Thinking of doing a round of longer term tinder experiments. One week in each city with a 6/10 guy and carefully document the results.
What's worse? San Francisco, Toronto or London when it comes to hypergamy / shitty dating market?
NYC.
NYC is by far the easiest.. I've tried Austin, Miami, Boston, Los Angelos.
None were even close to as easy for getting matches in NYC using any guys pics, average or hot.
not sure why people would say that it's bad there.
London is Incel capital of the world. All roasties here want a 6ft2 white gigachad. I cannot think of any city to rival this. Outside of London, it is a bit better, but its not called the United Cuckdom for nothing.
Toronto, London, then SF. SF is hypergamous in the financial sense (high cost of living). Lots of soyboys in SF, so a Chad will easily have his pick of the litter
LA
London
London.
Try Melbourne, holy shit is it impossible if you’re even slightly different.
What do all those three cities mentioned have in common? If you guessed that their shitty liberal hell holes, you'd be correct!
They are all easier than any city in Scandinavia.
Similar threads
SuicideFuel
ChatGPT writes a story about the sex life of a typical 5/10 post-college white female (body count included)
- kangarooc3l
- Inceldom Discussion
currymuncher007
Discussion
Does Personality Matter to Women in Online Dating? An Analysis of Tinder Swipe Activity by Gender
- ResidentHell
- Inceldom Discussion
suicidecase
Users who are viewing this thread
