Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

NSFW 2019 user ThinTinyDickCel can ascend with his chubby sister if we help him

Sheogorath

Sheogorath

Visionary
★★★★★
Joined
May 20, 2018
Posts
20,638
10% shitposting in ID - Moved to lounge
they're jogging together
she is chubby

Pai Fella


basically they are already doing fitness stuff together so he should convince her that doing sexual stuff will help her drop pounds
 
@ThinTinyDickCel
Thin
 
Shit’s nasty
 
Don't contribute to degeneracy, we should be better than that. Women are naturally degenerate but that's because they're not on the same level of sentience and sophistication as us. I don't even consider women to be human beings even if they objectively are
 
Don't contribute to degeneracy, we should be better than that. Women are naturally degenerate but that's because they're not on the same level of sentience and sophistication as us. I don't even consider women to be human beings even if they objectively are
Dude, there's no moral high ground. here we're the lowest of the low and nothing can change that. Degeneracy is an intricate part of our species, and we should treasure it. Incest is Wincest after all.
 
I went jogging with her once and she doesn't want to go anymore that lazy fatass
 
There is nothing degenerate about fucking your sister.
iu



See entry 2.2.

You have a moral argument to make for why incest is morally good/permissible. You should define your moral framework first.

I'm starting to think you're pro-globohomo.
 
Last edited:
No. You want him to go to jail?
 
my old account got banned for making a nigger facts thread (Heightframeface. 3 years ago, and the mod who banned me is gone now). i remember you complained about being a balding ethnicel (middle-eastern, i think).
Yeah I remember you as well lol. You still rotting or working on ascension?
 
You have a moral argument to make for why incest is morally good/permissible. You should define your moral framework first.
I'm starting to think you're pro-globohomo.
I am going to address the MW def you cited:
"having declined or become less specialized (as in nature, character, structure, or function) from an ancestral or former state"

Why would becoming "less specialized" be a 'decline' ? Specialization (losing capacity to do other things) is only useful if it makes you better at your specialty.

Also even if "I will fuck any woman including my sister" is "less specialized" than "I will fuck any woman except my sister", something like "I will ONLY fuck my sister" is infinitely more specialized than "I will fuck 2+ women"

So you can't rightly argue that specialization is a basis to exclude incest.
 
I am going to address the MW def you cited:
"having declined or become less specialized (as in nature, character, structure, or function) from an ancestral or former state"

Why would becoming "less specialized" be a 'decline' ? Specialization (losing capacity to do other things) is only useful if it makes you better at your specialty.

Also even if "I will fuck any woman including my sister" is "less specialized" than "I will fuck any woman except my sister", something like "I will ONLY fuck my sister" is infinitely more specialized than "I will fuck 2+ women"

So you can't rightly argue that specialization is a basis to exclude incest.
Don't play stupid games, brocel. We both know you're setting up a strawman to attack and deflect from addressing the moral argument. I specifically was referring to entry 2.2, where the definition applies in this context.
 
I specifically was referring to entry 2.2, where the definition applies in this context.
maybe that's what you intended but you weren't specific so quote plz
 
Entry 2.2:
-"to sink into a low intellectual or moral state"

Okay, so you are making the argument that it is degenerate to make love with your sister because it involves sinking into a lower moral state?

I guess I wonder first: why is the burden for me to prove that this is high-morality instead of for you to prove it is low-morality?
 
I guess I wonder first: why is the burden for me to prove that this is high-morality instead of for you to prove it is low-morality?
I knew you'd play this card to find an out.

I'll tell you what. You make your arguments for why it's moral good/acceptable/permissible, and then I'll make mine for why it's morally bad/unacceptable/impermissible.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top