Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Would you accept communism if everything was redistributed, including the means of reproduction?

Would you accept communism if everything was redistributed, including the means of reproduction?


  • Total voters
    49
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Mentally destroyed by reality
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
51,006
Would you accept communism if everything was redistributed, including the means of reproduction?

Tell us if you are an economic communist, and if whether having true social communism will make you want to support it.
 
True communism is impossible, due to human nature, but if it could be achieved, it would be utopia for incels.
 
No because you can't redistribute everything. You can't redistribute memories or smiles. It will fail like every other time it was tried. Equality is not necessarily good either. Why should 80 IQ retards be kept alive and drawing resources away from other shit like space flight or curing cancer? There needs to be constant eugenics to prevent idiots from flourishing.
 
No because you can't redistribute everything. You can't redistribute memories or smiles. It will fail like every other time it was tried. Equality is not necessarily good either. Why should 80 IQ retards be kept alive and drawing resources away from other shit like space flight or curing cancer? There needs to be constant eugenics to prevent idiots from flourishing.
So you wouldn't want state distributed pussy, and would rather there be a higher societal push for something like natural selection?
 
Fucking degenerates.
 
There needs to be constant eugenics to prevent idiots from flourishing.

Cope, eugenics is going on, but foids/feminists/SJWs hold the power to decide who's an idiot unworthy of reproduction and who's not.
 
So you wouldn't want state distributed pussy, and would rather there be a higher societal push for something like natural selection?
Yes. Natural selection in this case being used to better humanity's ability to survive and evolve beyond this planet and branch out. We live in a cosmic shooting gallery, and if we continue to wait we might not survive the next asteroid impact. Or super volcano. Or literally anything that nature would decide to throw at us. We are currently sitting ducks.
Cope, eugenics is going on, but foids/feminists/SJWs hold the power to decide who's an idiot unworthy of reproduction and who's not.
Its eugenics for superficial shit like height. Not for actually important shit like intelligence or honesty, things civilization needs to continue.
 
Yes. Natural selection in this case being used to better humanity's ability to survive and evolve beyond this planet and branch out. We live in a cosmic shooting gallery, and if we continue to wait we might not survive the next asteroid impact. Or super volcano. Or literally anything that nature would decide to throw at us. We are currently sitting ducks.
Who tf cares, if you are never going to ever have children of your own cause you are an incel, why do you care what happens to other people's descendants in the future? That is cucked.
 
You are fine with never getting pussy and ability to breed?
I'd prefer it over destroying the whole of society just so I can get poon.

JFL at all incels claiming that having kids is a selfish thing to do while simultaneously being open to starving their country to get laid.
 
Who tf cares, if you are never going to ever have children of your own cause you are an incel, why do you care what happens to other people's descendants in the future? That is cucked.
I will have kids of my own. I'm using a surrogate. I'm not an anti-natalist like many here because what feminists ultimately want is for men like us to die off so they and their degenerate offspring can rule the earth. I'm going to do everything in my power to stop them, and one of those ways is raising a blackpilled son so that he may spread the message and get more and more males against the established order.

There will always be incels born since foids usually pass on their shit genes. So there will always be male suffering. The blackpill and tech has potential to eliminate this horror of evolution, this male disposability that we suffer under.
 
I'd prefer it over destroying the whole of society just so I can get poon.

JFL at all incels claiming that having kids is a selfish thing to do while simultaneously being open to starving their country to get laid.
Nice, the future will all be children of chad, and your genes will die out because you sacrificed yourself for having shitty genes. Cucked.
 
Nice, the future will all be children of chad, and your genes will die out because you sacrificed yourself for having shitty genes.
Good. That's called natural selection. I'm mentalcel, I have a chronic physical disease, a recessed chin, etc. Let the good genes survive to ensure the health of future generations.
 
Good. That's called natural selection. I'm mentalcel, I have a chronic physical disease, a recessed chin, etc. Let the good genes survive to ensure the health of future generations.
Go rope then, unless you are okay with helping build society for Chads and Stacies.
 
JFL at all incels claiming that having kids is a selfish thing to do while simultaneously being open to starving their country to get laid.
Attempting to fulfill a need doesn't equate to trying to justify creating need. Granted, both are selfish, we're required to be selfish to even survive.

Regardless it's a moot point, as communism doesn't work. I can only answer yes when thinking about communism in an ideal sense, not when looking at the actual reality of it's implementation.
 
Last edited:
Communism is retarded.
"To each according to their needs" is a self-defeating system
 
True communism can’t be achieved. People are too selfish and it just ends up being a brutal dictatorship. But if there was sexual communism I would be onboard. It will be good to have all the foids evenly distributed among everyone
 
Seize the means of reproduction
full
 
True communism can’t be achieved. People are too selfish and it just ends up being a brutal dictatorship. But if there was sexual communism I would be onboard. It will be good to have all the foids evenly distributed among everyone
True

Seize the means of reproduction
full
amen comrade
 
If it means there would be state instituted gfs then yes
 
nah

i wouldnt be able to afford to see gigastacy escorts
 
True communism is impossible, due to human nature, but if it could be achieved, it would be utopia for incels.
Utopias cant exist no matter the ideology,as long as there is human emotion
 
We all live under a regime where women get all their essentials need fulfilled by the state as taken from men, if we had things being redistributed in the other direction as well it would definitely be an improvement.
 
We all live under a regime where women get all their essentials need fulfilled by the state as taken from men, if we had things being redistributed in the other direction as well it would definitely be an improvement.
this tbh

nah

i wouldnt be able to afford to see gigastacy escorts
communism would mean that it's free and state mandated.
 
but there are only so many gigastacies
Well maybe you won't get gigastacies, but you will at least get some Stacies, but lots of Beckies.
 
It will fail like every other time it was tried. Equality is not necessarily good either. Why should 80 IQ retards be kept alive and drawing resources away from other shit like space flight or curing cancer? There needs to be constant eugenics to prevent idiots from flourishing.
 
I am not a capitalcuck but I wouldn't want communism either. Sharia law or bust.
 
I am not a capitalcuck but I wouldn't want communism either. Sharia law or bust.
Where does Shariah Law fall when it comes to social programs, free markets, and other such things?
 
Where does Shariah Law fall when it comes to social programs, free markets, and other such things?
According to that, it says there will be no interest rates whatsoever which is why neo-conservatives hate Islam, yearly alms for the poor that makes up 2.5% of your total income and for those that pay jizya tax, they only have to pay 1% of their overall income. So financially speaking, you're treated better as a non-Islamic person living under Islamic rules. Also, there would be no degeneracy, so every male could get a female. I don't believe in having four wives, that only is logical during times of war when there's a shortage of men, so to say that Islam encourages polygamy is wrong, like I have seen some people do here. As for the market, everything has to be done fairly. Anyone can start a business.
 
According to that, it says there will be no interest rates whatsoever which is why neo-conservatives hate Islam, yearly alms for the poor that makes up 2.5% of your total income and for those that pay jizya tax, they only have to pay 1% of their overall income. So financially speaking, you're treated better as a non-Islamic person living under Islamic rules. Also, there would be no degeneracy, so every male could get a female. I don't believe in having four wives, that only is logical during times of war when there's a shortage of men, so to say that Islam encourages polygamy is wrong, like I have seen some people do here. As for the market, everything has to be done fairly. Anyone can start a business.
Islam has a lot of based aspects but polygamy is a shit deal for the average man, and since Muhammad did it there's no way that Islamic logic would ban it.
 
Islam has a lot of based aspects but polygamy is a shit deal for the average man, and since Muhammad did it there's no way that Islamic logic would ban it.
Trust me, there is no logical reason the average man is entitled to four wives in a time where there's social security; no wars whatsoever. In this scenario, you practically steal women from other men and that is not exactly fair. Islam is fair. Only those horny bastards who want their dick wet preach about how having four wives is permissible when current circumstances don't even allow it based on logic.
 
Islam has a lot of based aspects but polygamy is a shit deal for the average man, and since Muhammad did it there's no way that Islamic logic would ban it.
Islam is pretty based, the only part that fucks it up repeatedly was Muhammad.

According to that, it says there will be no interest rates whatsoever which is why neo-conservatives hate Islam, yearly alms for the poor that makes up 2.5% of your total income and for those that pay jizya tax, they only have to pay 1% of their overall income. So financially speaking, you're treated better as a non-Islamic person living under Islamic rules. Also, there would be no degeneracy, so every male could get a female. I don't believe in having four wives, that only is logical during times of war when there's a shortage of men, so to say that Islam encourages polygamy is wrong, like I have seen some people do here. As for the market, everything has to be done fairly. Anyone can start a business.
What about sales taxes, revenue tax, property tax, tarifs, free markets, and various social programs like health care?
 
What about sales taxes, revenue tax, property tax, tarifs, free markets, and various social programs like health care?
Taxes only to ensure a safety net I am sure, I haven't done proper research on it but what I mentioned are the little things I do know.
 
Yeas, it definitly sounds a lot better than what we have now.
 
No because you can't redistribute everything. You can't redistribute memories or smiles. It will fail like every other time it was tried. Equality is not necessarily good either. Why should 80 IQ retards be kept alive and drawing resources away from other shit like space flight or curing cancer? There needs to be constant eugenics to prevent idiots from flourishing.
cogs are necessary for a machine
 
Communism is practiced with the hutterite brethren anabaptist branches scattered around northern us states and southern canada. Courtship are still individual choices tho.
 
No because communism doesn't work and in practice the party would hoard all the quality women.
 
Would you accept communism if everything was redistributed, including the means of reproduction?

Tell us if you are an economic communist, and if whether having true social communism will make you want to support it.
no i have too much money and dont want give it away. also escortceling>some garbage foid
if was youngcel i would say yes tbh
 
Would you accept communism if everything was redistributed, including the means of reproduction?

Tell us if you are an economic communist, and if whether having true social communism will make you want to support it.
First of all it wouldn't work, since the same type of whore would have to be distributed, as there will be those that end up being envious of others. Secondly, deviators will undoubteldy exist, this is a fact of life. Eliminating them would be like getting rid of Tesla because he isn't interested in fucking women and rather does his work, basically, getting rid of those that have value. Thirdly, it's expected to want more, since not everyone is easily inclined to fuck the same whore everyday, just like you don't watch the same porno everyday.

Some will bring up the coolidge effect but I question the reasons why it seems to be the case for the results to indicate why the mouse with the same partner ends up climaxing longer than with more mouses, which the answer for that would be that the mouse would like to last longer and not necessarily the same amount of time it had done previously (essentially more than before), also it doesn't fear the same mouse therefore, it feels fine than having to constantly fuck a new one everytime (unless they have the mouse fuck a new one every day). Although there's the likelihood of mouses feeling fine fucking new ones (exceptions but should be considered for questioning/understanding). Also the line for the new mouse everytime, also increases but slightly and never decreases, which does tell me that there's the likelihood of the mouse being slowly interested with fucking new ones and ends up being accustomed, than the norm, just like how curious someone maybe for something they've never knew before but were slightly cautious and now gotten used to.

Therefore, humans are in general likely to want more and try new things from what is given to them on a regular basis, than the communist viewpoint of everything needing to be regulated and monitered before administering. However, too much of doing more of the same thing or trying too many new things, can lead to the person being blinded by what they're doing and over stimulate themselves, loosing all interest.

Now, the two paragraphs might not seem to have a relation but if the issue for foids to redistributed were a thing, then expect some men going berserk for getting crap whores and etc, whilst getting mocked by those who say "be happy you got a whore even though it looks disabled", therefore what each person must understand first is self control before going about doing anything and to not let emotion or material get the best of them.

State mandated whores where they provide GFE and comfort for those who are lonely and need company, is fine and if likely that the case of genetically modified females are a thing, we can have them be solely linked to the specific man that wished to seek the services, as not only this would have a female that fulfills the empty sex life of most men but also fulfill the role of a lifelong partner.

There are some precautions to this however, as guys who choose this service have to stick with the one female, though multiple ones comes with a cost, usually a high price to sustain the service and to prevent greed driven men who obviously seek a harem, however, this is considered through a limit being placed with one person allowed a maximum of 3 females (Death of anyone doesn't cause a refund policy or some warrant, if you kill them; your loss)
 
No because you can't redistribute everything. You can't redistribute memories or smiles. It will fail like every other time it was tried. Equality is not necessarily good either. Why should 80 IQ retards be kept alive and drawing resources away from other shit like space flight or curing cancer? There needs to be constant eugenics to prevent idiots from flourishing.
Tbhngl. Communism is retarded in its assumptions that everyone is equal when we are very obviously not. There’s a such thing as inferiors, superiors, different phenotypes, different genetics and bone structures, etc.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top