Theory Women's education has intensified competition

[Puzzle]

The crisis in the dating market has multiple causes, but I would like to address the demographic factor, specifically how education plays a role.

There is an imbalance in the sex ratio and an increase in the number of men and women who no longer live in the same areas. In many countries, particularly in the West, women are more likely to live in urban areas because more of them pursue careers in health, education, media, social work, and other people-oriented fields and have higher rates of university enrollment and graduation especially because the education system favors feminine behaviors because they tend to be more attentive and malleable.

In contrast, men, especially those without higher education, are more likely to stay to rural or suburban areas , work in manual or commercial occupations (like construction, agriculture, manufacturing), which don't necessarily require moving to the city. Men also have lower economic mobility, making moving to the city less feasible.

Thus, many cities end up with a surplus of educated women, while rural areas have a surplus of men !!!

There is an educational gap that plays a central role in partner choice: hypergamy shows that women often prefer partners with higher levels of education and economic status. As more and more women surpass men in terms of educational attainment, this reduces the pool of what they consider acceptable partners, particularly for highly educated women. All of this leads to increased competition in the dating market and loneliness among men living in rural areas, some of whom feel left behind or disconnected from this world. Dating apps, which in theory eliminate geographical separation, only amplify sorting based on social status.


And it's getting worse and worse, buddy boys, the projections aren't good :

 

[starystulejarz]

We won't last till 2050 at this rate, even without their planned plandemic that will wipe most of us.

Democracy with Capitalism always leads to Feminism, Immigration, Depopulation and Corporationism as they need more workers and more voters for their commie parties that give free money to foids and immigrants.

While native men are falling behind by the design, they want us dead, unhappy, broke with no savings or home and without family and kids.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

strong first post

 

[AdolfRizzler]

basically, it means in the future will be over for more and more men!

 

[Sonicfancel]

While foids are married to the state no men will truly be enough. Marriage which was a win-win historically now it only benefit foids.

 

[starystulejarz]

While foids are married to the state no men will truly be enough.

Big Brother is their main husband.

And yet they want to marry another dude to steal all his resources and give it back to the Big Brother in taxes.

 

[frmentalcel]

the only education toilets should have is how to shut their mouths when theyre getting raped brutally

 

[soft]

Strong first post.

I think the solution is to give men incentives to educate themselves, rebuild the educational system around men's way of learning. But the powers that be (cuckservatives on one side, feminists on the other) are very short sighted and they think men will just figure everything out by themselves. They want to keep pandering to women instead. And if the system were to facilitate men's development, women would once again be left in the dust. It would burst the artificially inflated bubble that women are "strong and independent" - they are only 'strong' when given handicaps, and only 'independent' when daddy government is there to take the blow for their every mistake.

 

[Puzzle]

Strong first post.

I think the solution is to give men incentives to educate themselves, rebuild the educational system around men's way of learning. But the powers that be (cuckservatives on one side, feminists on the other) are very short sighted and they think men will just figure everything out by themselves. They want to keep pandering to women instead. And if the system were to facilitate men's development, women would once again be left in the dust. It would burst the artificially inflated bubble that women are "strong and independent" - they are only 'strong' when given handicaps, and only 'independent' when daddy government is there to take the blow for their every mistake.

 

[SmhChan]

In many countries, particularly in the West, women are more likely to live in urban areas because more of them pursue careers in health, education, media, social work, and other people-oriented fields and have higher rates of university enrollment and graduation especially because the education system favors feminine behaviors because they tend to be more attentive and malleable.

In contrast, men, especially those without higher education, are more likely to stay to rural or suburban areas , work in manual or commercial occupations (like construction, agriculture, manufacturing), which don't necessarily require moving to the city. Men also have lower economic mobility, making moving to the city less feasible.

I think foids dominating the administrative jobs started with the start of WWII. After that they started taking over Education, Legal service, Media (and Publishing Industry). In the corporate space, it started with the HR, and now it's fully foid infested. There's also Banking and Finance which are now also foid dominated So, I don't think foids are "more likely" to pursue careers in some of these fields. It's that men are only hired for jobs that are manual in the 21st century. For example, like you mentioned, Construction and Manufacturing (Factory Jobs), which are also large part of the Urban Economy. Yet, men don't want to move to the Urban areas.

I think it somewhat has to do with the difference in quality of social life Urban area promises. I mean there are a lot of zoomer foids scraping by in the cities, yet don't want to move out. On the other hand, you have ITcels making big money in some big tech company, yet can't wait to save enough and get out.

 

[Sex-Starved Beast]

The education system is designed to favor women. How fucked is it? Having good jobs be gatekept by a pain-in-the ass years-long activity that women have no problem going through, but that some men by nature will barely stand; and it gets worse if they are low IQ like me, because then not only it's annoying and pointless, but also difficult as fuck. Education should be about learning, but I feel that it's only meant to constantly test your IQ and other qualities that you already had beforehand, and not to actually make you improve anywhere. And even there it fails, as there are loads of natural talents and people that would be able to add a lot to the world, but just can't show it in school. So not only it is not meant to teach, but to test, but it's also very specific and arbitrary in what it wants: it wants a certain kind of high-IQ foids.
It's meant for foids. Unless you do medicine or engineering, which then makes sense as you need a good formation there, or you do one of those colleges with more emphasis on stages and hand-on experience than on grades, completing university doesn't add any skill or knowledge to your life, but only gives you the degree, which is the real end goal of it (other than all the sex and partying that we are excluded from anyway), and that's just stupid for so-called "education". It made sense maybe fifty years ago, but now it's just a foid institution meant to weed out ND men.

Now, I'm not an idiot or an ignorant. I'm not at all against the education itself, I'm against the current state of the system that is supposed to educate. There is something seriously wrong with it.

 

[SmhChan]

The education system is designed to favor women. How fucked is it? Having good jobs be gatekept by a pain-in-the ass years-long activity that women have no problem going through, but that some men by nature will barely stand; and it gets worse if they are low IQ like me, because then not only it's annoying and pointless, but also difficult as fuck. Education should be about learning, but I feel that it's only meant to constantly test your IQ and other qualities that you already had beforehand, and not to actually make you improve anywhere. And even there it fails, as there are loads of natural talents and people that would be able to add a lot to the world, but just can't show it in school. So not only it is not meant to teach, but to test, but it's also very specific and arbitrary in what it wants: it wants a certain kind of high-IQ foids.
It's meant for foids. Unless you do medicine or engineering, which then makes sense as you need a good formation there, or you do one of those colleges with more emphasis on stages and hand-on experience than on grades, completing university doesn't add any skill or knowledge to your life, but only gives you the degree, which is the real end goal of it (other than all the sex and partying that we are excluded from anyway), and that's just stupid for so-called "education". It made sense maybe fifty years ago, but now it's just a foid institution meant to weed out ND men.

Now, I'm not an idiot or an ignorant. I'm not at all against the education itself, I'm against the current state of the system that is supposed to educate. There is something seriously wrong with it.

Modern education system is all about short-term memorization and foids are better than men at that. It's lowest form of learning. That's why which seems like a pain-in-the-ass to you comes to foids naturally.