism too belong to this group of religions. And you are correct they do actually destroy their own bodies through the cutting of the foreskin, but from their own perspective it is just a physical signifier for the deal Abraham made with Yahweh or some cope about hygene. Mind you not all abrahamics mutilate dicks, othopedos don't do this shit.

islam does even though it's optional. you're right with christianism tho. now, what idk about is mormonism, i don't know that much about them tbh.

 

[Regenerator]

 

[Albertopenheimer]

necrophilia seems more reasonable

also

 

[Pikacel]

Obviously murder should still be illegal, and killing someone to eat them would constitute murder.

But if I agree that one is free to eat my body after my death, and one agrees to eat my body, there is no reason that should be illegal.

In fact, with full consent, it should be fully legal for one to allow someone else to euthanize and eat them. If I am entitled to my own body, I should be allowed to contract it out for any purpose whatsoever.

In the words of toilets: "my body, my choice!

Are you Hutu or Congolese by any chance

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

You're so edgy, dude.

Omg you’re such a normie dude, tell us more how normie you are

 

[Moth Knight]

Obviously murder should still be illegal, and killing someone to eat them would constitute murder.

But if I agree that one is free to eat my body after my death, and one agrees to eat my body, there is no reason that should be illegal.

In fact, with full consent, it should be fully legal for one to allow someone else to euthanize and eat them. If I am entitled to my own body, I should be allowed to contract it out for any purpose whatsoever.

In the words of toilets: "my body, my choice!"

That's already legal in many states in the US.

 

[ALifeWastedOnRot]

That's already legal in many states in the US.

I don’t believe it is due to disecretion of a body laws