View attachment 667998View attachment 668000
pictures of the dead foidlet
I know some of you frequent /pol/ far more often than I do so that's why I'm asking here. I mean, what's the big fucking deal about it? Why is it that, despite the fact that men are more likely to die from homicide than women are, cuckservatives end up feeding a disproportionate level of media attention to femoid deaths?
The Stormfags seem pretty riled up about this. For context, before this girl's murder, the last time I saw this cartoon was back in 2016 or 2017. But I've seen it twice on Twitter over the last week, and Twitter is filled with fucking normies:
View attachment 667999
The misandrist irony of course is that this cartoon depicts ethnicels as rapists despite the fact that it was a femoid doing the raping in this case.
For those who haven't heard, a 24-year-old Algerian foid raped, tortured, and killed a 12-year-old French girl and stuffed her body in a suitcase. That's pretty much it. The empathetic gender indeed.
President Emmanuel Macron pays tribute to the family of Lola whose body was found in a plastic trunk.
www.bbc.com
Family speak out after photo of 12-year-old, identified only as ‘Lola’, was displayed at far-right rally
www.theguardian.com
Identity politics.
That term is used to describe something concrete, we associate it with a decorum of behaviour, set of rules and almost rituals that are considered correct to follow, exalted to the rank of customs even, between groups in a fixed set — that set can always be called minorities. It isn't a modern thing. We just gave it more weight and therefore the whole act of today's identity politics seems fresh and not a thing that always was there. The objective schematic (that social phenomenon we call identity politics) that exists between members of said set is the reason for that anger.
Thing is, the behaviours and reactions to actions is solely determined by characteristics of the groups: which one is more fortunate, which one is wealthier, stronger, more intelligent, has a better location; grudges, history, cultural output, crimes committed, abuse... (advantages and disadvantages)
And you put that information into the objective schematic that is identity politics, and depending on the group you get a different answer under circumstances like the one you gave (emotions, what values were struck, reaction etc)
How does it work in practice? Like that (my teacher taught me the following method):
The right wing ideologies care about Race/nation. They also care about religion and its interpretation subordinated to the self imposed practical goal of the nation, so that making politics can be called a holy duty and be happy they are doing their part. You know, the whole calling yourself soldiers of christ, crusaders shit like that which satisfies their spiritual hunger.
Their ideology determines their identity. So, in their case, we have to apply the ideology into the schematic and get our answer. Before that...
...Ok, we got two/three themes, religion and race/nation. Let's cross them, and the crosspoint will be a question, it is best to ask open questions, let's get a few:
- How can religion help the interest of the race/nation?
- Since races exist, and races are different, what religion suits my race/nation best?
- When religion matters more than the race/nation?
Ok. three is for some reason that "nice" number.
Now, its very important to know, what are the answers to these question that their ideology gives. It doesn't matter if I agree with it or not, its time we kill our personality and turn on critical thinking on.
1. Religion confines its members to merry the people of same religion, this way we can ensure the members of our race/nation will merry among its members and procreate pure offspring. (That's the ideal. Most members here see religion instrumentally because it allows controlling foids and decreases the number of incels and therefore male suffering. )
2. Obviously the one you already have because it's a necessary part of your culture that your race produced/nation has built | The one before, some pagan shit about reclaiming identity | One that values strength, brutality etc. religion should exist for the myth to keep the nationalist zeal up.
3. Depends. The neo-falangists in my country claim God>Nation and yet call themselves nationalist (that the nation is the highest value) and explain:
god is the highest spiritual value while the nation is the highest material value. There are obvious conflicts that make this hierarchy unstable. They're basically saying, that they stepped into shit, it stuck, helped to fight off some wolves with its stench on the way, and they're sympathetic to it now and they won't wash it away.
And you can have thousands of themes to pull out from their worldview, make these questions, get your naswers, look at what happened, as see where it conflicts with the theses. All of this is the answer to your
why.
Simply saying: The foreign (they're xenophobic) racially inferior foid (the protagonist, for patriarchy fans its already a grave sin) raped (homosexuality, defilement of our member by that of another group, racial element, impurity) and then murdered (total war) a 12 year old (striking a child).
I and you, we get angry when stuff is done we don't like. Because the order we want is destroyed (the point of the questions above, that draw the order out for them was disrespected). For them it was the same, but far more important and plays a vital part in the fight for what they believe is survival. They lost the fight, the event was a testimony of their powerlessness. It shattered them, that's why they themselves felt it.
What makes them believe what they believe in? Idk.
Tldr:
identity politics + ideology
