I don't have hope. I'm just against kike supported chad/stacy worshipping. I support genetic engineering and enforced monogamy.
I, for one, support individual freedom and responsibilities.
1: Polyamorous relationships are on the rise. And it's one man with many girlfriends.
If true (I suspect it's mostly pushed by medias but not demographically significant), then I'm fine with it. Again, as long as these families don't get any kind of welfare.
I care about other children, because I want to change society and destroy feminism and hypERgamy. I support massive changes in education and welfare.
www.pewresearch.org
This is an article about contemporary matrimony. The current prevalence of monogamy only represents a tiny part of our anthropological history.Polygamy is rare around the world and mostly confined to a few regions
In some countries – particularly in a segment of West and Central Africa – polygamy is frequently legal and widespread.
It is possible that this is only part of a long cycle, where societies go through phases. Kind of like with the saying :
We don't have any evidence of polygamous societies thriving. At best, they'll be barely stable with the majority of men suffering in silence. Also, most polyamorous couples happen in the West (and some thrid-world African countries). Strict monogamous people tend to have higher birth rates, which will lead to monogamy returning back to being enforced. Demography is destiny.
Nice Appeal to authority, but still there is this genetic analysis that showed that few tens of thousand years ago, only a very few fraction of males were reproducing.
Sorry but you’re exaggeratingI have been lurking on this forum for a long time and I have observed that many incels have a misconception that all the men born under sharia live like kings,when in reality you are born as a slave to women.Being born as a muslim woman is like life on tutorial mode,you have to provide for her your entire life,if she does work then you'd have no right over her money,but you have to work like a pig to provide for her needs and wants,she is entitled to all your money.They don't work at all and still get half of the inheritance and they are not obligated to spend it on anyone but themselves.Under Sharia,women(or foids?)can also share Chad.Everything in life is given to you on a platter,in many arab countries like saudi arabia , a lot of women don't even do the household chores,they have a maidmisconception for that,men have to work hard for it.Also if you thought you could get away with beating your foid,then you are wrong,her simp father and brothers will break your bones,and your reputation would be destroyed.When I was in saudi arabia,I had to stand on the bus because the seats were reserved for womenonly!And the worst part is even if you work hard,if the father of the girl doesn't like you ,then you can't get married.
and you have to pay a "mehr" a dowry to the woman to marry her in which they ask for your entire year's salary.Because of this even in muslim countries ,there are many 30 year old virgins
Tbh you are right,its betterSorry but you’re exaggerating
[UWSL]But just the fact :[/UWSL]
That women can not invade male space
They are not in your worklplace
There are no metoo
My ear are free from their constant nagging on patriarchy
Make it a far better place than western pussy worshippers
Most men who work will find a spouse in Islamic word period
than the westHowever it must suck to be in places like qatar where there are 4 men for 1 foid,still its better than western degeneracy,if there is degeneracy, muslims don't embrace itSorry but you’re exaggerating
[UWSL]But just the fact :[/UWSL]
That women can not invade male space
They are not in your worklplace
There are no metoo
My ear are free from their constant nagging on patriarchy
Make it a far better place than western pussy worshippers
Most men who work will find a spouse in Islamic word period
It's true that we have about twice as many female ancestors compared to male ancestors. The reason for that however is mostly because a very large part of the male population died off when wars happened. Plus more male babies die at birth. Add hunting incidents in hunter-gatherer societies. It's true that it's women who choose men, but actual patriarchal societies have always existed. If women selected chads hundreds of thousands of years ago, incels wouldn't exist today.
These are not very convincing explanations, IMHO. They don't seem sufficient from a quantitative point of view. For instance if it's true that male babies die more often at birth, I doubt it's that significant a difference (or it would translate as a skewed sex ratio in the adult population).
incels.is
