Water post, but this is mainly pointing at IT lurkers. was thinking about it, height and weight are viewed as the same when it simply aren't. The most obvious difference is that you need to break your legs to change, while the other all you need is reta or discipline.but also the market for short men vs the market for fat women are far different there are more men who want fat women and desire fat women. Where are women that go for short men?compared to fat women. The data supports this."...body image was found to be the better measure of excessive weight in looking at this relationship as the perception of weight was statistically significant in determining relationship success, whereas BMI was not."(source:https://scholars.unh.edu/perspectives/vol14/iss1/1/) so this means objectively BMI itself isn't an indicator of relationship status however, height is proven to hinder dating success:
incel wiki
So the conclusion is that fat women are being chosen; however, they themselves choose not to date. But for short men, they aren't being chosen by women, so it doesn't even line up with mating success with the opposite gender I dont even under the comparison
incel wiki
So the conclusion is that fat women are being chosen; however, they themselves choose not to date. But for short men, they aren't being chosen by women, so it doesn't even line up with mating success with the opposite gender I dont even under the comparison
Last edited:
