Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why is all female music, even south korean k-pop, about the theme of "I'm so hot and you're a trash male"

bcuz 80% of the time its true maybe?
 
Because they're noodlewhores in riceland. They hate rice (the majority of men they see) and see most males as trash beneath them. It's not surprising that it's the main theme of their songs.
 
Don't get shit confused nigga. When they say they are above men they mean they are above everyone who isn't Chad and they say this to empower girls who got their hearts broken by Chad so they would feel like they could get better JFL
 
they say that then later find themselves being choked and anally gaped by 8 chads calling them whores.
 
yeah and also to encourage females to think they all deserve chad no matter how they look. makes em entitled and if they have to date a normie they'll treat him like shit
 
Last edited:
I do not listen to that type of music
 
You have a very trash taste in music that is not a music is females complaining shits to ricecels
 
Because most men are indeed worthless trash to them. It's all about muh empowerment and their unrestricted ability to live whorish lives. It revolves SOLELY around their unlimited smv in the modern society, there's really nothing more to it. Just one vagina to rule thousands of penises.
 
Are they viewing kattradhians over there?
 
Don't get shit confused nigga. When they say they are above men they mean they are above everyone who isn't Chad and they say this to empower girls who got their hearts broken by Chad so they would feel like they could get better JFL

Yeah. "I'm happier being single anyway!" (Until chad drunk texts them at 4am one night and they go rushing to his house)
 
yeah and also to encourage females to think they all deserve chad no matter how they look. makes em entitled and if they have to date a normie they'll treat him like shit
Tbh. Normies aren’t doing to well either
Yeah. "I'm happier being single anyway!" (Until chad drunk texts them at 4am one night and they go rushing to his house)
Tbh
 
In the vast majority of cases, it's a man writting the music and the lyrics.
 
No modern female or female musical group has even 1/10th the talent and sheer poise, grace and class as the late Aaliyah.

They’re all just trash singing about trash basically.

View: https://youtu.be/WVMcIEPZ9YY
 
In the vast majority of cases, it's a man writting the music and the lyrics.

It was a man that made the "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" t-shirt.
A lot of guys feel the need to hate on other guys to prove a point or draw attention to themselves.
 
It was a man that made the "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" t-shirt.
A lot of guys feel the need to hate on other guys to prove a point or draw attention to themselves.
Yup. Cucks are way worse than women. Women only have as much leeway as men allow them to.
 
Yup. Cucks are way worse than women. Women only have as much leeway as men allow them to.

No women are just as bad.
It's just that there are obviously a lot of men that have no problem literally throwing other men under the bus and sacrificing their lives for the possibility of mere approval (not even pussy, just mere approval) of women.

Even if all men unite, watch how quickly even the self-proclaimed "non-feminist" women become rabid and break down if there is ever serious efforts to do things like: making women sign up for the possibility to be drafted or be imprisoned just like men are, making women sign up for being drafted in order to vote just like men are, undoing of alimony, repeal of domestic violence laws where a man shouting is considered assault, prohibiting women from making the decision to circumcise their sons, making paternity testing at birth mandatory with penalties for the mother for evading this, making it so that men that are not the biological father don't have to pay child support for a child that is not theirs (interferes with women's dual mating strategy)...

just to name a few.
 
No women are just as bad.
It's just that there are obviously a lot of men that have no problem literally throwing other men under the bus and sacrificing their lives for the possibility of mere approval (not even pussy, just mere approval) of women.

Even if all men unite, watch how quickly even the self-proclaimed "non-feminist" women become rabid and break down if there is ever serious efforts to do things like: making women sign up for the possibility to be drafted or be imprisoned just like men are, making women sign up for being drafted in order to vote just like men are, undoing of alimony, repeal of domestic violence laws where a man shouting is considered assault, prohibiting women from making the decision to circumcise their sons, making paternity testing at birth mandatory with penalties for the mother for evading this, making it so that men that are not the biological father don't have to pay child support for a child that is not theirs (interferes with women's dual mating strategy)...

just to name a few.
But my point is that things are only that bad with women because men allowed it to be this way. It doesn't matter if women oppose it, if all men wanted to put women back in their place in society, it would happen.
 
But my point is that things are only that bad with women because men allowed it to be this way. It doesn't matter if women oppose it, if all men wanted to put women back in their place in society, it would happen.

I kind of disagree. Women are more ruthless and cunning than a lot of men give them credit for.
Female suffragettes engaged in terrorism to get their message across. Women have cheered on incidents like Lorena Bobbit severing her now ex-husband's penis.

If you see reaction videos of what happens if a man hits a woman, just as many women step in as whiteknights and physically assault the man that hit a woman with ten times as much fervor.

Men putting women back in their place wholesale would mean exiling, imprisoning or executing radical feminists that demonstrate they are determined to hurt low SMV males or have clearly advocated doing so in the past and have not expressed remorse, imprisoning hypocritical "non-feminist" women who protest against the rollback of women's special treatment and the rollback of rights women got at the expense of men, censoring or exiling any people that are sympathetic to feminism, gynocentrism or being a tradcuck and barring all other women from interacting with each other or anyone on social media or the internet, participating in tv media, business and politics.
In short, only a few women would be left in free society if men were to really put women back in their place.
 
I kind of disagree. Women are more ruthless and cunning than a lot of men give them credit for.
Female suffragettes engaged in terrorism to get their message across. Women have cheered on incidents like Lorena Bobbit severing her now ex-husband's penis.

If you see reaction videos of what happens if a man hits a woman, just as many women step in as whiteknights and physically assault the man that hit a woman with ten times as much fervor.

Men putting women back in their place wholesale would mean exiling, imprisoning or executing radical feminists that demonstrate they are determined to hurt low SMV males or have clearly advocated doing so in the past and have not expressed remorse, imprisoning hypocritical "non-feminist" women who protest against the rollback of women's special treatment and the rollback of rights women got at the expense of men, censoring or exiling any people that are sympathetic to feminism, gynocentrism or being a tradcuck and barring all other women from interacting with each other or anyone on social media or the internet, participating in tv media, business and politics.
In short, only a few women would be left in free society if men were to really put women back in their place.
Women are born conformists, there are only so many feminists nowadays because that's the status quo. If you asked around about feminist stuff 100 years ago most women would have said that feminism is preposterous and women should not be whores, treat men like shit, etc. If society changed radically and men started stomping feminism, the same would happen in a couple of decades.
 
Women are born conformists, there are only so many feminists nowadays because that's the status quo. If you asked around about feminist stuff 100 years ago most women would have said that feminism is preposterous and women should not be whores, treat men like shit, etc.

No I disagree. Women have always disliked low SMV males and were only pretending to like submitting or even associating with them in the form of sexual relationships.
Women are the reason feminism arose.
 
No I disagree. Women have always disliked low SMV males and were only pretending to like submitting or even associating with them in the form of sexual relationships.
Women are the reason feminism arose.
You can say they were pretending, just like most men pretend not to find underage sexually developed girls attractive nowadays. Still, it works in practice. Not many adult men are daring to try fucking underage women nowadays, just as most women were also behaving decades ago, before feminism got popular and became the status quo.

If things like hypergamy, hybristophilia and promiscuity were as shunned and had as serious consequences as male pedo/hebephilia does, I doubt many women would be pursuing them even though they would still desire it.
 
Last edited:
You can say they were pretending, just like most men pretend not to find underage sexually developed girls attractive nowadays. Still, it works in practice. Not many adult men are daring to try fucking underage women nowadays, just as most women were also behaving decades ago, before feminism got popular and became the status quo.

If things like hypergamy, hybristophilia and promiscuity were as shunned as pedophilia, I doubt many women would be doing it even though they would still desire it.

I don't want to go back to those kinds of days and live a lie. I'm glad women are open about their disdain for men they find unattractive nowadays.
Repressing women when they have clearly demonstrated that they are not okay with it and will look for the first opportunity to take revenge on all men for this just means risking going through another cycle of gynocentric traditionalism followed by feminism in the future
@NoCopeNoHope
 
I don't want to go back to those kinds of days and live a lie. I'm glad women are open about their disdain for men they find unattractive nowadays.
Repressing women when they have clearly demonstrated that they are not okay with it and will look for the first opportunity to take revenge on all men for this just means risking going through another cycle of gynocentric traditionalism followed by feminism in the future
@NoCopeNoHope
Unfortunately, many things in society only work if people are forced to do them. I doubt most people who work in things like sewer maintenance or mining would do these things if they weren't forced by the fact they have to eat and support their families and can't really get better jobs. Likewise, most people are not monogamous to the point they want to only have one partner throughout their whole lives. Still, marriage is proven to be the most benefitial sexual arrangement for society.

Things like women obeying the authority of men would also be required for an optimal functioning of society, too bad this one stopped being enforced.
 
Unfortunately, many things in society only work if people are forced to do them. I doubt most people who work in things like sewer maintenance or mining would do these things if they weren't forced by the fact they have to eat and support their families and can't really get better jobs. Likewise, most people are not monogamous to the point they want to only have one partner throughout their whole lives. Still, marriage is proven to be the most benefitial sexual arrangement for society.

Things like women obeying the authority of men would also be required for an optimal functioning of society, too bad this one stopped being enforced.

Marriage is most beneficial for raising chidren in a stable two parent household imo.
It should become mainstream knowledge that you shouldn't have male children if they are not likely genetics wise to grow up to be tall and objectively good looking in today's world.
Male children that fall short of this standard will live a life suffering that they may only realize too late after they can't help but see how much better good looking males and even better looking normies are treated by them.

Btw @BlkPillPres do you agree that in order for men to put women back in their place

"would mean exiling, imprisoning or executing radical feminists that demonstrate they are determined to hurt low SMV males or have clearly advocated doing so in the past and have not expressed remorse, imprisoning hypocritical "non-feminist" women who protest against the rollback of women's special treatment and the rollback of rights women got at the expense of men, censoring or exiling any people that are sympathetic to feminism, gynocentrism or being a tradcuck and barring all other women from interacting with each other or anyone on social media or the internet, participating in tv media, business and politics.
In short, only a few women would be left in free society if men were to really put women back in their place.".

It isn't as simple imo as just taking away women's rights because that would receive a lot of backlash and violent reactions.
 
The bigger question is why would you click on this shit?
 
Foids see 80% of men as trash
 
Why is female comedy all about "muh vuhginuh"?
 
Even the dance moves are all beyonce type ghetto swag "I'm hot you're trash":



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIDiQNu317g&list=RDPH-qRw1DqdU&index=3





View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4PL4T6cskA



Every single bit of female culture is all about how far they are above men

Because these whores are trying to tell themselves that they are better than men because they do not really quite believe it yet so they are repeating it as to make it more believable for themselves.
 
Because these whores are trying to tell themselves that they are better than men because they do not really quite believe it yet so they are repeating it as to make it more believable for themselves.

Precisely, foids are just trying to mentally hype themselves up to believe that they only deserve chad.
 
Yes but they are utter subhumans halo'd hard by fake-up.

Still chadlites give them a chance so even if they are delusional about their looks they still get treated comparable to a stacy these days if they are somewhat attractive and not fat.
 
Still chadlites give them a chance so even if they are delusional about their looks they still get treated comparable to a stacy these days if they are somewhat attractive and not fat.
True, those men need to be stoned ngl.
 
True, those men need to be stoned ngl.
Chadlites and chads simp just as much as unattractive guys if not more but their looks halo prevents a lot of people from recognizing that and they are instead said to have "game"
 
Chadlites and chads simp just as much as unattractive guys if not more but their looks halo prevents a lot of people from recognizing that and they are instead said to have "game"
Chads don't need to simp, women simp for Chads.
 
Chadlites and chads simp just as much as unattractive guys if not more but their looks halo prevents a lot of people from recognizing that and they are instead said to have "game"
200 IQ post
 
Marriage is most beneficial for raising chidren in a stable two parent household imo.
It should become mainstream knowledge that you shouldn't have male children if they are not likely genetics wise to grow up to be tall and objectively good looking in today's world.
Male children that fall short of this standard will live a life suffering that they may only realize too late after they can't help but see how much better good looking males and even better looking normies are treated by them.

Btw @BlkPillPres do you agree that in order for men to put women back in their place

"would mean exiling, imprisoning or executing radical feminists that demonstrate they are determined to hurt low SMV males or have clearly advocated doing so in the past and have not expressed remorse, imprisoning hypocritical "non-feminist" women who protest against the rollback of women's special treatment and the rollback of rights women got at the expense of men, censoring or exiling any people that are sympathetic to feminism, gynocentrism or being a tradcuck and barring all other women from interacting with each other or anyone on social media or the internet, participating in tv media, business and politics.
In short, only a few women would be left in free society if men were to really put women back in their place.".

It isn't as simple imo as just taking away women's rights because that would receive a lot of backlash and violent reactions.

Its not gonna be possible, you'll have to wipe the whole playing field, which is what I hope corona can do after it mutates, a zombie apocalypse would be nice
 
Female 'empowerment' through being whores and acting like it's a good thing
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top