E
@user @DarkStar @Negroid Berber
no shit meds had contact with other meds
who would have known?
who would have known?
Inb4 50 users commenting Jewish propaganda
carthage alexandria berytus and antioch are a jewish psyop theory
E
N
Did you mean anatolian farmer?
>"Rome was like New York City … a concentration of people of different origins joining together,"
And everyone with half a brain hated it.
Big ups to my boy Diocletian, who fucking hated the city of Rome.
And everyone with half a brain hated it.
Big ups to my boy Diocletian, who fucking hated the city of Rome.
Means nothing to me. I'm a saxon-nordic mix
D
The middle east used to be full of blue eyes blonde hair Aryans from Atlantis
E
E
did he
They were probably slaves or traveling merchants from the Levant. Those samples do not represent the average citizen of Imperial Rome
E
The genetic "diversity was just overwhelming," Pinhasi says.
N
It was made up cope
South Italia was populated mosly by greek (mycacenean)
South Italia was populated mosly by greek (mycacenean)
Last edited:
Well yes, but the thing is this population was primarily confined to Rome-proper(aka the City) which went through wars, disease, famine, etc.
This population was unable to sustain itself which caused for it to eventually die out:
survivethejive.blogspot.com
View: https://x.com/whatifalthist/status/1773112010303021455
South Italy was also colonized by the Greeks of Classical Antiquity(Mycenaeans), who later became "italicized" Linguistically
This population was unable to sustain itself which caused for it to eventually die out:
Ancient Roman DNA
survivethejive.blogspot.com
View: https://x.com/whatifalthist/status/1773112010303021455
See above, basically it was only to Rome itself, but this population had a high mortality & low reproduction rate which combined with other things caused it to collapse & then late the city became more European again.
South Italy was also colonized by the Greeks of Classical Antiquity(Mycenaeans), who later became "italicized" Linguistically
Last edited:
He did.
He famously only visited Rome 20 full years after being crowned Emperor, avoiding it on purpose. He also hated it so much he cut his visit short, and decided to leave earlier.
E
But once the empire split in two and the eastern capital moved to Constantinople (what is now Istanbul, Turkey) in the fourth century C.E., Rome's diversity decreased. Trade routes sent people and goods to the new capital, and epidemics and invasions reduced Rome's population to about 100,000 people. Invading barbarians brought in more European ancestry. Rome gradually lost its strong genetic link to the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. By medieval times, city residents again genetically resembled European populations.
Basically what I said here:
Well yes, but the thing is this population was primarily confined to Rome-proper(aka the City) which went through wars, disease, famine, etc.
This population was unable to sustain itself which caused for it to eventually die out:
View attachment 1378349
Ancient Roman DNA
View: https://x.com/whatifalthist/status/1773112010303021455
See above, basically it was only to Rome itself, but this population had a high mortality & low reproduction rate which combined with other things caused it to collapse & then late the city became more European again.
South Italy was also colonized by the Greeks of Antiquity more or less, who later became "italicized" Linguistically
Though it was more confined to Rome-proper and not so much all of Italy, since Rome was basically:
U
Yep. The genetic diversity observed in ancient Rome is a clear example of the consequences of racial mixing. The Roman Empire was undeniably powerful at its height, it is no coincidence that it began to decline as its population grew more diverse, especially with an influx of ME/NA people.
Yes, that's a bit of an oversimplification though.
E
Well yes, but the thing is this population was primarily confined to Rome-proper(aka the City) which went through wars, disease, famine, etc.
This population was unable to sustain itself which caused for it to eventually die out:
View attachment 1378349
Ancient Roman DNA
View: https://x.com/whatifalthist/status/1773112010303021455
See above, basically it was only to Rome itself, but this population had a high mortality & low reproduction rate which combined with other things caused it to collapse & then late the city became more European again.
South Italy was also colonized by the Greeks of Antiquity more or less, who later became "italicized" Linguistically
areas to the east of Italy were more populous than Europe; many people lived in big cities such as Athens and Alexandria. And Rome was connected to Greece and the Middle East by the Mediterranean Sea, which was far easier to traverse than overland routes through the Alps, he says.
What's the point? It says citizens of Rome, a world city, during Imperial times. That's like making some point about the denizens of New York City in 2025 and comparing it to its earlier colonial history, when it was over 90% White as late as like 1960.
E
At the height of Rome's power, city residents showed little European DNA
E
. The genetic "diversity was just overwhelming," Pinhasi says.
N
Good news is, the population was confined to Rome & at least a few other large cities which were basically the "New Yorks" of the time, and as the paper shows, it later became repopulated by Europeans.
Yeah ofc, hence why the Empire declined
But then after that population died out, migrated, failed to reproduce for any number of reasons, etc. it was repopulated.
E
btw do modern modern turks have european dna i saw a turk say they have anatolian ancestry
E
it was funny
E
paper says by barbarians
E
Invading barbarians brought in more European ancestry
that and other settlers from parts of Italy & Europe, traders, etc.
Well yes, but the thing is this population was primarily confined to Rome-proper(aka the City) which went through wars, disease, famine, etc.
This population was unable to sustain itself which caused for it to eventually die out:
View attachment 1378349
Ancient Roman DNA
View: https://x.com/whatifalthist/status/1773112010303021455
See above, basically it was only to Rome itself, but this population had a high mortality & low reproduction rate which combined with other things caused it to collapse & then late the city became more European again.
South Italy was also colonized by the Greeks of Classical Antiquity(Mycenaeans), who later became "italicized" Linguistically
Basically the city shifted from its founding population, to Near-Eastern, then European again.
U
Rome's strength also came from its cultural unity and military prowess, not just its genetic makeup. While diversity existed, it likely fucked with Rome's social unity, which did contribute to Rome's decline.
The collapse was due to various factors, though mainly genetics
N
I mean if really mena like people
Then why do the paper not mentioning any Y haplogroup at all?
E
ok so more immigration leads to world superpower but then declines as it becomes too diverse- similar to us?
E
yeah globalization has its perks
U
It’s not about the presence of immigration or diversity per se, rather how it impacts the stability of a society. A nation can rise through immigration if it successfully assimilates and integrates those populations into a unified culture and identity. However, when diversity becomes too great, it can lead to a loss of social connection, shared values, collective identity, etc., which makes it harder to keep the same level of stability.
The decline of empires like Rome wasn't caused by immigration alone but by a breakdown in the unity that originally made them powerful. The same can and is happening to modern nations if they fail to maintain that unity
sounds like america
E
what happened after the repopulation
Don't believe any study in the last few decades onwards.
Jews will stretch and bend any 'evidence' they find to push the Europe was always diverse agenda.
Jews will stretch and bend any 'evidence' they find to push the Europe was always diverse agenda.
E
yeah immigration opens up new routes, trades, i don't believe in assimilation in our technological world we can experience all the benefits without importation
Last edited:
E
also early immigration had an effect on the rise of us but then leftists took over the decline of Britain started with the legislation of lgbt
E
immigration from where also depends, best case scenario is an ethnocentric nation
Become the richest in the known world, and you attract all of the parasitic trash looking for free bread and circus.
E
i believe ben shapiro said something similar, " the us can be fully brown if its american in thinking" @DarkStar im paraphrasing but it was similar to this
Similar threads
autisticandugly
Users who are viewing this thread
