Why does normtard morality treat CSA as worse than child murder?

[Hoodpreet]

Obviously both are wrong, for the retards out there purposely looking to misinterpret my words.

That said, it’s ridiculous how normtards across the political spectrum will cry for blood regarding CSA perpetrators but not have the same energy for child murderers. This is especially true for leftists, who are far more likely to advocate “muh empathy for criminals” in the case of the latter than the former. Vigilante “child protection” content also always targets CSA perps or would-be CSA perps and never CPA perps.

When you consider that most CSA cases are of adolescents as well, not even children, you can see how absolutely brainrotted the morals of the biomass are. Your average normie unironically sees a 20-something (or even an 18 year old) who has a consensual encounter with a curvy 15-year old as more deserving of death than some mentally ill freak who stabs a random 6 year old to death. Actually scratch that, I recall vigilante pedo hunters even trying to jump a 22 year old for trying to get with an 18 year old Absolutely non-cognitive fucking freaks.

I can’t put my finger on why Western normtards think this way, but I have two working theories:

1) Enforcing the arbitrary 18 rule is critical to upholding the gynocracy; aka what normies are enraged about in CSA cases isn’t actually the sanctity of the victim but that of the “rules” set by muh kweenz. Also would partially explain why female CSA perpetrators get literally 0 heat (besides the different power dynamic regarding penetrator vs penetrated).

2) Child killers and CPA perpetrators in the West disproportionately skew ethnic, and the statistics on this are not hard to find. It’s also a well-known fact that ethnics are more tolerant of CPA than whites, hence the common ethnic talking point that gentle parenting is “whypipo shit.” CSA stats also disproportionately incriminate ethnics, but said sets are MUCH harder to come by, and the common stereotype of the CSA perp in Westoid normie imagination is the white pastor/teacher/coach/uncle. So CSA perps may be seen as more “safe” targets for outrage than CPA perps, who are instead “victims of the system” and “targets of public crucifixion.”

That’s all that comes to mind for now. Rant over

 

[ANTAGONIST]

Truthful thread.

This delusion comes from america.

 

[Hoodpreet]

Truthful thread.

This delusion comes from america.

Anglosphere in general I think.

Britain has a “nonce hunting” obsession yet British libtards went to bat for the Southport attacker who stabbed three grade school-aged children to death

 

[hunter x atomics]

Obviously both are wrong, for the retards out there purposely looking to misinterpret my words.

That said, it’s ridiculous how normtards across the political spectrum will cry for blood regarding CSA perpetrators but not have the same energy for child murderers. This is especially true for leftists, who are far more likely to advocate “muh empathy for criminals” in the case of the latter than the former. Vigilante “child protection” content also always targets CSA perps or would-be CSA perps and never CPA perps.

When you consider that most CSA cases are of adolescents as well, not even children, you can see how absolutely brainrotted the morals of the biomass are. Your average normie unironically sees a 20-something (or even an 18 year old) who has a consensual encounter with a curvy 15-year old as more deserving of death than some mentally ill freak who stabs a random 6 year old to death. Actually scratch that, I recall vigilante pedo hunters even trying to jump a 22 year old for trying to get with an 18 year old Absolutely non-cognitive fucking freaks.

I can’t put my finger on why Western normtards think this way, but I have two working theories:

1) Enforcing the arbitrary 18 rule is critical to upholding the gynocracy; aka what normies are enraged about in CSA cases isn’t actually the sanctity of the victim but that of the “rules” set by muh kweenz. Also would partially explain why female CSA perpetrators get literally 0 heat (besides the different power dynamic regarding penetrator vs penetrated).

2) Child killers and CPA perpetrators in the West disproportionately skew ethnic, and the statistics on this are not hard to find. It’s also a well-known fact that ethnics are more tolerant of CPA than whites, hence the common ethnic talking point that gentle parenting is “whypipo shit.” CSA stats also disproportionately incriminate ethnics, but said sets are MUCH harder to come by, and the common stereotype of the CSA perp in Westoid normie imagination is the white pastor/teacher/coach/uncle. So CSA perps may be seen as more “safe” targets for outrage than CPA perps, who are instead “victims of the system” and “targets of public crucifixion.”

That’s all that comes to mind for now. Rant over

My personal theory on it, is that women have significant amount of power when it comes to public opinion especially in leftist circles, so there able to push for the things that affect them to be given more attention. In comparison children(for example that 6 year old you mentioned) aren't cognitive enough to hold political power and if an adult doesn't push for policies to protect them or push for ideas that benefit them they are usually fucked.

 

[Hoodpreet]

My personal theory on it, is that women have significant amount of power when it comes to public opinion especially in leftist circles, so there able to push for the things that affect them to be given more attention. In comparison children(for example that 6 year old you mentioned) aren't cognitive enough to hold political power and if an adult doesn't push for policies to protect them or push for ideas that benefit them they are usually fucked.

I’d say that largely coincides with my first theory. That the anger towards CSA (and particularly adolescent CSA) is driven by an urge to uphold gynocratic norms rather than empathy for the victim. Whereas CPA is not perceived as a threat to gynocracy

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

Obviously both are wrong, for the retards out there purposely looking to misinterpret my words.

That said, it’s ridiculous how normtards across the political spectrum will cry for blood regarding CSA perpetrators but not have the same energy for child murderers. This is especially true for leftists, who are far more likely to advocate “muh empathy for criminals” in the case of the latter than the former. Vigilante “child protection” content also always targets CSA perps or would-be CSA perps and never CPA perps.

When you consider that most CSA cases are of adolescents as well, not even children, you can see how absolutely brainrotted the morals of the biomass are. Your average normie unironically sees a 20-something (or even an 18 year old) who has a consensual encounter with a curvy 15-year old as more deserving of death than some mentally ill freak who stabs a random 6 year old to death. Actually scratch that, I recall vigilante pedo hunters even trying to jump a 22 year old for trying to get with an 18 year old Absolutely non-cognitive fucking freaks.

I can’t put my finger on why Western normtards think this way, but I have two working theories:

1) Enforcing the arbitrary 18 rule is critical to upholding the gynocracy; aka what normies are enraged about in CSA cases isn’t actually the sanctity of the victim but that of the “rules” set by muh kweenz. Also would partially explain why female CSA perpetrators get literally 0 heat (besides the different power dynamic regarding penetrator vs penetrated).

2) Child killers and CPA perpetrators in the West disproportionately skew ethnic, and the statistics on this are not hard to find. It’s also a well-known fact that ethnics are more tolerant of CPA than whites, hence the common ethnic talking point that gentle parenting is “whypipo shit.” CSA stats also disproportionately incriminate ethnics, but said sets are MUCH harder to come by, and the common stereotype of the CSA perp in Westoid normie imagination is the white pastor/teacher/coach/uncle. So CSA perps may be seen as more “safe” targets for outrage than CPA perps, who are instead “victims of the system” and “targets of public crucifixion.”

That’s all that comes to mind for now. Rant over

Yes it's a vague impression that they have where hard crime is some kind of cool people only activity. They are well known to worship criminals so long as they aren't white men, even the mafia is cool because it's just barely not classically white.

 

[Rick prime]

what no pussy does to a nigga

 

[INVERTER]

Consistency was never the point. It's all about virtue signaling for normies

Virtue signal against a retarded soft target man who sleeps with a 17 year old? You're considered virtuous according to soyciety. No blowback whatsoever

Calling out immigrants who stab a child to death? Now you're optically seen in a worse light. It's too risky to go against.

Life is simply a popularity contest with arbitrary rules which are selectively enforced based on your status in the bullshit hierarchy. And like you point out, it is all to placate women and enforced by simps.

 

[Hoodpreet]

Yes it's a vague impression that they have where hard crime is some kind of cool people only activity. They are well known to worship criminals so long as they aren't white men, even the mafia is cool because it's just barely not classically white.

Yeah I can attest to this as someone who went through a failed normiemaxxer and thugmaxxer phase myself. MANY Western normies don’t even see violent crime as a problem unless it happens to a woman or someone they know (and even in these cases they’ll sometimes run apologism for the criminal). They’ll actively cheer it on and worship criminality because that’s the result of a combo of underdeveloped brains + obsession with hip-hop

 

[Hoodpreet]

Consistency was never the point. It's all about virtue signaling for normies

Virtue signal against a retarded soft target man who sleeps with a 17 year old? You're considered virtuous according to soyciety. No blowback whatsoever

Calling out immigrants who stab a child to death? Now you're optically seen in a worse light. It's too risky to go against.

Life is simply a popularity contest with arbitrary rules which are selectively enforced based on your status in the bullshit hierarchy. And like you point out, it is all to placate women and enforced by simps.

Put it perfectly. It was when I realized how amoral normies truly were that made it very easy for me to accept eugenicist and social darwinist thinking. If you want a high-empathy society, you need to genetically select for it first. Dismantling gynocracy is also essential, because a feminized soyciety can never reason morality from a remotely objective perspective

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

One evokes disgust along with rage, the other only the latter. Sexual violence in general seems to be mostly "buffed" in comparison to other types of violence since it's seen as inherently tainting to the victim and as something pure being forever stained, at least as long as the perpetrator is a man, at least. Physical violence, even CPA, doesn't seem to have anywhere near as much "Now that this had happened, you will never be the same," factor to it in society's eyes. That seems to be a factor even with child murder. Remember, it's just a year or so since woman were saying "Yes, we choose death by a bear than risk rape by a man," and recently I've seen a video from a foid youtuber talking about extreme horror books, where she praised the antagonist in one of them for being "unusually respectful" to women by just killing them, instead of doing anything sexual with them.

As far as normies are concerned, the disgust with sexuality makes a serious difference in cases of violence.

 

[SmhChan]

One evokes disgust along with rage, the other only the latter. Sexual violence in general seems to be mostly "buffed" in comparison to other types of violence since it's seen as inherently tainting to the victim and as something pure being forever stained, at least as long as the perpetrator is a man, at least. Physical violence, even CPA, doesn't seem to have anywhere near as much "Now that this had happened, you will never be the same," factor to it in society's eyes. That seems to be a factor even with child murder. Remember, it's just a year or so since woman were saying "Yes, we choose death by a bear than risk rape by a man," and recently I've seen a video from a foid youtuber talking about extreme horror books, where she praised the antagonist in one of them for being "unusually respectful" to women by just killing them, instead of doing anything sexual with them.

As far as normies are concerned, the disgust with sexuality makes a serious difference in cases of violence.

But the thing is foids would rather get gangraped than risk facing a bear. How many fucking foids actually kill themselves even if they're married to a man they don’t find sexually attractive? Normies know that too. It's obviously normies giving too much airtime to foids and letting them set whatever standards they want.

Also, I doubt it has much to do with disgust. Rather jealousy and mindless allegiance to gynocentrism. Normies would cry for ethnic foids for apparently not having enough sexual freedom to be passed around at a nightclub by a bunch of men, but would call for a guy’s head if he has a consensual relationship with a 17-year-old minor.

Even a few years ago, normies used to praise DiCaprio or any old male celeb fucking young whores, but now they find him creepy since roasties have started screeching even harder.

 

[SmhChan]

Put it perfectly. It was when I realized how amoral normies truly were that made it very easy for me to accept eugenicist and social darwinist thinking. If you want a high-empathy society, you need to genetically select for it first. Dismantling gynocracy is also essential, because a feminized soyciety can never reason morality from a remotely objective perspective

With each passing day, I find elites increasingly reasonable. Normies are treated like the subhumans that they are.