RageFuel Why is it that some of you think that Chad litreally has "Superior" genetics?

[Lookscel]

Someone explain me this. Why do some le blackpillers take the "subhuman" thing litreally. Like they legitimately think that Chad has some form of superior genetics and we have legitimately have "inferior genetics"?

Do these people ever realise that just because they have extra millimetres of bone in their face and extra bones somewhere else doesn't mean that they are "superior"?

Also foids judge people based on looks and these "blackpillers" seethe about it.

Then they go on to judge everyone based on looks, saying Chad has "superior genetics" and call themselves Blackpilled. Do they not see their hypocrisy?

All those Chad more intelligent blah blah can be summarized as a result of continuous positive reinforcement

Not to forget scientists and engineers that have built the civilization actually have a reputation of being ugly. So of you stop viewing the world from a foids point of view, you might actually come to the conclusion that ugly people have "superior genetics" .

 

[Nigerlozi]

ever heard of natural selection?

 

[Transcended Trucel]

aesthetically Chad does mog us. In my case somewhat health wise too

 

[Saint Cho]

Because the primary directive of every organism on the planet is the continuation of their genetics. For humans, the most reproductively successful men are chads, so their genetics are the best for the current times.

 

[MinorityNoOneCares]

Because, Chad DOES have superior genetics.

 

[mentally lost cel 1]

Someone explain me this. Why do some le blackpillers take the "subhuman" thing litreally. Like they legitimately think that Chad has some form of superior genetics and we have legitimately have "inferior genetics"?

Do these people ever realise that just because they have extra millimetres of bone in their face and extra bones somewhere else doesn't mean that they are "superior"?

Also foids judge people based on looks and these "blackpillers" seethe about it.

Then they go on to judge everyone based on looks, saying Chad has "superior genetics" and call themselves Blackpilled. Do they not see their hypocrisy?

All those Chad more intelligent blah blah can be summarized as a result of continuous positive reinforcement

Not to forget scientists and engineers that have built the civilization actually have a reputation of being ugly. So of you stop viewing the world from a foids point of view, you might actually come to the conclusion that ugly people have "superior genetics" .

In my case they do in fact have better genes

 

[CIA nigger]

if chad has a low iq he is inferior. iq is the biggest indicator of genetic superiority in humans

 

[mistersinister]

thank god I don't need to do guokao, some poeple spend 7 years on that and become mad, my family is moderately wealthy so thank god for my parents, I don't want to waste 7 years on that BS

 

[Lookscel]

ever heard of natural selection?

Because the primary directive of every organism on the planet is the continuation of their genetics. For humans, the most reproductively successful men are chads, so their genetics are the best for the current times.

Two arm chair biologists. Nice. One doesn't knows the actual definition of selection and another has discovered a primary directive of every organism.

I'm not going to even bother explaining this. Go and read an textbook on evolution and see what selection actually means and what the directive of every organism is ( if you can find one that is ).

Well, it makes them superior in getting woman for sure. I really do not understand what you mean. They are far far better at something. This is the very definition of superior.

This criteria is based on foids who themselves are retarded as rocks. Can't take this seriously.

Bad genetics come in packages and vice versa. It's just more likely for a men with superior looks to have superior intelligence too than for an ugly man.

A quick Google search on link between health and depression gave me this

https://www.mdlinx.com/article/exploring-the-link-between-mental-health-and-cardiovascular-disease/6Jl5jjdXYxeGg0sZPSPggs

You see many such links exist out there. Something like bad grades and depression/loneliness being linked together isn't surprising when you think about it.

A man becomes depressed/sad/lonely because he is made fun of and looked as inferior because of his looks and then ( from what you see from these linkages) he does worse in every aspect.

In chads life it's opposite, he has positive reinforcement every moment and that's why he succeeds.

Just how hard is it to understand? This is why I don't like this forum now it's like talking to someone with intellect of an insect who thinks he is the next Aristotle.

Because, Chad DOES have superior genetics.

Foid tier behavior

 

[Saint Cho]

Two arm chair biologists. Nice. One doesn't knows the actual definition of selection and another has discovered a primary directive of every organism.

I'm not going to even bother explaining this. Go and read an textbook on evolution and see what selection actually means and what the directive of every organism is ( if you can find one that is ).

 

[mistersinister]

So you are saying, that chad experiences success due to people having been nice to him, as a result of his looks?
How do you not see you inherently flawed that logic is?
He succeeds because he has superior genetics. No matter how much positive reinforcement you throw at a retard, he won't succeed.
I am not saying that it has no effect, but it's just hilarious to claim that this is the actual reason for the success.

 

[I.N.C.E.L.S. Boss]

if chad has a low iq he is inferior. iq is the biggest indicator of genetic superiority in humans

 

[Adamhastor]

Superior in a Hegelian sense, not in a Darwinian one

 

[MinorityNoOneCares]

Foid tier behavior

IQ of 160. Masters degree in chemical engineering from two universities. 4th dan black belt & former European champ in Kyokushin karate. In addition to acting, body builder, and model.

Admitting that Dolph Lundgren won the genetic lottery, is not foid behaviour.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Someone explain me this. Why do some le blackpillers take the "subhuman" thing litreally. Like they legitimately think that Chad has some form of superior genetics and we have legitimately have "inferior genetics"?

Do these people ever realise that just because they have extra millimetres of bone in their face and extra bones somewhere else doesn't mean that they are "superior"?

Also foids judge people based on looks and these "blackpillers" seethe about it.

Then they go on to judge everyone based on looks, saying Chad has "superior genetics" and call themselves Blackpilled. Do they not see their hypocrisy?

All those Chad more intelligent blah blah can be summarized as a result of continuous positive reinforcement

Not to forget scientists and engineers that have built the civilization actually have a reputation of being ugly. So of you stop viewing the world from a foids point of view, you might actually come to the conclusion that ugly people have "superior genetics" .

This is something I've argued too, but too many people on this forum are obsessed with memes and they lack the ability to think about things abstractly.

A lot of you guys haven't worked some of the jobs I have so you may not know it, but tall guys start getting problems with their knees really early, like from 30 up, and when they are old (50+) it's kinda funny the shit they go through and how they struggle to walk. Whereas all the short old guys of the same age I've seen are spry and walk normally, no problems at all.

There are advantages and disadvantageous to different genetic traits.

Also a lot of you guys forget about the "Fisherian Runaway Theory". If women keep breeding exclusively for tall genetics, you are going to get taller and taller men, with weaker and weaker arm and knee joints (especially knees), and that isn't good for "survival" at all now is it?

Ironically by arguing that Chad is superior just because women want to fuck him, you are arguing that women are the ones that determine the worth of the species, when it's men that have built literally everything.

Never forget that women don't have any power, it's power by proxy, it's male power.

Every woman that tells you that she can say and do what she wants is doing this with the image of a invisible man with a gun standing behind her and willing to protect her. Women don't have rights without men collectively agreeing that they have rights.

 

[HateCurry]

Someone explain me this. Why do some le blackpillers take the "subhuman" thing litreally. Like they legitimately think that Chad has some form of superior genetics and we have legitimately have "inferior genetics"?

Yes, we do have inferior genetics when it comes to sexual selection and women's preference for men.

Do these people ever realise that just because they have extra millimetres of bone in their face and extra bones somewhere else doesn't mean that they are "superior"?

Who are you referring to? Your bone structure does define attractiveness by some extent. They are indeed superior in terms of genes for an offspring, they can guarantee your child will breed, if you both have a child.

Also foids judge people based on looks and these "blackpillers" seethe about it.

Indeed we do.

Then they go on to judge everyone based on looks, saying Chad has "superior genetics" and call themselves Blackpilled. Do they not see their hypocrisy?

There is no hyprocrisy. We blackpillers don't see ourselves as some holier than the average human who doesn't judge people based on their looks. I acknowldge I do judge people by looks to an extent.

I never claimed I do not.

All those Chad more intelligent blah blah can be summarized as a result of continuous positive reinforcement

Not to forget scientists and engineers that have built the civilization actually have a reputation of being ugly. So of you stop viewing the world from a foids point of view, you might actually come to the conclusion that ugly people have "superior genetics" .

The main flaw you have in this argument is you summarize natural selection in the same box as sexual selection.

That's very misleading and a strawman really.

When we say "inferior genetics" or "superior genetics" we mean not in terms of intelligence, but in terms of looks.

Also, good looking people do on average get more positive feedback and are a few IQ points higher than their unattractive counterparts. A good looking person who's poor living on the street is very likely to be more intelligent compared to an unattractive guy who was born in the hands of wealthy, rich parents who are doctors and so on, many careers.

I'll link a video down below to one my favorite youtuber who covered this at length.



The main thing I have to say about this, this is a strawman. When we say that we mean in terms of sexual selection not natural. Don't get it twisted please.