L
With enough politic power, would it be nice to rule the world as It was before (women don't vote) or outlaw sex? Another ideas are accepted.
Discussion With enough politic power, would it be nice to rule the world as It was before (women don't vote) or outlaw sex? Another ideas are accepted.
L
Biggest gigacope ever, ugly males were treated like shit even back then
would do my signature basically
leave a vote and reply on my scientific poll brothers
[POLL WITH VISUAL EXAMPLES] On a scale of 1 to 5, to what extent would you be willing to fuck zombie girls?
With 1 being the most human-like and 5 being the most zombie-like, what would be your personal limit? Keep in mind that this isn't about what you would prefer, but rather how far you would be willing to go assuming none of the other options are available. disclaimer before the mods fuck my ass...
incels.is
cope, subhuman will always be a subhuman. there's nothing you can ever do to change it.
based
M
Yes, but at least you could realistically expect to get married and have authority over your wife. Also no divorce and especially no frivorce.
Traditionalism is still gynocentric, but it's undoubtedly better for ugly males (and for everyone in the long run) than clown-world feminist harem societies.
L
How is traditionalism gynocentric?
M
Women have more value than men in any society. Men go die en masse in wars, men go work at terrible jobs en masse as well and die prematurely, etc, while women mostly stay home doing house work. Not to mention "women and children first", this wasn't invented by feminists in 1960, it was invented in tradicional old societies. And they have the audacity of calling all of this oppression, JFL.
This is why religion was important and forced monogamy so Chad only gets 1 wife and incels get 1 wife. If a woman committed adultery, she would be stoned to death publicly. Redpill crap doesn't work and the blackpill is when you realize that women have to literally be beaten and killed in order to have a stable society. "Holding frame" ain't gonna fix women's corrupt nature.
L
I guess they consider it opression due to the fact that they are mostly considered as the weak sex (and biologically, they are most of the times). Men go and die because we are meant to be strong, isn't it? And if a man does not accomplish that strenght we know what happens. I think the world does not work well for everybody. I wouldn't say it was gynocentric, I think we live in a world where being a man or a woman have strong rules and expectations.
Last edited:
M
And now they pretend to be strong and just as capable as man, being massively, artificially helped by simp laws (like maternity leave, female quotas, among hundreds of other pro-women laws), but anytime something goes minimally wrong and they have to actually reap the consequences of their retarded foid choices, they instantly change the discourse back to "I was a victim", "I was manipulated", "men made me do it", etc. Like they were incapable small toddlers.
Women are pathetic, seriously. If they weren't so attractive to us and didn't have holes everybody would be able to see it clearly.
L
So how would be a good solution to it?
How you outlaw? All dicks cut off?
L
I don't know, but if you could, would you outlaw it? I've heard from other people that sex is not neccesary for reproduction.
Last edited:
Does that include me? No point in ruling if you can't get it too.
But if I gotta be without sex as an incel, yeah I'd press a button to kill sex for EVERYONE if I'm suffering.
I wouldn't even do all that, I'd allow women to keep all the options they have now, but create/alter laws that render those privileges useless
1. Outlaw "no fault" divorce - There must be a specific fault and it must be reasonable (proof is required, not hearsay)
2. All marriage contracts come with an unalterable prenuptial agreement, if your husband who you divorce wants to give you money, he has to first divorce you and then give it to you afterwards, other than that you get nothing
3. Decriminalize (not legalize but decriminalize) prostitution, and allow for a "brothel owners license". The rise in the large amount of sex workers will result in lower prices for sex all around, and a lot of men can now have their needs met even if they can't get a date. It will also lower the collective value placed on women's bodies since it is more easily accessible by the common man
Women only get all this special treatment because sex is a resource that they hoard and monopolize to their advantage, take away the scarcity and down goes the value, its all about supply and demand.
4. Write up a law so that for every dollar that goes into organizations like planned parenthood, or free birth control programmes, a dollar also has to go into funding research for realistic sex robots, and another dollar goes towards researching artificial wombs
I think its very fitting, this way women's rampant promiscuity and hypergamy will fuel the invention and improvement of technologies that will "free" men from being dependent on a woman's body. The more they ride the cock carousel, they closer they get to an era where men won't even care about women anymore
This is all that I can think of at the top of my head, but I would do a lot more
Basically I'd allow women to keep all the amazing perks they have, the right to vote, own property, all the feminism BS, etc, but I'd create laws that render these perks useless, because men would now be able to operate outside of "the game" that society forces men to play by limiting their options
I truly believe that most men are only simps, because they've been raised in an era where paying for sex is difficult and illegal, and you are shamed for it. But once prostitution is normalized for a few decades as a "common male practice" and sex is cheap and easily available to all men of all looks tiers, simping will become fucking non-existent, I am not exaggerating, men will simply just stop caring
Men are simps today because women hoard sex and leverage it to blackmail the male collective into "playing their tune", if we structured society in a manner that strips away that power, overtime we would revert to a patriarchy, in fact, into something better than that, a patriarchy that could not be overthrown, because it isn't instituted by force, its instituted by allowing men the freedom to say no to limited options
We don't need laws that FORCE WOMEN TO DO X to create an enjoyable society for men, we need laws that DON'T FORCE MEN TO NOT DO X
We don't need to take away women's options, we need to give men more options, that's how you we can defeat feminism, trying to force women won't work, society will resist it, but changing laws so that women can no longer take advantage of men, society could not put up much of a resistance against that
Last edited:
L
A pretty interesting sight, pal. However, may I ask you why do you call their "rights" as "perks"?
Last edited:
Because they are "perks", rights are something that are fought and earned through blood and death, women were just granted these privileges because they begged and men felt sorry for them, they didn't "earn" anything, its not like women gathered together and fought men for their rights lol
It is even inscribed in American law that every man can be conscripted into war and that is the price paid to have rights in America (you can look it up if you don't already know this). If a man is a citizen of America, he is legally obligated to be conscripted into war, if he refuses he is imprisoned (women on the other hand are free to fuck Chads like crazy while men go to war and die)
Women get all of the rights men have without the forced conscription with threat of jail time and without ever having to physically fight and die for those rights
Even slaves went to war and died for their rights, emancipation was earned through blood and death, but women as a collective never did shit to have "rights", and it is in that sense that they don't really have "rights", they have perks and privileges, its just special treatment men give women because they like them and pity them (men have a soft spot for women)
Ironically even when women go willingly into the army they get put into safer roles that are far outside of combat or their combat positions are usually of minimal risk
There's also a lot of unfair politics at play, I've seen talks by men who are in the army and know how this shit works, and basically since women are away from combat more than the men, they have more time to study for their "sergeant exam" (I think that's what they call it, can't remember), so there are a lot of women being promoted faster than the men who are fighting and risking their lives
Its really fucked up when you think about it
So this bitch who only joined so she could prove "I'm a strong woman" to herself, barely passed the physical exam (which was artificially lowered for women), barely saw any combat or saw none at all in a safe role, and now she outranks you because you were out there fighting and surviving and didn't have time to study
Lastly, getting 50% of a man's wealth because you fucked him for a few years should never be seen as a "right", that's ridiculous, if society was reversed and women were the usual "breadwinners", such a "right" would never be allowed to exist
On another note I found your question kind of "suspect", because it seems like the kind of question a woman would ask, I didn't even think twice about the question you just asked (I did not think twice about me referring to what women have as "options", "perks", "privileges", etc, it felt like something negligible to me, something I didn't even notice, it was a non issue) but for some reason that just jumped out at you (that just reads like a woman who took offense and felt like she had to ask a question about it)
I am very paranoid, so maybe I'm reading too much into this, but that question just made you look like a female larp who made this thread so she could get some cliche bait responses, or some kind of female reporter, and my response which was different from the rest peaked your interest (but also because it offended you and you want to understand my rationale)
I'm probably just reading too much into this, carry on
Last edited:
L
Sorry to dissapoint you, but I'm actually a man. I was just curious about it, I'm new at these forums tho. I barely know about incel ideology so I usually have tons of questions. So I was making these general questions to get more into this.
Oh, there are a lot of larps on this forum these days, be careful who you PM personal details too
M
Putting women back in their proper place in society.
1 Timothy 5:
14 I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.1 Corinthians 11:
8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
1 Timothy 2:
9 Likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire1 Timothy 2:
11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
It's not "ideology". The blackpill is the facts presented to you without any bias. It's cutting through the lies that society tells you and getting down to the truth.
L
was about to say
L
Thanks for the explanation. I didn't know what blackpill meant, I'll get more into this.
We've all been conditioned by society to believe certain things and to say certain things in order to be accepted and integrated into it. The blackpill will require you to put those things aside and think objectively with just facts.
L
check out the wiki
OP is a cuck.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
