Saw This Gem On IT today
What is it with ITCucks consistently strawmanning the Blackpill? Arguing With ITCUcks is so mentally draining ...they act so confident and assured in their viewpoint but yet everything that comes out of their mouths is so idiotic and fallible . What about the philosophy that female sexual desire is very inflexible,[1] that women naturally select men based on looks rather than personality, and that women select men with the best genes. " is so misogynistic especially because its based on reality ...many peer reviewed behavioral studies show that this is the case. This Cuck also mentioons this " Of course, there is no awareness that men have attractiveness standards for women. " Except the blackpilll never said that men had no standards for women simply that the standards for women when compared to the average man is a lot lower. He also brings up an anecdote " Most people know that when people get older, we have a better idea of what we want in a partner. People often start looking more seriously for long term partners, so traits for LTR become more important. We get pickier about personality traits, interest, intelligence, etc, which often means looks are less of a factor. My friends who had trouble getting dates when younger started dating more in their 30s and are almost all married now. " ......Why do normies think that their singular anecdotes that have a very dubious validity mean anything just because you know a guy who unattractive and got married at 30 means literally nothing.
This idiot also plays the whole muh body count doesnt matter " so they teach that doing so is worse than no relationship, that women in their 30s are post-wall, have ridden the cock carousel, as if human beings are products with a freshness seal. As if women don't have our own jobs and incomes. "- IT Cuck
Absolutely it matters. All that follows is one sided, dealing only with the number of partners a woman has had. The reason is, according to researchers, information from men regarding their numbers is unreliable. I find this hysterical given the joke (that’s not a joke) that says; If you want to know the actual number of sexual partners a man has had you take the number he tells you and cut in half. If you want the number for a woman you take the number she tells you and multiply by three. I know that’s an over generalization but in my experience it’s not off by much. Now, to the facts.
Studies have shown that women with 0-1 partners before marriage (either wedding night sex or sex with spouse before marriage) have the lowest divorce rates, around 5%.
Women with exactly 2 partners (one before marriage and her husband) have the 2nd highest divorce rate, 30%. (It's assumed that having "just" 2 partners creates a comparison dynamic that puts the husband and the other man in competition, sexually, in the woman's mind.)
Women with 3, 4-5 & 6-9 partners before marriage have divorce rates of 27%, 25% & 28% respectively. Women with 9+ partners before marriage have the highest divorce rate at 33%+. https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability
women are all absolutely free to do whatever & whoever you wish. However, every choice any of us makes has a consequence, good or bad. Our entire lives are directed by each choice we make each day. If you want to hook up with every Tom, Dick & Harry (T, D & H) that's your choice. If I don't want to have a relationship with or marry you because you've hooked up with every T, D & H that's my choice. No man wants to marry & no child wants their mother to be, or to have been, the town bicycle.
The brain releases oxytocin during sex which can be addictive causing people to seek more partners, before marriage. Imagine you have a partner that really "rocks your world" & the relationship ends. It's highly likely you will want that experience again which will require more intimate partners in order to find a suitable replacement. Think of the turnover at any retailer near you as they try to find employees to fit their business & the problem is obvious. If you only have one partner (your spouse) you'll either never know what you're missing (boo) or you'll communicate (like all couples should) the good & the bad, both will listen & both will attend to the other's needs & desires.
Edit two: Pair bonding. Women pair bond quickly which becomes a problem after many partners. Men pair bond more slowly. Familiarity is required for men which you don’t get when you’re a “player”.
It is said, "Men are born poor & die rich, Women are born rich & die poor." That means men are born with nothing & must work to accumulate worldly wealth. Women are born beautiful, desirable & fertile (we know women aren't born that way, it comes with age, hopefully, but it requires no work, it is inherent to women) but it fades with time. The harsh reality is, the wall is coming & it will be here much sooner than you realize. If you give your youth to the T, D & H of the world what is left for your husband? Women , your virtue (read; virginity, youth, body, reproductive system, reputation etc.) is far more valuable than anything material & once gone, it's gone for good.
And they love moving the goalpost
ITcuck:Looks dont matter at all know a 5,2 balding indian janitor and he has gf
Incel: But thats anecdotal and studies show that looks and money matter almost exclusively
ITcuck:Well .....Well.......Looks may matter but personality matters more
Just about all the advice given to incels is some version of moving the goal posts. An incel is never good enough in his given state, even if he is healthy, able-bodied and employed. Instead the advice-givers always tell him that something else has to happen before he can become worthy of a girlfriend: Graduate from high school; graduate from college; get your first adult job; turn 25; turn 30. Yet when an incel reaches one of these stages and the mysterious girlfriend fails to materialize, the advice-givers tell him that something else has to happen. After a few rounds of the goal post moving, the incel begins to wonder if the people advising him are not acting in good faith, even if they are his friends or parents. This also shows that the advisers don't value the incel's time. Life is fleeting, and the incel needs a girlfriend NOW, TODAY. Sexual relationships are not some science fiction-like project set in the indefinite future, like in the neighborhood of colonizing Mars
What is it with ITCucks consistently strawmanning the Blackpill? Arguing With ITCUcks is so mentally draining ...they act so confident and assured in their viewpoint but yet everything that comes out of their mouths is so idiotic and fallible . What about the philosophy that female sexual desire is very inflexible,[1] that women naturally select men based on looks rather than personality, and that women select men with the best genes. " is so misogynistic especially because its based on reality ...many peer reviewed behavioral studies show that this is the case. This Cuck also mentioons this " Of course, there is no awareness that men have attractiveness standards for women. " Except the blackpilll never said that men had no standards for women simply that the standards for women when compared to the average man is a lot lower. He also brings up an anecdote " Most people know that when people get older, we have a better idea of what we want in a partner. People often start looking more seriously for long term partners, so traits for LTR become more important. We get pickier about personality traits, interest, intelligence, etc, which often means looks are less of a factor. My friends who had trouble getting dates when younger started dating more in their 30s and are almost all married now. " ......Why do normies think that their singular anecdotes that have a very dubious validity mean anything just because you know a guy who unattractive and got married at 30 means literally nothing.
This idiot also plays the whole muh body count doesnt matter " so they teach that doing so is worse than no relationship, that women in their 30s are post-wall, have ridden the cock carousel, as if human beings are products with a freshness seal. As if women don't have our own jobs and incomes. "- IT Cuck
Absolutely it matters. All that follows is one sided, dealing only with the number of partners a woman has had. The reason is, according to researchers, information from men regarding their numbers is unreliable. I find this hysterical given the joke (that’s not a joke) that says; If you want to know the actual number of sexual partners a man has had you take the number he tells you and cut in half. If you want the number for a woman you take the number she tells you and multiply by three. I know that’s an over generalization but in my experience it’s not off by much. Now, to the facts.
Studies have shown that women with 0-1 partners before marriage (either wedding night sex or sex with spouse before marriage) have the lowest divorce rates, around 5%.
Women with exactly 2 partners (one before marriage and her husband) have the 2nd highest divorce rate, 30%. (It's assumed that having "just" 2 partners creates a comparison dynamic that puts the husband and the other man in competition, sexually, in the woman's mind.)
Women with 3, 4-5 & 6-9 partners before marriage have divorce rates of 27%, 25% & 28% respectively. Women with 9+ partners before marriage have the highest divorce rate at 33%+. https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability
women are all absolutely free to do whatever & whoever you wish. However, every choice any of us makes has a consequence, good or bad. Our entire lives are directed by each choice we make each day. If you want to hook up with every Tom, Dick & Harry (T, D & H) that's your choice. If I don't want to have a relationship with or marry you because you've hooked up with every T, D & H that's my choice. No man wants to marry & no child wants their mother to be, or to have been, the town bicycle.
The brain releases oxytocin during sex which can be addictive causing people to seek more partners, before marriage. Imagine you have a partner that really "rocks your world" & the relationship ends. It's highly likely you will want that experience again which will require more intimate partners in order to find a suitable replacement. Think of the turnover at any retailer near you as they try to find employees to fit their business & the problem is obvious. If you only have one partner (your spouse) you'll either never know what you're missing (boo) or you'll communicate (like all couples should) the good & the bad, both will listen & both will attend to the other's needs & desires.
Edit two: Pair bonding. Women pair bond quickly which becomes a problem after many partners. Men pair bond more slowly. Familiarity is required for men which you don’t get when you’re a “player”.
It is said, "Men are born poor & die rich, Women are born rich & die poor." That means men are born with nothing & must work to accumulate worldly wealth. Women are born beautiful, desirable & fertile (we know women aren't born that way, it comes with age, hopefully, but it requires no work, it is inherent to women) but it fades with time. The harsh reality is, the wall is coming & it will be here much sooner than you realize. If you give your youth to the T, D & H of the world what is left for your husband? Women , your virtue (read; virginity, youth, body, reproductive system, reputation etc.) is far more valuable than anything material & once gone, it's gone for good.
And they love moving the goalpost
ITcuck:Looks dont matter at all know a 5,2 balding indian janitor and he has gf
Incel: But thats anecdotal and studies show that looks and money matter almost exclusively
ITcuck:Well .....Well.......Looks may matter but personality matters more
Just about all the advice given to incels is some version of moving the goal posts. An incel is never good enough in his given state, even if he is healthy, able-bodied and employed. Instead the advice-givers always tell him that something else has to happen before he can become worthy of a girlfriend: Graduate from high school; graduate from college; get your first adult job; turn 25; turn 30. Yet when an incel reaches one of these stages and the mysterious girlfriend fails to materialize, the advice-givers tell him that something else has to happen. After a few rounds of the goal post moving, the incel begins to wonder if the people advising him are not acting in good faith, even if they are his friends or parents. This also shows that the advisers don't value the incel's time. Life is fleeting, and the incel needs a girlfriend NOW, TODAY. Sexual relationships are not some science fiction-like project set in the indefinite future, like in the neighborhood of colonizing Mars
appreciate the effort
