This nigger did, now look at him...
This nigger did, now look at him...
might as well dig my local graveyard atp
holy shit. i don't think he deserves to be banned. ''ascending'' with that thing is probably worse than being a virgin for life.
she looks like she makes good gumbo
It's brutal indeed.
Hoot! Bon temps 'mi!
Could not changed my poll to "she" lol.... Oh well
Even I would reject her and I have some of the lowest standards on this forum.
well, to be fair, ''he'' is a fair guess as to what that thing's real gender is, lol.
I think this would classify as beastiality if I didn’t reject her
Yeah...
I'd be rejected first, but I'd touch her saggy and gtfo
Assuming that actually is a biological female this would be a rare case where I actually feel bad for a foid, that's fucking brutal honestly.
It's completely retarded he was banned for sharing a story about a girl this ugly showing interest in him, as if that was necessarily "bragging" merely because he was so much as willing to describe what happened, and did not brag whatsoever. She's horribly ugly and overweight, she's ugly to the point it's caricatural.
I just despise how reflexive the mods here are about banning or warning users who share any stories in their lives involving women they used to associate with, even when these stories contain no bragging whatsoever. Worse yet, it's especially self-defeating and infuriating in this case, for the reasons he said: because of how ugly she was, and the fact that she blocked him the same day and hence they had no long-term contact, let alone it leading anywhere which it obviously didn't because he didn't reciprocate interest in him.
The general rule against guys bragging about past experiences as explained here makes sense, but again: reflexively construing any account of a time in the past a foid showed interest in the poster, irrespective of the details of the story, the fact it either wasn't recent or they didn't hook up (because if either were the case, it would not necessarily mean he was not an incel) or how he wrote about it, makes no sense whatsoever.
Talk about taking the "volcel if you wouldn't" joke literally and applying its conclusion in the extreme.
It's obvious they have a general issue with guys sharing stories from their lives about interactions with foids in the past where said foids showed interest in them. If they were not virgins (or perpetually celibate due to rejection despite having lost their virginity many years ago, or only having sex by seeing prostitutes) they would not be here.
Merely saying there was someone who showed interest in you in the past is not the same thing as "bragging," as if how you talk about it is irrelevant: one can describe something without bragging which is why we have a word to describe bragging. Some mods here are apparently so autistic, they think that any time a guy shares a story it is "tacit implied humble-bragging."
It makes me think: will I get warned or banned if I share a story from my life I've been meaning to here for a while? It is about a terrible whore who showed interest in me, and when I turned down her offer for a one-night-stand (I don't identify as "demisexual" but I am only interested in relationships, not hook-ups) she falsely accused me of stalking, blocked me, spread this lie to others she knew who then also blocked me. The site and wiki itself says incels are interested in long-term relationships, we are falsely accused by normies of being "shallow" and "only interested in sex" as a convenient means to dismiss us. Therefore, logically, if I only reject foids who are only interested in using me for sex then dumping me the day after, it does not mean I am not an incel. As if incels are exclusively all equally ugly. (the wiki even says: "inceldom is not actually that much related to looks.")
I'm a 29 year old virgin, very obviously not here pretending to be an incel. To what end would I spend so much time reading and writing here after almost 2 years making all of this up? The notion either 100% of the female population must reject me or otherwise I am a volcel is retarded logic in the extreme, and the kind normies use against us to justify things being this way. "Your misery is self-imposed, look at this terrible retarded whore or landwhale that would be willing to sleep with you!" Yes, if foids purvey interest in me, which has occurred in the past, I reject them because my current life circumstance makes it impossible for me to enter a long-term relationship, which is the only thing I am interested in, so I would naturally reject one-night hook-ups in any case. My life circumstance is not within my control, so neither am I a "volcel." Also I have been rejected for my looks my entire life and am a shortcel.
Last edited:
Is it a tranny?
Why the fuck was he banned. Look at that bitch, so fucking ugly. if it even is a bitch. looks like a troon.
Jesus, Fucking Hell what a mess.
Here is where the site says that a guy could be an incel even if he is not a virgin, (if he lost his virginity years ago but then fell into inceldom) and also having paid for prostitutes in the past even recently does not disqualify one from inceldom, and even says here and here that the site has voted to allow guys to talk about this.
Last edited:
Why's this nigga dragging me into it
Ive seen worse locally...
I am aware the very rule page I cited says:
But crucially, the story that the user shared in the post in question was not a romantic or sexual experience. It was just a random ugly foid that showed interest in him briefly who then proceeded to block him the same day.
Good and valid points bro... The "crabs in a bucket effect" is real.
Hard to say.
If had options, absolutely!
Because...Why's this nigga dragging me into it
Yes but he is still fakecel for having a foid intrested in him
Fat Link writes on the reply in the Rules post:
But this obviously doesn't apply to a horridly ugly foid only met online that blocks the guy who corresponded with her the same day. Also in general if incels can only get love/affection/potential voluntary unpaid sex from the ugliest/fattest foids, that doesn't mean they are not incels.
In my case, the foid not only wasn't ugly but superfically showed "love and affection" to me. (as foids often do: this is known as "love bombing" and the wiki discusses it.) She was unstable, mentally ill, had BPD, and was a nasty whore would have dumped me after a one-night stand, because this was all she was interested in. The story illustrates an important point, which is why I have been meaning to share it here for a long time. So the idea that even if any foid who is not ugly and who (apparently) shows "love and affection" to any incel, then that guy is not an incel, doesn't necessarily align to reality.
The entire point should be different incels have different circumstances, and aren't to be generalized.
Mods could take the very advice the Introduction page on the site describes here:
Last edited:
Sure,
Bullshit, this is literally normie logic: "you're not an incel, look at this 1/10 warthog who would sleep with you!" And I am not the first person here to make this point.
If any foid is interested in you, you are a fakecel, real incels are seen as crockoaches
Internet relationship stuff isn't even real. I don't think it should count for anything...
Anyone can say anything and its not enough.
Ugly foid aside he'd still get done for bragging
Ugly foids don't tell ugly men they're way out of their league or virtually beg to be their gf
But given how ugly she is perma is too much imo
I've been rejected by worse.
Even if she wasn't ugly, it's on the internet, not a real interaction so for all we know not a real person nor conceivable he could meet her IRL. You can't have sex with someone on the internet. This is involuntary celibates, not "involuntary people unable to attract someone on a medium where you can use fake pictures and even if you don't it is impossible to have sex with them anyway."
Again, I feel the need to stress that normies use the logic: "you are not incel if you wouldn't sleep with the ugliest/fattest women."
Last edited:
Doesn't mean he's a "volcel," she's still abysmally ugly and overweight on top of that.
The whole point of the "volcel if you wouldn't" thing is that was supposed to be a joke, remember?
Sam here
Exactly, I also thought the same thing.
It's funny because it's true
This is idiotic normie logic. You wouldn't have sex with a disgusting 1/10 ugly landwhale if she was throwing herself on you, and you know it. You have a completely self-defeating mindset.
Again: they use this framing to dismiss incels: "oh look, see, you aren't involuntarily celibate, look at this warthog who would sleep with you!"
Notice I am not going as far to say that a guy is an incel if a 4/10 foid who is not obese would be willing to sleep with him, but you will probably construe me as this now.
Last edited:
These kids here don't have any concept of IRL reality.
Think a swipe equals something real... Sad really
The important part is, she eventually rejected him too.
there was her looksmatch, famous truecel
Personally, I find her rejection of him to be far more brutal than his pre-rejection of her.
Throughout my life I've not even bothered to try. One can only take so much before they give up.
Yes, I'd rather be celibate for life than be with the ugliest, most disgustingly abominably unsightly foid.
The internet is the most common avenue to having sex nowadays. There's no reason to think the foid isn't real. Even if it wasn’t he'd still be bragging by implying he's desirable to foids and way out of its league.
For all each one of us knows, any other user here may not be real. In that case nothing is banworthy.
Not me. I tried to find anyone, even the most hideous of nasty beast cunts.... They are just as bad as normal looking cunts. Except worse
Good point. But still. IRL is real. Until it gets or becomes real, its not.
Yes, your point here that ugly foids will be just as arrogant/embellished/bad in their rejection of incels is correct and apt. Actually as you say they are worse. For an obvious reason: average/above-average foids are typically not as insecure as ugly foids are. For an ugly foid, "rejecting" a 5/10 guy makes her day, as it's a cope on her part due to the way foid psychology makes it so they love to feel like they are more attractive than they really are. (and attempt to foster this delusion to others in soicety: hence fakeup, and other methods.)
Actually, the point has been made here that Chads and Stacies may treat incels better: the worst attitude to incels comes from libtard men, obviously, who are typically not Chad. (though a remarkable amount of conventionally attractive men have a Liberal mindset to some extent) They are insecure and deep down know they are one misfortune/genetic mishap from being in our place, hence the need to prove they are supposedly our moral superiors. Likewise, I think in many cases Stacy wouldn't have the motive to treat incels with the disdain many average/below-average foids would.
To be honest I am really not bothered by foids hating incels the way I am men hating us, because in the case of foids them treating dejected men with disdain is to be expected. (which isn't the same as justifying it or refusing to note it's excessive; but ultimately the excessiveness is too to be expected because their entire psychology is about maximizing hypergamy) I see foids as a mindless force of nature that are just biologically compelled to act with disdain to the men they reject from the gene pool. (This is also why there is something funny and absurd about genuinely hating foids, as much as general resentment is absolutely warranted.) But white knight men by defending foids are cluelessly defending the people that hate them as much as they hate us. I maintain foids can't be bluepilled and all are inherently blackpilled, but men can be bluepilled/genuinely deluded.
Read this: it's a good comment from a now-inactive user on the site. This is how it begins though the entire thing is about four paragraphs in length.
I honestly have linked to this a good amount here, it's full of great quotes.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
