ItsovERfucks
Proud misogynist
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2023
- Posts
- 15,549
- Online time
- 2d 9h
I Say we ban this fag from being mentioned
I Say we ban this fag from being mentioned
Probably the compromise I will end up making is simply confining all speech related to this Chad to a single stickied thread on Lounge or Sewers until he completely crashes out and is no more.Speaking highly of Clavicular definitely qualifies as Chad worship and should not be allowed, in my opinion.
As for mentioning him at all...While I am personally sick and tired of hearing about this LARPer, perhaps a fair compromise be to only allow posts about him on specific days of the week?
Hahaha, I see that Greg is the same old same old.Probably the compromise I will end up making is simply confining all speech related to this Chad to a single stickied thread on Lounge or Sewers until he completely crashes out and is no more.
Highly likely for dumb fuck narcissists like this.
He's so head up his ass even his fellow normies and Chads can't get through to him.
Normie manlet Greg Douchebag attempts to talk sense into him regularly but it never lands and it never will lmao.
No you're not the only one.Hahaha, I see that Greg is the same old same old.
He is using all this social media nonsense to get on the hype train and stay relevant among the young folks.
It's basically his full time job.
Am I the only one who is annoyed by Greg's voice?
He sounds like a nagging granny.
I am in favor of a megathread.Probably the compromise I will end up making is simply confining all speech related to this Chad to a single stickied thread on Lounge or Sewers until he completely crashes out and is no more.
Highly likely for dumb fuck narcissists like this.
He's so head up his ass even his fellow normies and Chads can't get through to him.
Normie manlet Greg Douchebag attempts to talk sense into him regularly but it never lands and it never will lmao.
I want to know, too. I am out of the loop, I don't know what happenedLiterally who?
Maybe pinning it in Lounge would have been betterRoughly sixty users have voted so far.
No matter the result, it would not represent the forum, imo.
There should be a notification for every user to vote until a certain deadline.
YesWell…do you?![]()
I second this. Or limit Clavicular posts to The Sewers, that way GrAYs can't talk about them and they won't clog up ID or the Lounge.Speaking highly of Clavicular definitely qualifies as Chad worship and should not be allowed, in my opinion.
As for mentioning him at all...While I am personally sick and tired of hearing about this LARPer, perhaps a fair compromise be to only allow posts about him on specific days of the week?
I Say we ban this fag from being mentioned
>InfiltroonsThis is a retarded idea. He’s the main thing driving the attention to BP in the mainstream rn, so his name is bound to come up in vents about looksfag users and infiltroons invading the forum
Yeah, but most of them are better off on looksmax.By the very nature of his content, Clavicular will bring in a healthy chunk of new people to this forum—people who would have never considered ‘inceldom’ as a concept to begin with. When these people end up joining, they’re going to naturally want to talk about the sphere of the internet they first experienced the black-pill in.
Yes, he is a brocoli haired fagWell…do you?![]()
Agreed, and that’s where the vast majority of them will end up, I’d imagine. Still, the looksmaxx to incel pipeline is probably how almost all of us ended up here. A good chunk of the people on .org will go through the same path and eventually realize their inceldom. I don’t have any objection to those people joining as long as they are sincere.Yeah, but most of them are better off on looksmax.
Clavicular's message only applies to men starting with at least above average genetics, which is not us.
I’ve been saying infiltroon for years lol. I guess I just kinda thought of it one day.>Infiltroons
Lmfao where do you get this stuff from? I already shamelessly stole ‘femroach’ for my own use, but this one is new to me.
Yes, talk regarding that site should not be mentioned hereYes, I couldn't care less about looksfag users
Yes, I couldn't care less about looksfag users
I coined that phrase>Infiltroons
Lmfao where do you get this stuff from? I already shamelessly stole ‘femroach’ for my own use, but this one is new to me.
idk maybe if the wording on the poll was different, the result would be different tooI’ve only made two or so threads on him, and it’s just because I wanted to use the clip with him in it to talk about something else related to the black-pill.
I find it strange, however, that so many people here are in support of banning any discussion of him? Why? I would understand if it was limited to worship threads (who was the cuck doing this to begin with?), but literally ALL mention? Looksmaxxing is a part of the black-pill, and I’m not sure why some people on here seem to forget that. Clavicular is, by all accounts, a black-pill content creator—and that’s really hard to come by nowadays, let alone at the scale that Clavicular has.
Because of the limited exposure the black-pill gets in the media today, it’s honestly fairly difficult to scout out stuff to post about. There’s a reason a lot of people get tired of ID and just end up posting in the other subforums. WatER posts are important and necessary, but they can only be cycled so often before they grow stale. There’s just not enough content relating to the black-pill to consistently post about. If Clavicular solves that problem, even if only in the meantime, why ban discussion of him?
By the very nature of his content, Clavicular will bring in a healthy chunk of new people to this forum—people who would have never considered ‘inceldom’ as a concept to begin with. When these people end up joining, they’re going to naturally want to talk about the sphere of the internet they first experienced the black-pill in.
Regardless, I’ll follow whatever the majority rules without complaint—I’ll try my hardest to find good content to post about anyway. I just find it a tad ridiculous.
Who cares about a brocoli haired looksfaggerWell…do you?![]()
infiltratroon
He said “infiltroon.” That’s my creation and the search function proves thatinfiltratroon![]()
Yes, I couldn't care less about looksfag users
that's crazy, great wordHe said “infiltroon.” That’s my creation and the search function proves that
I coined scalerHe said “infiltroon.” That’s my creation and the search function proves that
I also coined "looksfagging"I coined scaler
It's this blackpiller chad who goes around the Internet and shares his crazy looksmacxing advice, he does nonsense like smoking crack in the morning to make his face leaner.what is
Clavicular talk
?
Shut the fuck up 2025 fag"let's ban talking about the biggest face of the blackpill right now, where you'll find the most content out of normies"
Thats how you kill/make a supposed incel forum worthless.
If something viral happens, like the cybertruck incident, then don't be a fag and post it. News isn't obsession with looksfags
2022 bitchShut the fuck up 2025 fag
@Clavicus Vile thoughts?Well…do you?![]()





