Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious You guys agree with LefrenchCel to ban all Clavicular talk?

You guys agree with LefrenchCel to ban all Clavicular talk?


  • Total voters
    155
  • Poll closed .
Speaking highly of Clavicular definitely qualifies as Chad worship and should not be allowed, in my opinion.


As for mentioning him at all...While I am personally sick and tired of hearing about this LARPer, perhaps a fair compromise be to only allow posts about him on specific days of the week?
 
If it gets to the point of worship and admiration, then it needs to be uprooted.
 
Speaking highly of Clavicular definitely qualifies as Chad worship and should not be allowed, in my opinion.


As for mentioning him at all...While I am personally sick and tired of hearing about this LARPer, perhaps a fair compromise be to only allow posts about him on specific days of the week?
Probably the compromise I will end up making is simply confining all speech related to this Chad to a single stickied thread on Lounge or Sewers until he completely crashes out and is no more.

Highly likely for dumb fuck narcissists like this.

He's so head up his ass even his fellow normies and Chads can't get through to him.

Normie manlet Greg Douchebag attempts to talk sense into him regularly but it never lands and it never will lmao.
 
Probably the compromise I will end up making is simply confining all speech related to this Chad to a single stickied thread on Lounge or Sewers until he completely crashes out and is no more.

Highly likely for dumb fuck narcissists like this.

He's so head up his ass even his fellow normies and Chads can't get through to him.

Normie manlet Greg Douchebag attempts to talk sense into him regularly but it never lands and it never will lmao.
Hahaha, I see that Greg is the same old same old.
He is using all this social media nonsense to get on the hype train and stay relevant among the young folks.
It's basically his full time job.

Am I the only one who is annoyed by Greg's voice?

He sounds like a nagging granny.
 
Hahaha, I see that Greg is the same old same old.
He is using all this social media nonsense to get on the hype train and stay relevant among the young folks.
It's basically his full time job.

Am I the only one who is annoyed by Greg's voice?

He sounds like a nagging granny.
No you're not the only one.

That guy is EXTREMELY annoying and has a VERY punchable face.

He actually belongs here with us but supposedly escaped through gym + status maxxing as some do.

Still far less annoying than Clav Narc though.
 
Probably the compromise I will end up making is simply confining all speech related to this Chad to a single stickied thread on Lounge or Sewers until he completely crashes out and is no more.

Highly likely for dumb fuck narcissists like this.

He's so head up his ass even his fellow normies and Chads can't get through to him.

Normie manlet Greg Douchebag attempts to talk sense into him regularly but it never lands and it never will lmao.
I am in favor of a megathread.

You are correct, though. He will be completely irrelevant in a few years. Someone with such a massive ego cannot handle the limelight. (I mean, he already got into multiple physical altercations).
 
Hate that nigga bruh he pisses me off
 
Roughly sixty users have voted so far.
No matter the result, it would not represent the forum, imo.

There should be a notification for every user to vote until a certain deadline.
Maybe pinning it in Lounge would have been better
 
I want to see the looksfag overdose
 
Updooted

Systematic automatic permanent hardban delete evERyone who mentions or even thinks
about mentioning his name, also retroactively, get that shit off this site.
 
I fucking hate Clavicular... but let us milk the lolcow, Stephen.
 
Speaking highly of Clavicular definitely qualifies as Chad worship and should not be allowed, in my opinion.


As for mentioning him at all...While I am personally sick and tired of hearing about this LARPer, perhaps a fair compromise be to only allow posts about him on specific days of the week?
I second this. Or limit Clavicular posts to The Sewers, that way GrAYs can't talk about them and they won't clog up ID or the Lounge.

And If anyone mentions Clavicular in a non-critical way, ban 'em. They're redpilled and also faggots.
 
Last edited:
Yeah ban it, Good suggestion @LeFrenchCel
 
I have no idea who or what that is
 
I only need the height to mog them into oblivion.
 
It’s whatever tbh who cares
 
I’ve only made two or so threads on him, and it’s just because I wanted to use the clip with him in it to talk about something else related to the black-pill.

I find it strange, however, that so many people here are in support of banning any discussion of him? Why? I would understand if it was limited to worship threads (who was the cuck doing this to begin with?), but literally ALL mention? Looksmaxxing is a part of the black-pill, and I’m not sure why some people on here seem to forget that. Clavicular is, by all accounts, a black-pill content creator—and that’s really hard to come by nowadays, let alone at the scale that Clavicular has.

Because of the limited exposure the black-pill gets in the media today, it’s honestly fairly difficult to scout out stuff to post about. There’s a reason a lot of people get tired of ID and just end up posting in the other subforums. WatER posts are important and necessary, but they can only be cycled so often before they grow stale. There’s just not enough content relating to the black-pill to consistently post about. If Clavicular solves that problem, even if only in the meantime, why ban discussion of him?

By the very nature of his content, Clavicular will bring in a healthy chunk of new people to this forum—people who would have never considered ‘inceldom’ as a concept to begin with. When these people end up joining, they’re going to naturally want to talk about the sphere of the internet they first experienced the black-pill in.

Regardless, I’ll follow whatever the majority rules without complaint—I’ll try my hardest to find good content to post about anyway. I just find it a tad ridiculous.
 
This is a retarded idea. He’s the main thing driving the attention to BP in the mainstream rn, so his name is bound to come up in vents about looksfag users and infiltroons invading the forum
>Infiltroons
Lmfao where do you get this stuff from? I already shamelessly stole ‘femroach’ for my own use, but this one is new to me.
 
By the very nature of his content, Clavicular will bring in a healthy chunk of new people to this forum—people who would have never considered ‘inceldom’ as a concept to begin with. When these people end up joining, they’re going to naturally want to talk about the sphere of the internet they first experienced the black-pill in.
Yeah, but most of them are better off on looksmax.

Clavicular's message only applies to men starting with at least above average genetics, which is not us.
 
Yeah, but most of them are better off on looksmax.

Clavicular's message only applies to men starting with at least above average genetics, which is not us.
Agreed, and that’s where the vast majority of them will end up, I’d imagine. Still, the looksmaxx to incel pipeline is probably how almost all of us ended up here. A good chunk of the people on .org will go through the same path and eventually realize their inceldom. I don’t have any objection to those people joining as long as they are sincere.
 
>Infiltroons
Lmfao where do you get this stuff from? I already shamelessly stole ‘femroach’ for my own use, but this one is new to me.
I’ve been saying infiltroon for years lol. I guess I just kinda thought of it one day.

“Femroach” was not my creation though. I got that from @B/W muttcel (unfortunately banished to the netherrealm for beefing with Fat Link)
 
Completely? I don't think so. Ban worship threads about him. Think totally restricting any mention of him would be too much, as he is a significant part of today's blackpill sphere. But yeah I definitely hate that pos narcissistic surgerymaxxed tallfag with a gay feminine sounding voice, which is bringing a chinktok diluted version of the blackpill to kids who will just have more reasons to mock sub-5s and compete with surgeries. Who even bases their whole persona on just mogging dudes? And normies will still worship and watch said "creators" just because they have good looks.
 
there's something off about him
 
I’ve only made two or so threads on him, and it’s just because I wanted to use the clip with him in it to talk about something else related to the black-pill.

I find it strange, however, that so many people here are in support of banning any discussion of him? Why? I would understand if it was limited to worship threads (who was the cuck doing this to begin with?), but literally ALL mention? Looksmaxxing is a part of the black-pill, and I’m not sure why some people on here seem to forget that. Clavicular is, by all accounts, a black-pill content creator—and that’s really hard to come by nowadays, let alone at the scale that Clavicular has.

Because of the limited exposure the black-pill gets in the media today, it’s honestly fairly difficult to scout out stuff to post about. There’s a reason a lot of people get tired of ID and just end up posting in the other subforums. WatER posts are important and necessary, but they can only be cycled so often before they grow stale. There’s just not enough content relating to the black-pill to consistently post about. If Clavicular solves that problem, even if only in the meantime, why ban discussion of him?

By the very nature of his content, Clavicular will bring in a healthy chunk of new people to this forum—people who would have never considered ‘inceldom’ as a concept to begin with. When these people end up joining, they’re going to naturally want to talk about the sphere of the internet they first experienced the black-pill in.

Regardless, I’ll follow whatever the majority rules without complaint—I’ll try my hardest to find good content to post about anyway. I just find it a tad ridiculous.
idk maybe if the wording on the poll was different, the result would be different too :feelshehe: @Fat Link

either way, if greys start talking about looksfags such as this, that'll just make it all the easier to identify and nuke them for being tiktok normshits :smonk:
 
I coined that phrase :feelzez:
Coined what?
IMG 1417
IMG 1418
 
everything is an extremely dead beaten phase for thunder farming looksmaxx cucks with the same shallow luxury for it
 
what is

Clavicular talk​

?
 
what is

Clavicular talk​

?
It's this blackpiller chad who goes around the Internet and shares his crazy looksmacxing advice, he does nonsense like smoking crack in the morning to make his face leaner.
 
"let's ban talking about the biggest face of the blackpill right now, where you'll find the most content out of normies":feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
Thats how you kill/make a supposed incel forum worthless.
If something viral happens, like the cybertruck incident, then don't be a fag and post it. News isn't obsession with looksfags
 
Last edited:
"let's ban talking about the biggest face of the blackpill right now, where you'll find the most content out of normies":feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
Thats how you kill/make a supposed incel forum worthless.
If something viral happens, like the cybertruck incident, then don't be a fag and post it. News isn't obsession with looksfags
Shut the fuck up 2025 fag
 
Finally this shit is getting banned tommorow
 

Similar threads

AutismKing
Replies
25
Views
735
PLS HALP ME
PLS HALP ME
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
42
Views
2K
NonNTFailure
NonNTFailure
Last2025cel
Replies
14
Views
983
RandomGuy
RandomGuy
Spooky_Heejin
Replies
23
Views
1K
lifeisfucked215
lifeisfucked215

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top