This hypothetical was for an equal face though.
I disagree. Marfan syndrome is more deform tier, usually disproportionate, and Vshape intact. There are maybe marfan affected individuals that could fall within what I mean, but there are also ones who are just small without such a label. Many of these syndromes are just grouped phenomena which can also occur outside of these typical scenarios. Does not really mean much in my mind. What I can see is what I can see, and there are many nordics and africans who have ridiculously narrow shoulders. Just like the picture i made, and I did not even see many of them shirtless, so I might even be underestimating it.
The thing I feel is of prime importance in my thinking is simply how much of a T indicator frame and neck actually is. The poster below here misses the point, and I admit I could have made my PS attempt more slim.
Muscles is not intended to be the point, even though wide framed men seem to have an easier time to pack it on generally. Wide clavicle width was referenced for a reason.
Once again muscles are ultracope, it's all about how much lateral growth there are in your bones. Face width aswell as frame is very important, ahead of some usually cited top 3 factors.
JFL, he has a godly frame for a rice, and the only before pics in the video is as angle frauded as can be.