She's talking about r/foreveralonedating, not r/foreveralonewomen.
yeah but there's no pictures, what does she mean "they're attractive" there is literally no pictures it's just text
She probably checked out their posts, idk. Never visited that subreddit.
it's a sub about fantasizing about being groped btw, if that wasn't obvious already
They are literally larping as female versions of us.
Using logic with these whores is useless.I can't get how this fucking whore literally found a way to victimize foids with this. "they're normal looking and should get dates irl, they're probably using foids!"
many ways can explain why she's a whore and whoring around the main point:
-supposedly if they were normal looking and foreveralone subreddits are only for bad looking people male/female as she implies, and that they should easily get dates irl, then why would they opt for ugly whore nudes and use them anyways? they should be able to do that irl too since they get dates with normal looking people as implied, why would they opt to subhuman reddits and waste so much time to do so? makes a lot of sense, only to whores and cuckdittors
-if they are so normal looking, what's stopping you from dating them? why too many people still single and searching for a partner in such subs if that is true?
-"not saying they are supermodels" this is like the icing on the cake, her subconscious can't remove chad from her own mind for mere moments, even though she is trying to hide it and literally posting on "femcel" subreddit ,she mentioned them first even though she is coping hard about hypergamy and whoring around it like a prancing twitchy quivering slut after getting impaled, she still can't get over not mentioning chad, her true here. JFL
|
Wtf are you even posting?Off-Topic Logic Game
Unintelligent_Anon
Join Date: 2016-02-24
Post Count: 361#185501144Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:07 PM CDT
Greetings, Off-Topic. On this particular occasion, I have decided to have an entertaining discussion with all of you by composing a simple game based on logical-reasoning. Firstly, while utilizing mathematics, we have objective statements such as "x = 5" Those particular type of statements are properly known as "predicates", given that they equate to either the Boolean values of true and/or false. within the above premise, it merely defines the quantity that variable 'x' represents. Therefore, it is "true" predicate. Although I used "x = 5", we could use symbolic notation such as this: E(x) = 5 Where uppercase "E" refers to the word "Equal", and the input variable 'x' receives the quantity described on the opposite side of the "=" operand. --------------------------------------- Recognizing the above objective explanation, the goal of the game is rather basic: to derive logical expressions to be interpreted by other users. I have devised a minimal list of logical symbols below: "-->" - The logical "if-then" operator. "If certain cookies are delicious, then some grapes are bluish"(Note that the premise predicate and the conclusion predicate do not necessarily need to be related. They merely need to have an obtainable Boolean value. '~' - The logical "NOT" operator. It merely negates "true"/"false" Boolean predicates into the opposite Boolean value. ~"I decided to traverse the area" becomes "I decided not to traverse the area." "^" - The logical AND operator. "(1+1 = 2) ^ (2 + 2 = 4) --> (5 + 5) == 10", which is true, given that "1 + 1 = 2 ^ 2 + 2 = 4" are both (true ^ true) respectively. Disregarding all of the other logical operators for the current moment, this is a sample expression that I have devised below: Suppose that we have variables 'a' and 'b': a = 100 b = 50 Firstly, let us define a predicate to determine whether the first value is a factor of the second value: R(a,b) = (a % b) This will retrieve the remainder of the division operation "a/b", using the difference between 'a' and 'b' as a referent. Likewise, R(b,a) would also retrieve the remainder of the division operation "b/a", using the difference between 'b' and 'a' as a referent. If I had an expression such as this: (R(a,b) = 0) ^ (R(b,a) = 0) It would be an expected case of a true/false pair. This is due to the mere fact that the (100 % 50) does not have a remainder, whereas (50/100) does indeed have a remainder of fifty itself. Hopefully the above descriptions provides a rather wholesome and otherwise precise discussion involving mathematical logic.
so worth a shot
The worse they can say is no.
dmed one, let's see
Let me know how it goes
so far one didn't answer and the other just replied "huh?"
Send them a video of your bulging biceps bro wamman love masculine guyz
I have stretch marks everywhere, that I've put on muscle. I look like a tren teen despite being clean my entire life. my entire left arm has red/purple slashes all over. my entire biceps is covered in stretchmarks and my forearm covered in cuts. from excessive ass and balls scratching I've also found out the majority of my crotch area is also covered in stretch marks. but the biggest issue I'm an autist and take pictures like it. ever pic I take I have the aspie stare (real thing look it up) and is greasy and just awful quality in general.
Brutal
Brain crash
I'm trying to find out more about the people that dmed them, but idk how to ask"only 5-6"
"barely 15 people"
I hope one day I can become smart enough to decipher his hidden messages.
Just ask them what those people were like
Amen
