Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

will landwhales have adherence to IIFYM?

janoycresva

janoycresva

hey
-
Joined
Jun 20, 2018
Posts
3,071
Do you think it's possible to help a landwhale lose very significant weight? I'm under the impression that land whales are completely clueless about dieting because of their general laziness to do research. Say as incels, we were to start approaching these fat landwhales and guiding them through the dieting process, would they have the will power to stick to it or are they too far gone? Is it the lack of dieting knowledge that is preventing these land whales from becoming fit or is it their complete lack of will power? Because I'm genuinely confused as to why anyone would want to remain fat with how easy it is to lose weight through flexible dieting.
 
the problem is if you want to approach a landwhale, it's because she usually has passable non-syndrome features, and those already act like stacies so you're fucked anyway.

there's also the issue of you building an experience together with her which she can easily take away for herself, like the experience of her becoming fit with your help. you want to build experiences that cannot be taken away, isolating you.
 
1. pretty much everybody knows or can quickly learn how to lose weight. The reason they don't is that it takes too much effort for too little benefit.

2 When long-time landwhales lose weight, their skin will hang and they'll look haggard. Surgery can only partly fix it.

3. Even if you did help them lose weight, you won't be the one benefitting from it.
 
1. pretty much everybody knows or can quickly learn how to lose weight. The reason they don't is that it takes too much effort for too little benefit.

2 When long-time landwhales lose weight, their skin will hang and they'll look haggard. Surgery can only partly fix it.

3. Even if you did help them lose weight, you won't be the one benefitting from it.
it's over
 
Not to IIFYM nope. IIFYM only works if you're naturally skele and not interested in eating and who can stop eating once they taste something tasty. If someone who got fat/obese does IIFYM they'll try to fit in some junk into their macros, and the moment the try to fit in a bowl of ice-cream or a chocolate bar into their macros, they'll just go ham and eat the entire container, or eat another 10 bars.

IIFYM still requires you to be restrictive because you're restricted to your macros. A fatty would be more likely to stick to just counting calories and not worrying about macros. Macros don't even fucking matter unless you're trying maximize your body-composition on a bodybuilding stage. You can just count protein & total calories and still get 99.8% of the same results you'd get counting all 3 macros if you're lifting, and if you're not lifting, counting just calories is perfectly fine.

But..............Chad does none of this and mogs you.


FYI: Chads don't ever do any of this, their genetics and natural eating habits have them muscular and lean.
 
Not to IIFYM nope. IIFYM only works if you're naturally skele and not interested in eating and who can stop eating once they taste something tasty. If someone who got fat/obese does IIFYM they'll try to fit in some junk into their macros, and the moment the try to fit in a bowl of ice-cream or a chocolate bar into their macros, they'll just go ham and eat the entire container, or eat another 10 bars.

IIFYM still requires you to be restrictive because you're restricted to your macros. A fatty would be more likely to stick to just counting calories and not worrying about macros. Macros don't even fucking matter unless you're trying maximize your body-composition on a bodybuilding stage. You can just count protein & total calories and still get 99.8% of the same results you'd get counting all 3 macros if you're lifting, and if you're not lifting, counting just calories is perfectly fine.

But..............Chad does none of this and mogs you.


FYI: Chads don't ever do any of this, their genetics and natural eating habits have them muscular and lean.
This.Only one person can help the landwhales....

121049
 
The enjoy being fat insulin resistant pigs.
 
Not to IIFYM nope. IIFYM only works if you're naturally skele and not interested in eating and who can stop eating once they taste something tasty. If someone who got fat/obese does IIFYM they'll try to fit in some junk into their macros, and the moment the try to fit in a bowl of ice-cream or a chocolate bar into their macros, they'll just go ham and eat the entire container, or eat another 10 bars.

IIFYM still requires you to be restrictive because you're restricted to your macros. A fatty would be more likely to stick to just counting calories and not worrying about macros. Macros don't even fucking matter unless you're trying maximize your body-composition on a bodybuilding stage. You can just count protein & total calories and still get 99.8% of the same results you'd get counting all 3 macros if you're lifting, and if you're not lifting, counting just calories is perfectly fine.

But..............Chad does none of this and mogs you.


FYI: Chads don't ever do any of this, their genetics and natural eating habits have them muscular and lean.

I'd say that the landwhales maintenance will be so high that she can eat a lot of junk at first, we're talking about 250-400lbs women, they can probably eat a whole tub of ice cream at the beginning of their cut. The idea is that we'd do all of the macro calculations, track her sleep, and keep track of her weight and slowly get her used to eating less and less food over time. Now, I believe there may also be some slightly chunky women who just don't understand the concept of calories in v.s. calories out (there's a lot of dieting BS out there) so maybe just educating them a bit can help them lose weight. That's basically where the whole idea lies, maybe these fat foids think that to lose weight they have to eat salads and lean protein all day, thus they can never do it. I'm asking that if they were pointed in the right direction, could they do it?

I agree with everything else. The landwhale would only need to track calories. With lifting though and especially with athletes, prioritizing carbs is usually better.
 
I'd say that the landwhales maintenance will be so high that she can eat a lot of junk at first, we're talking about 250-400lbs women, they can probably eat a whole tub of ice cream at the beginning of their cut. The idea is that we'd do all of the macro calculations, track her sleep, and keep track of her weight and slowly get her used to eating less and less food over time. Now, I believe there may also be some slightly chunky women who just don't understand the concept of calories in v.s. calories out (there's a lot of dieting BS out there) so maybe just educating them a bit can help them lose weight. That's basically where the whole idea lies, maybe these fat foids think that to lose weight they have to eat salads and lean protein all day, thus they can never do it. I'm asking that if they were pointed in the right direction, could they do it?

I agree with everything else. The landwhale would only need to track calories. With lifting though and especially with athletes, prioritizing carbs is usually better.

If someone gets to 250-400lbs they dont have the willpower to IIFYM and lose fat.

I dunno what this fascination is with IIFYM, it gained popularity within the bodybuilding world from ex-skeletons who didn't want to eat clean because they couldn't "eat clean" and get enough calories in to gain weight, so IIFYM was the way to fit in a ton of junk calories after protein goals were met, as for a skeleton getting in enough calories eating "bro foods" is very hard for them.

Again, IIFYM just wont work for a fatty. A fatty has 1 taste of junk calories and they go HAM and eat thousands of calories. Fatties are unironically better off just doing bro-foods and eating clean and avoiding junk all-together, as junk food triggers them to binge, where as bro foods wont.
 
Let’s say you somehow attract a landwhale (They have a lot of options, normies will fuck them still) good luck getting them to lose weight. They could probably be healthy in a year if they really wanted to lose weight and diet.

The problem is, once they lose weight, they are going to drop you like a hot potato for a Chadlite or normie. Landwhales are the most entitled and mentally ill women I have ever met.
 
Let’s say you somehow attract a landwhale (They have a lot of options, normies will fuck them still) good luck getting them to lose weight. They could probably be healthy in a year if they really wanted to lose weight and diet.

The problem is, once they lose weight, they are going to drop you like a hot potato for a Chadlite or normie. Landwhales are the most entitled and mentally ill women I have ever met.
soon so many women in the west will be obese that the "strategy" of going for a less desirable fat woman will not even work anymore
 
soon so many women in the west will be obese that the "strategy" of going for a less desirable fat woman will not even work anymore
It already doesn’t work, only normies can get LTR fat women. Just ask @FACEandLMS about getting cucked by a fat chick.
 
Yeah, help a woman...endure the shame whilst she loses weight...have someone else benefit from it... No thanks.
 
If someone gets to 250-400lbs they dont have the willpower to IIFYM and lose fat.

I dunno what this fascination is with IIFYM, it gained popularity within the bodybuilding world from ex-skeletons who didn't want to eat clean because they couldn't "eat clean" and get enough calories in to gain weight, so IIFYM was the way to fit in a ton of junk calories after protein goals were met, as for a skeleton getting in enough calories eating "bro foods" is very hard for them.

Again, IIFYM just wont work for a fatty. A fatty has 1 taste of junk calories and they go HAM and eat thousands of calories. Fatties are unironically better off just doing bro-foods and eating clean and avoiding junk all-together, as junk food triggers them to binge, where as bro foods wont.
This makes sense, I guess it’s over
soon so many women in the west will be obese that the "strategy" of going for a less desirable fat woman will not even work anymore
This sucks, I see more and more fat foids everyday tbh
Let’s say you somehow attract a landwhale (They have a lot of options, normies will fuck them still) good luck getting them to lose weight. They could probably be healthy in a year if they really wanted to lose weight and diet.

The problem is, once they lose weight, they are going to drop you like a hot potato for a Chadlite or normie. Landwhales are the most entitled and mentally ill women I have ever met.
Yeah to get that fat in the first place, you probably do have to have some mental issues tbh ngl
 
Many have tried this theory. Get a fat land whale and help her get slim.

Problem is once they lose weight they start getting attention from all sort of guys, even chads.

Soon they resent you because hotter guys are hitting on her daily and you are the reason she can’t be with them. Later you’ll get dumped
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
6
Views
309
bcroger
B
fukurou
Replies
5
Views
321
Enigmaz
Enigmaz
WeirdPanda
Replies
42
Views
612
mylifebelike5'7
M
Abi
Replies
19
Views
403
Horatio Alger
Horatio Alger

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top