Your daily reminder that "Personality = Looks" has been scientifically proven

[saddupbro]

We've got data!   And a graph!

Lookism is the law of the land.

The data doesn't even need to be analyzed, any dolt can see it for themselves.


For any inceltears loser who needs scientific proof that normies behave most shallowly and that lookism is the law of the land.

This is straight up 100% scientific proof and fact.

 

[incellooksmaxer]

tbh this is disingenuous because its a online DATING app.

People are specifically looking for dates so physical attraction is the most important thing on it. Throughout my life I have spoken to girls on runescape etc without them even seeing photos of me, i mean, it definitely wasnt my looks that kept them talking to me because we never even saw what each other looked like.

if you want to date a girl through a dating app then you need to be good looking obviously but you can meet girls through other ways, you arent just limited to tinder and okcupid, and who knows what could happen.

Could go rock climbing and meet a girl that wouldnt even give you the time of day on tinder but fall in love with you because of personality

you guys realise tinder and okcupid isnt the only place in the world where you can meet women?

and this is from someone who was bullied and required major operation because of deformities.

---

sorry for spelling and grammer havent slept

 

[saddupbro]

tbh this is disingenuous because its a online DATING app.

Throughout my life I have spoken to girls on runescape etc without them even seeing photos of me, i mean, it definitely wasnt my looks that kept them talking to me because we never even saw what each other looked like. 

You sure they were girls? Or freeloading guys? haha

I'm not saying that Looks = Personality IRL.  


Just saying that normies are that fucking superficial.

Its scientific proof of society's lookism.

 

[incellooksmaxer]

You sure they were girls? Or freeloading guys? haha

I'm not saying that Looks = Personality IRL.  


Just saying that normies are that fucking superficial.

well, I never sent them shit. Just spoke to them, it didnt really matter because it was a video game... they could be a guy prentending to be a girl it litreally wouldnt make a difference to me just nice to have people to play with at a young age, use to love coming on and speaking to people on clan chats with runescape

and in my pirtating days used to join A LOT of IRC channels and talk about tech shit all day, there were many members who claimed to be women and no one ever posted there pic or even bothered asking because it didnt mater.

Started playing cs go a lot and every fucker would end up asking to add you on fb or some shit if you played a lot of comp matches. Never got any good at it. Also girls were whiteknighted like fuck. The worst community in history.

now i just rot all day depressed.

---

so there I said it, i have spoken to many women I never plan to date just like guys. Sure in dating it matters but not all the time.

---

also I would like to add this: you seem to think of women as emotionless creatures with no hobbies that just want to suck cock all day.

Do you seriously try and chat up everywomen even if she lives on the other side of the world

and it goes both ways. I would rather talk to someone that looks like mila kunis than a really ugly person. But sometimes, looks really dont matter to women.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

We've got data!   And a graph!      

Lookism is the law of the land.

The data doesn't even need to be analyzed, any dolt can see it for themselves.


For any inceltears loser who needs scientific proof that normies behave most shallowly and that lookism is the law of the land.

This is straight up 100% scientific proof and fact.

Common sense does not require scientific evidence for it to be proven right, denying it or coping with it is up to the person, you can look around you and experience it.
That image is for cucks over at inceltears to debate on how it doesn't reflect the general population and is therefore an inaccurate study, it unintentionally fuels their dumb narrative that we generalize everything as if it's all we're doing with our lives.

 

[saddupbro]

Common sense does not require scientific evidence for it to be proven right, denying it or coping with it is up to the person, you can look around you and experience it.
That image is for cucks over at inceltears to debate on how it doesn't reflect the general population and is therefore an inaccurate study, it unintentionally fuels their dumb narrative that we generalize everything as if it's all we're doing with our lives.

At least we've got a chart. They don't.  Their debate means jackshit. I'll wait for their counter-chart to disprove it.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

At least we've got a chart. They don't.   Their debate means jackshit. I'll wait for their counter-chart to disprove it.

There is no counter-chart to disprove it though, the notion that personality trumps physical appearance has no basis in reality and so there can be none.

 

[saddupbro]

There is no counter-chart to disprove it though, the notion that personality trumps physical appearance has no basis in reality and so there can be none.

Exactly. No chart, jackshit debate.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

Exactly. No chart, jackshit debate.

Debate as in talking between themselves on how we're wrong about generalizing things hence why they'd use that image in particular even if disproves them.

 

[saddupbro]

Debate as in talking between themselves on how we're wrong about generalizing things hence why they'd use that image in particular even if disproves them.

Yeah, I know what you mean by debate. It's just a jackshit, bullshit, rubbish debate anyway. Just to make those ICT losers feel better.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

Yeah, I know what you mean by debate. It's just a jackshit, bullshit, rubbish debate anyway. Just to make those ICT losers feel better.

Exactly, we unintentionally give meaning to some depressed assholes' lives, think about it, they've go nothing better to do than gear a portion of thei free time towards us to feel better about themselves and we do the same but to a much lesser extent.

 

[saddupbro]

Exactly, we unintentionally give meaning to some depressed assholes' lives, think about it, they've go nothing better to do than gear a portion of thei free time towards us to feel better about themselves and we do the same but to a much lesser extent.

We suffer way more than them. They take pleasure in our suffering.

If you think about it, they're actually a bunch of sadists masquerading as concerned folks.

Worst kind of human in the world.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

We suffer way more than them. They take pleasure in our suffering.

If you think about it, they're actually a bunch of sadists masquerading as concerned folks.

Worst kind of human in the world.

We get pretty sadistic too(mainly towards roasties and normies) but the difference is that we're open and honest about being sadistic, they are not, a bunch of dishonest crooks i say, masquerading as concerned folks they sure do.

 

[Bri8564]

 

[saddupbro]

C'mon, don't ignore us. We didn't say nothing wrong.

---

We get pretty sadistic too(mainly towards roasties and normies) but the difference is that we're open and honest about being sadistic, they are not, a bunch of dishonest crooks i say, masquerading as concerned folks they sure do.

Yes, that's the difference.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

C'mon, don't ignore us. We didn't say nothing wrong.

---

Yes, that's the difference.

---

lol

 

[nausea]

I'm not saying that Looks = Personality IRL. 

but you should

 

[Deleted member 306]

make me a chad ffs

 

[Framecel222]

Wow, what amazing content, I haven't seen this graph before. Truly revolutionary.

 

[saddupbro]

but you should

why? its not true. its just lookism.

 

[nausea]

why? its not true. its just lookism.

[video=youtube]http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMqDF-v6Imw[/video]

 

[saddupbro]

Wow, what amazing content, I haven't seen this graph before. Truly revolutionary.

by right it should be a circular normal distribution.