Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Why Nazis and other stormfrontcels are bluepillers

K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Wizard
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
4,421
Ok, let us start with the basic question: Why do we think inceldom is unfair?

If we were tribal Neolithic hunter gatherers we would find it normal to be incels. In those times, each tribe was run by the local Chad who fucked the local Stacies. As a result, there was a deficit of available women and therefore there were several incels in each tribe. They were generally called "rubbish men" or something like that according to anthropologists who studied the last remaining such tribes in Papua New Guinea at the beginning of the XXth century. Incels all right.

However, closer to us, there were societies where there were no incels. In a New England Puritain village in the 17th century, there were no Chads. Stacies were burned at the stake as witches if they acted up and chads were banished if they started "acting proud". Every man who could say his name and work with his own two hands would get a wife.

This is the baseline against which our present situation is (legitimately) considered unfair.

I am not a Chiristian (never believed in God) but I have to admit that it is Christianity that has done the most against the tyranny of Chads and Stacies and therefore helped incels the most. The Christian model is the most based model, whether we like it or not.

SJW/Woke crap started tearing apart the Christian model at the "Renaissance" and then the "Enlightenment". Then it turned into Communism. Communists were early feminists. There were women in soviet road construction crews and factories and in the Red army during WWII.

Nazism began in the early 1920s as a reaction against communism. The problem is that if you take the opposite of a bluepill, without understanding that the only based model available is Christianity, you just get another bluepill, not the blackpill. The most glaring sign of this is that Nazis worshiped chads and sort of implicitly promised that any member of the chosen race would be treated like Chad under the Nazi version of Utopia. Look at the Jaws in the images below:
1938 vintage nazi german racist propaganda press article stereotype images portraying the pure
805629404 orig
Eb43cc10bb7c9995ece565948c51c28e

If you worship Chad, you worship Stacy (two sides of same coin) That is why Christians were against all forms of "idolatry"

Nazis did not understand that the real an only based model was Christianity, which they rejected. What they merely did was invent a new bluepill.

Worse still, with their stupidity and failures, the Nazis empowered the feminists. Third way feminism is an inverted image of Nazi Chad worship. Girl power is a mirror image of SS power.

Thank you dumbass Nazis for making stuff worse and thank you dumbass bluepill stromfrontcels for continuing to do the same today.

TL;DR: Nazis just inverted the Woke/SJW bluepill into another bluepill by worshiping Chad
 
Last edited:
@BummerDrummer
 
Nazis are normie and low tier normie Chad worshippers, no doubt about that, but no one has done more harm to Chad and stacies in the 30s and 40s than Nazis, tho their intentions might be different, ofc only for WASPs or Nordic Chads and Stacies
 
JFL at nazi stormfrontcel larpers on twitter and consumeproduct, thinking that if they lived in Nazi Germany they wouldn't be incel as well :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
no one has done more harm to Chad and stacies in the 30s and 40s than Nazis
That is a mistake.

The Nazis were against Jews, which they depicted as ugly. While they were worshiping Chad in their propaganda.

That indirectly empowered stacies, especially after the ridiculous end of the Nazi experiment in 1945 (the Reich of 1000 years which collapsed after 13 and a half)
 
@Diocel thoughts on stormfrontcels? :feelshehe:
 
JFL at nazi stormfrontcel larpers on twitter and consumeproduct, thinking that if they lived in Nazi Germany they wouldn't be incel as well :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
All incels would be called "Jews": Ugly --> Racially defective --> Proof that you must have semitic blood --> Gas/Oven

Nazis would have killed all Jews first (Judenrein) Then when they would have run out of Jews to gas they would have turned on the uglies (us)

In the end, the world would have been ugly-rein.
 
Last edited:
JFL at nazi stormfrontcel larpers on twitter and consumeproduct, thinking that if they lived in Nazi Germany they wouldn't be incel as well :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
Idk, do they think some prime ultra trad blonde Stacey would suck them dry in Oktoberfest lol:feelshaha::feelskek:
 
All incels would be called "Jews": Ugly --> Racially defective --> Proof that you must have semitic blood --> Gas/Oven

Nazis would have killed all Jews first (Judenrein) Then when they would have run out of Jews to gas they would have turned on the uglies (us)

In the end, the world would have been ugly-rein.
Cope, even nazi leaders had ugly people, Hitler itself wasn't some chad aryan god
 
Cope, even nazi leaders had ugly people, Hitler itself wasn't some chad aryan god
Which makes them even more ridiculous.

Second generation Nazis (like Reinhard Heydrich) were Chads. If the experiment had continued, they would have taken over
 
They're delusional. They're part of an objectivly inferior race and so they constantly have to make up shit to excuse being inferior and still be nationlists. Makes no sense to be a white nationlist. So they do the we wuzz kanggz we wuzz egyptions and shieet to try and take credit for arab accomplishments.
 
The Nazi's weren't feminists. If there is anything to learn from Nazi Germany is how conformist women are. The radical feminist roasties today would of been Nazi's in Germany in the past.
 
They're delusional. They're part of an objectivly inferior race and so they constantly have to make up shit to excuse being inferior and still be nationlists. Makes no sense to be a white nationlist. So they do the we wuzz kanggz we wuzz egyptions and shieet to try and take credit for arab accomplishments.
Huh ???
The Nazi's weren't feminists.
No, but they were Chad worshipers. When you're an incel, it does not matter if it is Chad-rule (Nazism) or Stacy-rule (Feminism). You are fucked the same
 
Last edited:
No, but they were Chad worshipers.

How is having male role models bad for young men? Hitler believed in self-improvement and was also a eugenicist. That's what the HItler Youth were all about. I dont see how this can be bad for society at all.

I dont really know what you're trying to get at here. Implying that there were more incels in Nazi Germany than there are today? There is data that proves that in the past 20 years alone inceldom is skyrocketing. It's clearly because of society changes. Incels have always existed but inceldom was obviously less of a problem in the past than is today.
 
How is having male role models bad for young men? Hitler believed in self-improvement and was also a eugenicist. That's what the HItler Youth were all about. I dont see how this can be bad for society at all.

I dont really know what you're trying to get at here. Implying that there were more incels in Nazi Germany than there are today? There is data that proves that in the past 20 years alone inceldom is skyrocketing. It's clearly because of society changes. Incels have always existed but inceldom was obviously less of a problem in the past than is today.
Nazism (like 3rd way feminism) is a cult of the strong and fuck the weak. As uglies we have to understand that we are weak. No point in deluding ourselves. Nazis would never have protected us.

Only Christianity was conscious of the necessity of protecting the weak against the strong (whether it is Chad or Stacy).
 
Second generation Nazis (like Reinhard Heydrich) were Chads. If the experiment had continued, they would have taken over
1617440441670
1617440554544
1617440579714
1617440614676


Obligatory "mogs me" but imo he was a high tier normie in looks. The oblong face and nose kind of ruin the appearance of his face and make it look less aesthetic. High hairline doesn't do any favors either. YMMV for how you'd rate him though.
 
Last edited:
Nazism (like 3rd way feminism) is a cult of the strong and fuck the weak. As uglies we have to understand that we are weak. Nazis would never have protected us.

The Nazi's encouraged every German to be strong. The boys were encouraged to work out, eat well, lift weights, learn how to shoot, hunt, read maps and have pride in Germany. They basically invented the concept of the boy scouts.

Most incels would be better off they actually believed in something other than their own personal selfish desires. Probably better off dying young fighting for something you believe in as an incel than being an edgelord that spends his entire life withering away and festering in self-pity.

I mean your entire political views are ultimately rooted in blackpill and nihilism. Basically "women are shit, burn it all down".
 
Most incels would be better off they actually believed in something other than their own personal selfish desires.
@Angry_runt thoughts?
Probably better off dying young fighting for something you believe in as an incel than being an edgelord that spends his entire life withering away and festering in self-pity.
Disagree tbh dying young still sucks.
 
Ok, let us start with the basic question: Why do we think inceldom is unfair?

If we were tribal Neolithic hunter gatherers we would find it normal to be incels. In those times, each tribe was run by the local Chad who fucked the local Stacies. As a result, there was a deficit of available women and therefore there were several incels in each tribe. They were generally called "rubbish men" or something like that according to anthropologists who studied the last remaining such tribes in Papua New Guinea at the beginning of the XXth century. Incels all right.

However, closer to us, there were societies where there were no incels. In a New England Puritain village in the 17th century, there were no Chads. Stacies were burned at the stake as witches if they acted up and chads were banished if they started "acting proud". Every man who could say his name and work with his own two hands would get a wife.

This is the baseline against which our present situation is (legitimately) considered unfair.

I am not a Chiristian (never believed in God) but I have to admit that it is Christianity that has done the most against the tyranny of Chads and Stacies and therefore helped incels the most. The Christian model is the most based model, whether we like it or not.

SJW/Woke crap started tearing apart the Christian model at the "Renaissance" and then the "Enlightenment". Then it turned into Communism. Communists were early feminists. There were women in soviet road construction crews and factories and in the Red army during WWII.

Nazism began in the early 1920s as a reaction against communism. The problem is that if you take the opposite of a bluepill, without understanding that the only based model available is Christianity, you just get another bluepill, not the blackpill. The most glaring sign of this is that Nazis worshiped chads and sort of implicitly promised that any member of the chosen race would be treated like Chad under the Nazi version of Utopia. Look at the Jaws in the images below:
View attachment 430156View attachment 430157View attachment 430158
If you worship Chad, you worship Stacy (two sides of same coin) That is why Christians were against all forms of "idolatry"

Nazis did not understand that the real an only based model was Christianity, which they rejected. What they merely did was invent a new bluepill.

Worse still, with their stupidity and failures, the Nazis empowered the feminists. Third way feminism is an inverted image of Nazi Chad worship. Girl power is a mirror image of SS power.

Thank you dumbass Nazis for making stuff worse and thank you dumbass bluepill stromfrontcels for continuing to do the same today.

TL;DR: Nazis just inverted the Woke/SJW bluepill into another bluepill by worshiping Chad
I only like the aesthetics of the uniform and the shock factor it brings, but most of the ideas (especially in the later phases of the 3rd Reich) were retarded - for example the deconstruction of marriage in a traditional sense.

I always liked the Empire from Star Wars and so I got into fascist aesthetics in my teenage years to some degree. Was/am politically right-wing but definetely not a Natsoc.

Also the edge of some figures makes room for great dark-humour jokes. I also like documentaries/literature as well as architecture/music associated with the period. Cope when somebody claims they were unaesthetic. But apart from that I agree to some degree.
 
View attachment 430167View attachment 430169View attachment 430170View attachment 430171

Obligatory "mogs me" but imo he was a high tier normie in looks. The oblong face and nose kind of ruin the appearance of his face and make it look less aesthetic. High hairline doesn't do any favors either. YMMV for how you'd rate him though.
That guy would have had no problem putting uglies in gas chambers once he had been finished with the Jews, cripples and retards. Racial purification demands it ... You must sacrifice for the good of the Nordic race; do you understand, faggot?
 
That guy would have had no problem putting uglies in gas chambers once he had been finished with the Jews, cripples and retards. Racial purification demands it ... You must sacrifice for the good of the Nordic race; do you understand, faggot?
I know that. Just saying that if rating him it's debatable if he's a chad. Aren't most tall white guys high tier normies or chadlites and not complete chads?
 
I mean your entire political views are ultimately rooted in blackpill and nihilism. Basically "women are shit, burn it all down".
Never said that.

If you want to believe in "something", that thing must be good.

If you are interested in what I believe, read this thread:
I would be ready to die for this. Easy
I know that. Just saying that if rating him it's debatable if he's a chad. Aren't most tall white guys high tier normies or chadlites and not complete chads?
Chadness standards were less strict back then. It was before Hollywood started pumping our brains full of Giga-chads 24/7 for 70 years
 
Last edited:
I would be ready to die for this. Easy
Die for what? An order of blackpilled minimalists that has special legal protections under the law?
Chadness standards were less strict back then. It was before Hollywood pumped our brains full of Giga-chads 24/7 for 70 years
Agree with that. His height alone would get him to chad level SMV back then.
 
I only like the aesthetics of the uniform and the shock factor it brings, but most of the ideas (especially in the later phases of the 3rd Reich) were retarded - for example the deconstruction of marriage in a traditional sense.

I always liked the Empire from Star Wars and so I got into fascist aesthetics in my teenage years to some degree. Was/am politically right-wing but definetely not a Natsoc.

Also the edge of some figures makes room for great dark-humour jokes. I also like documentaries/literature as well as architecture/music associated with the period. Cope when somebody claims they were unaesthetic. But apart from that I agree to some degree.
Understand but beware. There is a very thin line between aesthetic appreciation and support
 
TL;DR: Nazis just inverted the Woke/SJW bluepill into another bluepill by worshiping Chad
>inverted woke
So basically we are the opposite of lying pedophile goober bugmen? Nice

>Worshipping chad
Of course, chad is the ideal. What is your ideal?
 
that has special legal protections under the law?
"legal protection under the law" ? What do you mean ? I don't think that I ever said something that could be understood that way ...
>Worshipping chad
Of course, chad is the ideal. What is your ideal?
The Christian model (with or without God; it is not important. Personally I do not believe)

Under the Christian model, no Chads are allowed, only betas. Only one Chad is allowed, the great Sky-Chad, God.

What we could do now is transition from monotheism to zero-theism. That would involve a genuine and complete stop of Chad/Stacy worship
 
Last edited:
"legal protection under the law" ? What do you mean ? I don't think that I ever said something that could be understood that way ...
What exactly do you propose then and how is that any different from unofficial monasteries that you could form if you found blackpilled guys that agreed with you and wanted to join such a group?

Btw read this thread by BlkPillPres
 
They hate me.
Cope
The Christian model (with or without God; it is not important. Personally I do not believe)

Under the Christian model, no Chads are allowed, only betas. Only one Chad is allowed, the great Sky-Chad, God.

What we could do now is transition from monotheism to zero-theism. That would involve a genuine and complete stop of Chad/Stacy worship
Why are you so obsessed with Christianity in context with Nazis? I bet you're some south american mulatto that was mogged out of nazi chatrooms and became trad cath later on.

Why shouldnt you want to be chad? Is your ideal to be St. BlackOpsCel and stay in your room all day beacuse youre too afraid to go out, have fun, fuck and conquer the world? Damn man that sounds pathetic.
 
Last edited:
What exactly do you propose then and how is that any different from unofficial monasteries that you could form if you found blackpilled guys that agreed with you and wanted to join such a group?
What I have in mind is something very informal, like early Christianity. Just groups of guys that would meet online and agree on a certain method and lifestyle.

The "method" is necessary because we need to clean our brains before anything else. This thread is an example of the kind of things we need to clean ourselves from. There are countless others. If you are not organized and people do not help each other, you cannot do it. Early Christian "monasteries" were just guys living in caves, each by himself, and met every Sunday to discuss how they were all getting rid of the "demons" in their heads. This is already almost what we are doing on this forum. I say "almost" because we need to be just a little bit more organized about our doctrine (yes, we have to use that word) and our mental cleaning methods. Early Christianity was a form of "yoga". There is no way you can clean yourself of all the little bits and pieces of bluepill that are still lying around everywhere in your brain if you don't go about it in an organized manner.

Btw read this thread by BlkPillPres
I will. Thanks
 
What I have in mind is something very informal, like early Christianity. Just groups of guys that would meet online and agree on a certain method and lifestyle.

The "method" is necessary because we need to clean our brains before anything else. This thread is an example of the kind of things we need to clean ourselves from. There are countless others. If you are not organized and people do not help each other, you cannot do it. Early Christian "monasteries" were just guys living in caves, each by himself, and met every Sunday to discuss how they were all getting rid of the "demons" in their heads. This is already almost what we are doing on this forum. I say "almost" because we need to be just a little bit more organized about our doctrine (yes, we have to use that word) and our mental cleaning methods.
tbh doctrines aren't a bad thing. It brings to mind accusations from outsiders of inceldom being a cult and treating inceldom like a religion but already there are rules on this forum that govern how people can act and there are certain things that aren't accepted much like in a organized belief system.
Early Christianity was a form of "yoga". There is no way you can clean yourself of all the little bits and pieces of bluepill that are still lying around everywhere in your brain if you don't go about it in an organized manner.
Agree. This is a definite weakness of more vague, more open to interpretation religions like Hinduism and Buddhism where there is no strongly enforced conduct and so principles can be twisted or subverted very easily.
 
Why are you so obsessed with Christianity in context with Nazis? I bet you're some south american mulatto that was mogged out of nazi chatrooms and became trad cath later on.
Nope I am Japanese, raised in the UK, atheist

If you want to understand what I am talking about, read this:
There is no TL;DR. you have to read all of it from start to finish (all 270 pages of it)

Why shouldnt you want to be chad? Is your ideal to be St. BlackOpsCel and stay in your room all day beacuse youre too afraid to go out, have fun, fuck and conquer the world? Damn man that sounds pathetic.
@your personality : This is a good example of the kind of crap we need to purge from our brains. That is Nietzche 101 "Go ahead, you can be Chad if you dream about it hard enough". Yeah, Fat chance. The problem is that we have been conditioned so hard to believe in that kind of nonsense that it takes a lot of work to root it out.
 
@your personality : This is a good example of the kind of crap we need to purge from our brains. That is Nietzche 101 "Go ahead, you can be Chad if you dream about it hard enough". Yeah, Fat chance. The problem is that we have been conditioned so hard to believe in that kind of nonsense that it takes a lot of work to root it out.
I agree. The only thing that makes a chad is good looks and sexual appeal to women stemming from those looks.
 
tbh doctrines aren't a bad thing. It brings to mind accusations from outsiders of inceldom being a cult and treating inceldom like a religion but already there are rules on this forum that govern how people can act and there are certain things that aren't accepted much like in a organized belief system.
Inceldom is an emerging religious movement, whatever we decide to call it. A religious approach is the only way, tested and validated by past human experience, to do something about Inceldom.

Agree. This is a definite weakness of more vague, more open to interpretation religions like Hinduism and Buddhism where there is no strongly enforced conduct and so principles can be twisted or subverted very easily.
The first 5 centuries of Christianity were just one long and hugely painstaking effort to clarify what it all meant. We will have to go through the same process to clarify what the blackpill really means.
 
You are two levels away from understanding how nazism is truly a foid worship ideology. Here's the first one.

Propaganda is an idea that the minority wants to "show" the majority whether it's true or not. You got yourself trapped on that nazi propaganda but just like every other propaganda it uses the argument of authority of the gatekeeper of sex (gatekeeper is a greater power than just sex) as their headline , in other word : Chad. "Sex sells" because normies are the ones targeted.
You praise Christianity and yet it uses the same propaganda, despite being a virgin Jesus is a white Chad. You gotta talk about what the actual ideas are and not about their propaganda.
You think nazis rejected Christianity because they were somehow bluepillers, ignorant, whatever but historically Christianity has done more harm than good to white people like useless internal fighting during the crusades and the fall of Rome in which Christianity promoted many privileges for (them), like a trojan horse.
Nazis perform roman salutes, they obviously wouldn't be fans of christianity pushed by Constantine which ruined the roman empire.

Nazism is not only a reaction about communism but about (them) as a whole because history keeps repeating itself. it's individuals gathering together against a (tribe) in order to compete and survive. Kinda like the avengers when you think about it with their marvel mythology (eg: Thor) :feelskek:

Now the actual reason why they are foid worshipers :
Is that the core idea of national socialism and the way they reject Christianity is because of Frya, her bloodline(=white people) is called Fryana then it became Aryana(Aryan)
So why a woman's bloodline? Other than the fact that women represent fertility it's because despite more males being born on average (105 males born for every 100 females) the majority of your ancestors are females because of the 20/80 rule, very few men could breed unlike females.
The ones that weren't strong enough wouldn't have survived so they cannot possibly be your ancestors. Worshiping your DNA is worshiping your successful ancestors and their strategy such as Chad and a majority of women.
In other words, worshiping your DNA and ancestors is foid worship.
 
Inceldom is an emerging religious movement, whatever we decide to call it. A religious approach is the only way, tested and validated by past human experience, to do something about Inceldom.
Imo a lot of former Christians and Muslims here have said they can no longer believe in all parts of their religion since discovering the blackpill. So tbh in that way the blackpill is already a fairly rigid system of beliefs. The central tenet is that looks and things that complement looks (like being NT) are everything.
The first 5 centuries of Christianity were just one long and huge effort to clarify what it meant. We will have to go through the same process to clarify what the blackpill means.
The way philosophers would do this is by having debates and mean testing ideas.
From the Credit Masturbation book and views you have expressed before I understand this approach isn't something you see favorably.
If so, what do you suggest that the process to clarify things would involve instead?
 
@your personality : This is a good example of the kind of crap we need to purge from our brains. That is Nietzche 101 "Go ahead, you can be Chad if you dream about it hard enough". Yeah, Fat chance. The problem is that we have been conditioned so hard to believe in that kind of nonsense that it takes a lot of work to root it out.
I agree. The only thing that makes a chad is good looks and sexual appeal to women stemming from those looks.
Wrong, you can say Lil Peep was a chad since he was a skinny prettyboy that women liked, also he was popular and rich. You could call him sucessful. Yet this is not my definition of chad since he lacks maniless, power and strength.

You may won't get women, but you can still suceed in nearly all other areas of life and if you make that you can even get women despite being ugly and short, see Goebbels or Himmler. But you can keep bitching and work towards your ideal of becomming a weak lamb of god that is at the mercy of the strong and vital.
How is it cope?
Most of my favorite users here are ethnics :feelswhat:
 
Wrong, you can say Lil Peep was a chad since he was a skinny prettyboy that women liked, also he was popular and rich. You could call him sucessful. Yet this is not my definition of chad since he lacks maniless, power and strength.
Not all chads have a sufficient amount of manliness, power and strength to be thought of as manly by most men though. There's feminine pretty boy chads (kpop, some rappers) and then there's masculine chads.
You may won't get women, but you can still suceed in nearly all other areas of life and if you make that you can even get women despite being ugly and short, see Goebbels or Himmler. But you can keep bitching and work towards your ideal of becomming a weak lamb of god that is at the mercy of the strong and vital.
Doing that would be succeeding in a standard of masculinity that is universally agreed upon as a show of strength and manliness but imo that's still not synonymous with chad. Being a chad depends on having the good looks required to be physically attractive to women.
 
Not all chads have a sufficient amount of manliness, power and strength to be thought of as manly by most men though. There's feminine pretty boy chads (kpop, some rappers) and then there's masculine chads.

Doing that would be succeeding in a standard of masculinity that is universally agreed upon as a show of strength and manliness but imo that's still not synonymous with chad. Being a chad depends on having the good looks required to be physically attractive to women.
So whats the point? No matter if you go by genetics or mindset, being a chad is always an advantage and nothing wrong about it. Every ideology that promotes being weak and ugly is either fucking retarded or straight out designed by your enemies to corrupt you.
 
Imo a lot of former Christians and Muslims here have said they can no longer believe in all parts of their religion since discovering the blackpill.
I agree. You cannot believe in the Sky Chad anymore because it is precisely too obvious now that this belief was a (successful) effort to thwart Chad/Stacy tyranny. We cannot hide behind that metaphor anymore. But what we can do now is construct something equivalent. Before we reach that goal we have to:
  1. Dissect Christianity to understand how it really worked deep down and not just how it looked on the surface.
  2. Hatch a method to achieve something similar. Trial and error will have to be done here, just as it was done by early Christians.

The way philosophers would do this is by having debates and mean testing ideas. From the Credit Masturbation book and views you have expressed before I understand this approach isn't something you see favorably. If so, what do you suggest that the process to clarify things would involve instead?
I don't like "philosophers" because they are not honest. They pretend to debate but they never want to reach any conclusion. After looking at them doing this for a while and wondering why, I finally figured out that what they like is just strutting on the stage and getting the attention. Deep down, they don't really give a fuck about what they are talking about. It is just a pretext to shine in public.

We need to avoid that pitfall and work like early Christians. Augustine, Origen, John Chrysostom and all those guys were trained in classical philosophy but they understood that at one point the discussion must stop and you have to reach a conclusion that has a bearing on actual practice. Otherwise it is just endless masturbation.
 
So whats the point? No matter if you go by genetics or mindset, being a chad is always an advantage and nothing wrong about it.
Nothing good or bad about it is what my point is. Some guys grow up to have chad looks and some don't. Chads are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye for everyone in comparison to other men but that's as far as their inherent features go. Some chads are nice guys. Some chads are assholes. But implying that chads have something inherently better about them that goes beyond their good looks is imo just chad worship.
Every ideology that promotes being weak and ugly is either fucking retarded or straight out designed by your enemies to corrupt you.
But I didn't say being weak and ugly is good. Just that the question of whether a man is a chad or not is solely dependent on their looks, which in turn determines the amount of raw sexual attraction women possess toward them.

I agree. You cannot believe in the Sky Chad anymore because it is precisely too obvious now that this belief was a (successful) effort to thwart Chad/Stacy tyranny. We cannot hide behind that metaphor anymore. But what we can do now is construct something equivalent. Before we reach that goal we have to:
  1. Dissect Christianity to understand how it really worked deep down and not just how it looked on the surface.
  2. Hatch a method to achieve something similar. Trial and error will have to be done here, just as it was done by early Christians.
Putting step 2. into practice is going to be a more difficult step than step 1. imo.
I don't like "philosophers" because they are not honest. They pretend to debate but they never want to reach any conclusion. After looking at them doing this for a while and wondering why, I finally figured out that what they like is just strutting on the stage and getting the attention. Deep down, they don't really give a fuck about what they are talking about. It is just a pretext to shine in public.
You see this all the time with redditors. They just argue for the sake of arguing just to sound smart or woke.
We need to avoid that pitfall and work like early Christians. Augustine, Origen, John Chrysostom and all those guys were trained in classical philosophy but they understood that at one point the discussion must stop and you have to reach a conclusion that has a bearing on actual practice. Otherwise it is just endless masturbation.
Yeah dwelling on the theoretical instead of the practical is an endless series of what-if questions that are only useful in passing the time when there is nothing else to do. Imo from what I understand so far a utilitarian approach has to be taken toward constructing something similar to Christianity but without the central godhead.
 
Last edited:
They have there perfect aryan but in reality lots of nazis where clearly physically inferior, look at Goebbles and Himmler but had full respect
 
You may won't get women, but you can still suceed in nearly all other areas of life and if you make that you can even get women despite being ugly and short, see Goebbels or Himmler. But you can keep bitching and work towards your ideal of becomming a weak lamb of god that is at the mercy of the strong and vital.
That is complete utter bluepill Nietzche/Ayn Rand/Napoleon Hill horseshit. What makes it even more hilarious is the references to Himmler and Goebbels that float in the middle of the garbage.
Jew ? I am Japanese.
 
Most of the nazis are incels or almost incels. One of the first thing cops ask in the not-so-free world to nazis who get caught spitting truth on the internet is "are you an incel?".

Actually, they are pretty based when you think of their beliefs about jews. Jews always have been the problem in societies.
 
They have there perfect aryan but in reality lots of nazis where clearly physically inferior, look at Goebbles and Himmler but had full respect
If the thing had lasted longer and Heydrich types had had the time to take over, things would have changed quickly. Uglies would have followed the Jews, retards and cripples into the gas chambers. See, when you run a bullshit regime like the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, you need to keep finding reasons why it is not Utopia yet. When you have finished gassing a category of "enemies", you have to move on to the next.
 
Nothing good or bad about it is what my point is. Some guys grow up to have chad looks and some don't. Chads are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye for everyone in comparison to other men but that's as far as their inherent features go. Some chads are nice guys. Some chads are assholes. But implying that chads have something inherently better about them that goes beyond their good looks is imo just chad worship.
Sure, you cannot define a whole persons life though their looks. But you gotta admit that looks says a lot about how you life your life, how seriously you take health, sport and hygiene, basically how they respect themselves and how disciplined they are. I see nothing wrong in being prideful of your body, either having it given by birth or by dedicated work in the gym. Same with academic achievements.
But I didn't say being weak and ugly is good. Just that the question of whether a man is a chad or not is solely dependent on their looks, which in turn determines the amount of raw sexual attraction women possess toward them.
K9Otaku kinda did. Since he is so into Christianity I think he wants to be weak since he feels ashamed for strength and independence.
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
9
Views
550
underballer
U
FinestHour
Replies
7
Views
172
bruhwtf
bruhwtf
undertaker77
Replies
11
Views
618
boneless goblin
boneless goblin
Yabadadabadoo
Replies
11
Views
644
Jar Jar Binks
Jar Jar Binks
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
10
Views
269
Grodd
Grodd

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top