Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion "women are preventing future generations from being ugly! So noble!"

deleted fren

deleted fren

Everything burns
-
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
43,116
Online time
1h 50m
I'm sick of hearing "WOMEN ARE ENSURING FUTURE GENERATIONS AREN'T UGLY! SO NOBLE!" because such a ridiculous statement completely ignores the FACT that UGLY WOMEN are the ones who have been reproducing. NOT UGLY MEN! It's ugly women who are more likely to be married than average women.


And ugly women will always reproduce unless they're spaded.
 
Luckily i havent heard this before
 
that sentence implies women can’t be ugly
 
Eugenics is okay when attractive people are advocating for it against "ugly" people
 
Ugly women create ugly men, not visceversa
 
Women are the furthest thing from noble
 
I'm sick of hearing "WOMEN ARE ENSURING FUTURE GENERATIONS AREN'T UGLY! SO NOBLE!" because such a ridiculous statement completely ignores the FACT that UGLY WOMEN are the ones who have been reproducing. NOT UGLY MEN! It's ugly women who are more likely to be married than average women.


And ugly women will always reproduce unless they're spaded.
a single stroll outside tells you everything you need to know

ALL of the women pushing baby strollers are ugly and old, every single one of them

you basically have a merciless filter that is removing all women that can sell their pussy online from the gene pool

generation Z might have been taller and better looking on average, but what is coming next is a fucking disaster of epic proportions
 
Eugenics is okay when attractive people are advocating for it against "ugly" people
Whatever women say is seen as OKAY as long as it only applies to men.

Ugly women create ugly men, not visceversa
Yes.

Women are the furthest thing from noble
What do you mean? Masturbating to fantasies of serial killers isn't noble?
Abortions aren't noble?
a single stroll outside tells you everything you need to know

ALL of the women pushing baby strollers are ugly and old, every single one of them

you basically have a merciless filter that is removing all women that can sell their pussy online from the gene pool

generation Z might have been taller and better looking on average, but what is coming next is a fucking disaster of epic proportions
True. Especially with how old women are. Autism is going to see an insane spike.
 
People who say this should be greeted with the Sinaloa Treatment
 
Ugly short men die off and ugly short women pass on the bad genetics that’s how it’s always worked fuck foids
 
Some how they believe that women don’t pass down genes at all and the children are 100% from the dad. Also a woman can never be average and of course not below average
 
The thing is that it doesn't really matter, every generation will have outcasts. What will be considered handsome today, might be considered average or ugly the next generation.

Ugly men that are outcast will always exist.

Oh and btw there are also genetic deformities/abnormalities or terrible accidents that cause maiming sometimes. Ensuring that there will always be outcast ugly people..
 
Back then they'd kill excess female babies if there were times of scarcity since females were less adept at working the fields and providing manual labor so they'd just end up being extra mouths to feed. At least men could make decent worker drones, foids were good for nothing in lean times except for producing more mouths to feed which wasn't desired.

Not to mention mortality rates during childbirths in the preindustrial era were astoundingly high too. If you actually took natural selection and eugenics to its natural conclusion because you think ugly undesirable men are supposed to die in war or whatever other pseudoscientific reason, then it's perfectly fine for foids to die by the scores during childbirth. It's just natural selection after all, if they couldn't survive the birthing process that's because they were unfit to live and it's not my problem as a man. Works for me JFL :feelsthink:

In addition it tends to be the most physically fit and able men that get drafted first (aka non incels and the men that foids want to date the most), so if anything it benefits inkwells more than it does chad chasing whores. Heck, they'd draft females before they'd draft asthmatic incels with autism. These braindead retards cannot stop to think for a moment before saying the most ridiculous claims. Feminists are so goddamn mentally disabled they play into the hands of the ebil inkwells they hate.
 
Last edited:
Back then they'd kill excess female babies if there were times of scarcity since females were less adept at working the fields and providing manual labor so they'd just end up being extra mouths to feed. At least men could make decent worker drones, foids were good for nothing in lean times except for producing more mouths to feed which wasn't desired.

Not to mention mortality rates during childbirths in the preindustrial era were astoundingly high too. If you actually took natural selection and eugenics to its natural conclusion because you think ugly undesirable men are supposed to die in war or whatever other pseudoscientific reason, then it's perfectly fine for foids to die by the scores during childbirth. It's just natural selection after all, if they couldn't survive the birthing process that's because they were unfit to live and it's not my problem as a man. Works for me JFL :feelsthink:

In addition it tends to be the most physically fit and able men that get drafted first (aka non incels and the men that foids want to date the most), so if anything it benefits inkwells more than it does chad chasing whores. Heck, they'd draft females before they'd draft asthmatic incels with autism. These braindead retards cannot stop to think for a moment before saying the most ridiculous claims. Feminists are so goddamn mentally disabled they play into the hands of the ebil inkwells they hate.
:bigbrain:
You should make this its own post. Very high IQ and enjoyable read. Agreed completely.
 
It should be the other way around
 
The next generation of people will be worse on every imaginable level, not just looks wise.

Women have made it known that they have awful mate selection skills.
 
It's always utterly laughable when they spew arguments along these lines, particularly detached drivel such as the idea women are selecting for optimal genes — which is demonstrably false, and is quite ironically the exact opposite: they select for the worst possible, most anti-social, and detrimental traits. If it wasn't for enforced monogamy in previous ages, humanity would remain with huts and primitive houses as its primary residence; the genetic variance would be considerably lower, and our cognitive capacity would still be antediluvian.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top