Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment What is the most genocidal race?

who

  • Africans

    Votes: 13 20.6%
  • Whites (Europeans)

    Votes: 20 31.7%
  • Middle Easterners (Iranians, Jews, Arabs, Turks etc)

    Votes: 22 34.9%
  • East Asians

    Votes: 5 7.9%
  • Southeast Asians (including Maori)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Indians (including Pakistanis)

    Votes: 1 1.6%
  • Latins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Native Americans (before intermixing by colonizers)

    Votes: 2 3.2%

  • Total voters
    63
Whites, seriously how is this even a conversation
The number is even higher if you count indirect forms like colonial powers inciting tensions in their territories, case in point Rwanda
We were also very generous during colonialism, giving them cities and technology in return for the resources
lol
Before Europeans came to subsaharan Africa, they had no written language, hadn't invented the wheel, and were stuck in the stone age.
They hadn't even reached the bronze age with all their resources, while Europeans were creatung giant castles, cathedrals, cannons, and guns
lol
 
Whites, seriously how is this even a conversation
The number is even higher if you count indirect forms like colonial powers inciting tensions in their territories, case in point Rwanda

lol

lol
"Lol" all you like what I said was literally true. Stuck in stone age, no written language, no wheel.
 
You fucking anti white Marxist are either resentful of our success or your a self hating cuck, you people are still slaughtering eachother and us whites to this day. Look at crime rates of first world vs third world, and internally of whites vs nonwhites and immigrants.
 
You fucking anti white Marxist are either resentful of our success or your a self hating cuck, you people are still slaughtering eachother and us whites to this day. Look at crime rates of first world vs third world, and internally of whites vs nonwhites and immigrants.
Nobody is saying all nonwhites are completely peaceful and never did anything wrong, but you are delusional if you believe Europeans aren't directly and indirectly responsible for the vast majority of genocides that have occurred, which is the point of this thread
 
Don't be annoying. The horn of Africa had contact with Christians and Muslims and got technology from them so they don't count as African tech or advancement and are also genetically distinct from sub Saharan
Screenshot 2025 10 23 19 20 54 28 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb

Screenshot 2025 10 23 19 20 15 96 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
 
Nobody is saying all nonwhites are completely peaceful and never did anything wrong, but you are delusional if you believe Europeans aren't directly and indirectly responsible for the vast majority of genocides that have occurred, which is the point of this thread
How did Europeans cause red indians, Africans, Chinese exc to all genocide each other before we even made contact with them?
 
and are also genetically distinct from sub Saharan
Sub-Saharans = south of the Saharan
The horn of africa is south of the sahara
Don't really know why you're getting so pressed about this
 
Holocaust
didnt happen. stopped reading. next thing youll do is show me a picture of holodomor victims and say they are gassed jews. u probably dont realize holodomor is done by jews either
 
Sub-Saharans = south of the Saharan
The horn of africa is south of the sahara
Don't really know why you're getting so pressed about this
Oh yeah, and the English colonialist technology was obviously created by red indians because they also lived in America.
 
Sub-Saharans = south of the Saharan
The horn of africa is south of the sahara
Don't really know why you're getting so pressed about this
As he mentioned, centuries of contact with Christian and Muslim civilizations prior to the 19th century set the Horn of Africa apart from the rest of sub-saharan Africa. Apart from a few trading posts established by Europeans and Arabs, sub-saharan Africa was isolated.
 
As he mentioned, centuries of contact with Christian and Muslim civilizations prior to the 19th century set the Horn of Africa apart from the rest of sub-saharan Africa. Apart from a few trading posts established by Europeans and Arabs, sub-saharan Africa was isolated.
Anti whites wont admit that, we wuz kaaaangs without those damn whyts ruining our wakanda
 
Last edited:
Read through this thread

View: https://x.com/poperespecter1/status/1944051454743871502?t=3U0FHsLdsVWnMW3v-DmE6g&s=19


Also I straight up mentioned the "native Americans" (red indians). But note that

A. They genocided eachother all the time before we came, the only difference between us and them was our superior intelligence/technology

B. We were there BEFORE them. Whites were the real natives and they stole the land from us.
View attachment 1580218
View attachment 1580220

I think Native Americans were a blend of White and Asian blood.

The ANE were then further mixed with East Asian genes.

1761265909925
 
I think Native Americans were a blend of White and Asian blood.

View attachment 1580317
yes, they did some mixing with the whites who originally inhabited America, I remember watching a video that mentioned they traced back a European ancestor in Siberia who was frozen in the ice
 
I don't know why you guys keep mentioning them specifically
Because the horn is literally the only example of successful Africans. Sub Saharan Africa had nothing, as I showed before. No bronze age, no written language, no wheels, no guns, just cannibalism and genocide. All while Europeans created the world and technology we know today
 
Anti whites with admit that, we wuz kaaaangs without those damn whyts ruining our wakanda
Tbh niggers were best off when left alone. Attempting to civilize them was not only a waste of time, but also opened a whole can of worms that continues to fuck us to this day. If niggers had remained wild savages, isolated from the rest of the world, not only would there be fewer of them and they would have no way of bothering the rest of the world, but they would probably also be happier.
There were already flourishing civilizations in the horn before Christianity and Islam were even a thing, I don't know why you guys keep mentioning them specifically
They had contact with mediterranean and middle eastern civilizations before that. Besides, they are not the same race as bantus, although they are similar
And are responsible for the vast majority of genocides in history
Genocide is post WW2 term coined to describe the state-sponsored extermination of entire ethnic groups. Most "genocides" in history are nothing more than protracted wars between ethnic groups/nations until one ethnicity finally triumphs over the other. This practice is neither unique nor specific to Europeans. Planned state genocides are very, very rare.
 
  • Mao Zedong – China
    40–80 million
    Great Leap Forward famine, Cultural Revolution, purges
  • Joseph Stalin – Soviet Union
    20–60 million
    Holodomor, Great Purge, Gulags, deportations
  • Genghis Khan – Mongol Empire
    ~40 million
    Massacres during conquests (China, Persia, Europe)
  • Hong Xiuquan – Taiping Rebellion
    20–30 million
    Civil war, religious mass killings in China
  • Timur (Tamerlane) – Timurid Empire
    ~17 million
    Skulls pyramids, city annihilations (Delhi, Baghdad)
  • Pol Pot – Cambodia (Khmer Rouge)
    1.5–3 million
    Killing fields, forced labor, ethnic cleansing
  • Yahya Khan – Pakistan (1971)
    ~3 million
    Bangladesh genocide (Operation Searchlight)
  • Ismail Enver Pasha – Ottoman Empire
    ~2 million
    Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek genocides (1915–1923)
  • Suharto – Indonesia
    ~1–2 million
    1965–66 anti-communist massacres, East Timor invasion
  • Hideki Tojo – Japan (WWII)
    ~3–10 million (civilian deaths in occupied Asia)
    Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, forced labor, starvation policies
  • Mengistu Haile Mariam – Ethiopia
    ~1–2 million
    Red Terror, forced resettlement, famine weaponization
  • Saddam Hussein – Iraq
    ~500,000–1 million
    Anfal genocide (Kurds), Iran-Iraq War civilians, 1991 uprisings
  • Jean Kambanda / Théoneste Bagosora – Rwanda (1994)
    ~800,000
    Tutsi genocide in 100 days
 
caucasoids (whites, kikes, arabs)
 
Rwandan Genocide (Hutu against Tutsi, 1994)

Burundian Genocide (Tutsi against Hutu, 1972)

Burundian Genocide (Hutu against Tutsi, 1993)

Darfur Genocide (Arab militias against non-Arab Africans, 2003–present)

Isaaq Genocide (Somali government against Isaaq clan, 1987–1989)

Anfal Campaign

1994 Burundi Massacres (Hutu against Tutsi)

1972 Ikiza (Tutsi army against Hutu intellectuals)

South Sudan Ethnic Cleansing (Dinka against Nuer, 2013–present)

Central African Republic Conflict (Anti-Balaka against Seleka Muslims, 2013–present)

Ituri Conflict Massacres (Hema against Lendu, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1999–2003)

Kivu Conflicts (Mai-Mai against Rwandan Hutu refugees, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996–1997)

Mfecane Wars (Zulu against neighboring Nguni groups, 1815–1840)

Ethiopian Red Terror (Derg against political opponents including ethnic groups, 1977–1978)

Tigray War Atrocities (Ethiopian government against Tigrayans, 2020–2022)

RSF Massacres in West Darfur (Rapid Support Forces against Masalit, 2023–present)

Hutu Power Massacres in Gisenyi (Hutu against Tutsi, 1990–1994)

Interahamwe Killings in Refugee Camps (RPF against Hutu refugees, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996)
Yeah sure nigger if i go on chatGPT and ask them to give a list of atrocities and genocides it will deliver.

Ethnics mostly fought amongst their own groups, whities went around the entire world and terrorised everyone.

In b4 we built schools n shiettttt

That only the top elite can attend JFL
 
The only reason why people are picking East Asians is because of the sheer amount of mass killings they've participated in
 
Ethnics mostly fought amongst their own groups, whities went around the entire world and terrorised everyone.
Uhhh because we had better technology. We didn't do anything morally worse than the other races. We killed fewer people than nonwhites
 
This doesn't even mention deaths from capitalism BTW
It literally says things like "global poverty" "disease" "hunger" WTF else do you want it to include?
 
It literally says things like "global poverty" "disease" "hunger" WTF else do you want it to include?
This is nonsensical btw because the third world would be even poorer and more backward if we had never interacted with them at all, it's not like their murder, rape, and starvation rates would be any lower if we had never given them foreign aid :feelsEhh: stupid niggers
 
 
Whites created capitalism which has inadvertently killed millioms and worsened lives of many
Capitalism would have always come into play eventually

Humans are too greedy for it not to have
 


1. 500 Years of Slavery
Claim: Implies U.S. responsible for 500 years of slavery.
Inaccuracy:
The U.S. existed for ~250 years (1776–2025). Slavery in the Americas began in the early 1500s under Spanish and Portuguese rule.
The transatlantic slave trade lasted ~400 years (15th–19th century), involving multiple European powers.
U.S. slavery: 1619–1865 (246 years). **388,000 Africans** were brought directly to North America (per Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database).
Corrected Context: The U.S. was involved in slavery for less than 250 years, and was a minor player in the overall slave trade compared to Brazil (4.8M), etc.
2. Genocide of Native Americans
Claim: Implies U.S. orchestrated total genocide.
Inaccuracy:
Pre-Columbian population estimates: 2–18 million in North America (scholarly range).
90%+ died from disease (smallpox, measles) before sustained contact with Europeans — not all deliberate genocide.
U.S. policies (Trail of Tears, reservations, wars): ~100,000–300,000 direct deaths (high-end estimates).
Corrected Context: While U.S. policies were brutal and genocidal in specific cases (e.g., California Gold Rush massacres), the vast majority of decline was due to disease, not direct killing.
3. Children Killed by Preventable Disease / Hunger / Global Poverty
Claim: U.S. is responsible for global child deaths.
Inaccuracy:
These are global issues, not U.S.-caused.
UNICEF: ~5.4M children under 5 die annually (2020), mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia — due to poverty, poor healthcare, conflict.
U.S. is the largest donor of foreign aid ($50B+/year) and funds PEPFAR, USAID, GAVI, which save millions of lives.
Corrected Context: The U.S. reduces these deaths through aid, not causes them.
4. Vietnam War / Korean War / Angolan Civil War / etc.
Claim: U.S. is responsible for all deaths in these conflicts.
Inaccuracy:
Vietnam War: 1–3M total deaths (mostly Vietnamese). U.S. responsible for **58,000 American + 250,000–500,000 South Vietnamese & Viet Cong**. North Vietnam & Viet Cong caused **1M+ civilian deaths**.
Korean War: ~2–3M total. U.S./UN: ~40,000 dead. North Korea/China: majority of civilian deaths.
Angolan Civil War (1975–2002): ~500,000 dead. U.S. backed UNITA; Soviet Union/Cuba backed MPLA. Both superpowers fueled the war, but local actors drove most violence.
Indonesian Civil War (1965–66): ~500,000–1M killed in anti-communist massacres. U.S. provided lists and support, but Indonesian military carried out killings.
Corrected Context: U.S. shares responsibility in many proxy wars, but not sole or primary cause. Local regimes and other powers (USSR, China) were equally or more culpable.
5. Interventions in Guatemala, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, El Salvador, Argentina
Claim: U.S. orchestrated all violence.
Inaccuracy:
Guatemala (1954): CIA coup → civil war (1960–1996): ~200,000 dead. U.S. backed regime, but Guatemalan military did most killing.
Nicaragua (1980s): U.S. funded Contras → ~30,000 dead. Sandinistas also committed atrocities.
Sri Lanka: U.S. had no significant role in civil war (1983–2009, ~100,000 dead). India, Norway, and local actors dominated.
El Salvador: U.S. backed government → ~75,000 dead. Death squads and FMLN both responsible.
Argentina (1976–83): U.S. trained military, but Argentine junta ran “Dirty War” (~30,000 disappeared).
Corrected Context: U.S. enabled or supported repressive regimes, but local actors executed the violence.
6. Cuban Embargo / Libyan War / War on Drugs / etc.
Cuban Embargo: Caused economic hardship, but not mass death. Cuba’s healthcare system is state-run and functional.
Libyan War (2011): NATO (incl. U.S.) intervened → ~20,000–30,000 dead. Not U.S. unilateral action.
War on Drugs: U.S. policy fueled violence in Mexico (~400,000 dead since 2006), but cartels and corruption are primary drivers.
Sanctions on Iraq (1990s): UNICEF estimated ~500,000 child deaths due to sanctions + Saddam’s diversion of aid. Highly disputed — Saddam used oil-for-food funds for palaces.
 
Capitalism would have always come into play eventually

Humans are too greedy for it not to have
Third world was too primitive and retarded to achieve what we know as capitalism. If we never made contact with subsaharan Africa or the red indians, they would still be in the stone age no doubt. They were stuck like that for their entire existence, it wouldn't magically change in the past couple hundred years
 
1. 500 Years of Slavery
Claim: Implies U.S. responsible for 500 years of slavery.
Inaccuracy:
The U.S. existed for ~250 years (1776–2025). Slavery in the Americas began in the early 1500s under Spanish and Portuguese rule.
The transatlantic slave trade lasted ~400 years (15th–19th century), involving multiple European powers.
U.S. slavery: 1619–1865 (246 years). **388,000 Africans** were brought directly to North America (per Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database).
Corrected Context: The U.S. was involved in slavery for less than 250 years, and was a minor player in the overall slave trade compared to Brazil (4.8M), etc.
2. Genocide of Native Americans
Claim: Implies U.S. orchestrated total genocide.
Inaccuracy:
Pre-Columbian population estimates: 2–18 million in North America (scholarly range).
90%+ died from disease (smallpox, measles) before sustained contact with Europeans — not all deliberate genocide.
U.S. policies (Trail of Tears, reservations, wars): ~100,000–300,000 direct deaths (high-end estimates).
Corrected Context: While U.S. policies were brutal and genocidal in specific cases (e.g., California Gold Rush massacres), the vast majority of decline was due to disease, not direct killing.
3. Children Killed by Preventable Disease / Hunger / Global Poverty
Claim: U.S. is responsible for global child deaths.
Inaccuracy:
These are global issues, not U.S.-caused.
UNICEF: ~5.4M children under 5 die annually (2020), mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia — due to poverty, poor healthcare, conflict.
U.S. is the largest donor of foreign aid ($50B+/year) and funds PEPFAR, USAID, GAVI, which save millions of lives.
Corrected Context: The U.S. reduces these deaths through aid, not causes them.
4. Vietnam War / Korean War / Angolan Civil War / etc.
Claim: U.S. is responsible for all deaths in these conflicts.
Inaccuracy:
Vietnam War: 1–3M total deaths (mostly Vietnamese). U.S. responsible for **58,000 American + 250,000–500,000 South Vietnamese & Viet Cong**. North Vietnam & Viet Cong caused **1M+ civilian deaths**.
Korean War: ~2–3M total. U.S./UN: ~40,000 dead. North Korea/China: majority of civilian deaths.
Angolan Civil War (1975–2002): ~500,000 dead. U.S. backed UNITA; Soviet Union/Cuba backed MPLA. Both superpowers fueled the war, but local actors drove most violence.
Indonesian Civil War (1965–66): ~500,000–1M killed in anti-communist massacres. U.S. provided lists and support, but Indonesian military carried out killings.
Corrected Context: U.S. shares responsibility in many proxy wars, but not sole or primary cause. Local regimes and other powers (USSR, China) were equally or more culpable.
5. Interventions in Guatemala, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, El Salvador, Argentina
Claim: U.S. orchestrated all violence.
Inaccuracy:
Guatemala (1954): CIA coup → civil war (1960–1996): ~200,000 dead. U.S. backed regime, but Guatemalan military did most killing.
Nicaragua (1980s): U.S. funded Contras → ~30,000 dead. Sandinistas also committed atrocities.
Sri Lanka: U.S. had no significant role in civil war (1983–2009, ~100,000 dead). India, Norway, and local actors dominated.
El Salvador: U.S. backed government → ~75,000 dead. Death squads and FMLN both responsible.
Argentina (1976–83): U.S. trained military, but Argentine junta ran “Dirty War” (~30,000 disappeared).
Corrected Context: U.S. enabled or supported repressive regimes, but local actors executed the violence.
6. Cuban Embargo / Libyan War / War on Drugs / etc.
Cuban Embargo: Caused economic hardship, but not mass death. Cuba’s healthcare system is state-run and functional.
Libyan War (2011): NATO (incl. U.S.) intervened → ~20,000–30,000 dead. Not U.S. unilateral action.
War on Drugs: U.S. policy fueled violence in Mexico (~400,000 dead since 2006), but cartels and corruption are primary drivers.
Sanctions on Iraq (1990s): UNICEF estimated ~500,000 child deaths due to sanctions + Saddam’s diversion of aid. Highly disputed — Saddam used oil-for-food funds for palaces.
Screenshot 2025 07 02 22 18 25 04 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb

Well well well
 
It literally says things like "global poverty" "disease" "hunger" WTF else do you want it to include?
So you admit capitalism caused this JFL

Give me the source for all of these btw, also the Muslim slave trade of whites once again lasted longer and included more people than the transatlantic slave trade
Source: any school textbook, internet archives, Wikipedia.

This is nonsensical btw because the third world would be even poorer and more backward if we had never interacted with them at all, it's not like their murder, rape, and starvation rates would be any lower if we had never given them foreign aid :feelsEhh: stupid niggers
It would've been better, they would've became highly developed countries without europeans extracting resources and exploiting the local populace. Poverty, rape, whatever, is all exacerbated due to harsh colonial rule.

Third world was too primitive and retarded to achieve what we know as capitalism. If we never made contact with subsaharan Africa or the red indians, they would still be in the stone age no doubt. They were stuck like that for their entire existence, it wouldn't magically change in the past couple hundred years
The west has caused ungodly amounts of plight and suffering to the countries of the third world. These people used to flourish in their peaceful communties before whites drew arbitrary borders and ruined it all
 
It would've been better, they would've became highly developed countries without europeans extracting resources and exploiting the local populace. Poverty, rape, whatever, is all exacerbated due to harsh colonial rule.
They were poorer than you could imagine before we ever found them
Screenshot 2025 05 15 16 27 54 99 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
 
Do you admit capitalism caused this JFL


Source: any school textbook, internet archives, Wikipedia.


It would've been better, they would've became highly developed countries without europeans extracting resources and exploiting the local populace. Poverty, rape, whatever, is all exacerbated due to harsh colonial rule.


The west has caused ungodly amounts of plight and suffering to the countries of the third world. These people used to flourish in their peaceful communties before whites drew arbitrary borders and ruined it all

They were poorer than you could imagine before we ever found them
View attachment 1580794
Lies
 
Once again I will list genocides committed by Africans before colonialism happened to them

Mfecane/Difaqane Wars (Zulu expansions against Nguni, Sotho, and other groups, early 19th century)
Shaka Zulu's Massacres of Swazi and Ndwandwe Peoples (1810s-1820s)
Dingane Zulu's Executions of Hlubi and Nyawo Clans (1830s)
Senzangakhona's Purges in Zulu Kingdom (late 18th century)
Mpande Zulu's Campaign Against Dingane's Faction (1838-1840)
Mzilikazi Ndebele's Raids on Sotho and Tswana Communities (1820s-1830s)
Great Trek-Era Conflicts Between Matabele and Griqua Peoples (1830s)
Ethiopian Emperor Susenyos's Forced Conversion Massacres of Agaw and Sidama (1620s-1630s)
Lebna Dengel Ethiopian Wars Against Agau and Somali Clans (early 16th century)
Songhai Empire's Conquests and Mass Killings of Mossi and Dogon (late 15th-early 16th century)
Askia Muhammad's Purges of Soninke and Mandinka in Songhai (1490s-1520s)
Mali Empire's Sack of Timbuktu and Tuareg Massacres (1430s)
Bornu Empire's Wars Against Kotoko and Sao Peoples (14th-15th centuries)
Kanem-Bornu Conquests and Extermination of Tebu Nomads (12th-13th centuries)
Great Zimbabwe Conflicts with Tonga and Shona Subgroups (13th-14th centuries)
Mapungubwe Kingdom Raids on Khoisan Foragers (11th-12th centuries)
Aksumite Kingdom's Suppression of Beja and Agaw Rebellions (4th-6th centuries)
Nubian Kingdom Massacres of Noba Tribes (4th century)
Bantu Migrations and Genocide of Khoisan Hunter-Gatherers (1st-5th centuries AD)
Kingdom of Kongo Wars Against Teke and Luba Peoples (14th century)
Luba Empire's Expansion Killings of Lunda Clans (16th century)
Lunda Empire Conquests Against Chokwe and Kaonde (17th century)
Buganda Kingdom Purges of Banyoro and Basoga (18th century)
Bunyoro-Iteso Wars and Mass Killings (late 18th-early 19th century)
Dahomey Kingdom's Annual Slave Raids and Sacrifices of Yoruba Captives (17th-19th centuries)
Oyo Empire's Campaigns Against Nupe and Bariba (18th century)
Ashanti Empire Conquests and Massacres of Denkyira and Akyem (late 17th-18th centuries)
Sokoto Caliphate Jihad Massacres of Hausa and Fulani Dissenters (early 19th century)
Igala Kingdom Wars Against Idoma and Ebira (18th century)
Benin Kingdom Punitive Expeditions Against Esan and Afemai (16th-18th centuries)
 
I'd argue Rice & MENA, for the fact that the only reason they didn't do what we did was for the simple fact that they lacked the tech and means to do so

Also, Jews are technically MENA-Euro mutts and they orchestrated the Holodomor and other atrocities in Soviet history
Arabs, but they don't have the firepower to execute their genocidal ideas.
This, but also East Asians
I'd say Native Americans purely because of being technologically behind the rest of the world by the time said rest of the world came to them. The percentage of people dying in conflicts scales pretty well with technological level, so they never really went away from 10-20% of men dying in warfare before their lands got taken over.
Good take, they were very nasty to each other and genocided other tribes a lot. Again, like others they lacked the means to do so.

Before Europeans showed up they had no notion of a shared identity, and even still fought one another with other Europeans picking sides
Why did no one vote for east Asia? Holy shit you guys unironically don’t even know history
Exactly, they were brutal

Again, tech is the difference

Nearly 40 million people were believed to be killed in Mongol invasions which led to an empire that spanned 22 per cent of the Earth's surface

  • Taiping Rebellion (1850-1864): This was a devastating civil war between the Qing dynasty and the Hakka-led Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. It is one of the bloodiest conflicts in human history, with a death toll estimated between 20 and 30 million people, and some estimates going higher. Most deaths were caused by plague, famine, and warfare.
  • An Lushan Rebellion (755-763 AD): This rebellion against the Tang Dynasty is one of the deadliest wars in history in terms of percentage of the world's population at the time. Historians surmise up to 10 million people perished, while some estimates go as high as 36 million.
  • An Lushan Rebellion (755-763 AD): This rebellion against the Tang Dynasty is one of the deadliest wars in history in terms of percentage of the world's population at the time. Historians surmise up to 10 million people perished, while some estimates go as high as 36 million.
  • An Lushan Rebellion (755-763 AD): This rebellion against the Tang Dynasty is one of the deadliest wars in history in terms of percentage of the world's population at the time. Historians surmise up to 10 million people perished, while some estimates go as high as 36 million.
Whites ignited the ethnic conflict in those regions though
They had existed for hundreds or even thousands of years, you really think all African tribes or whatever lived in some harmonious peace? JFLLLLLLLL
Whites, seriously how is this even a conversation
Because the point we're making is that other groups would have been worse had they had the same tech+means
The number is even higher if you count indirect forms like colonial powers inciting tensions in their territories, case in point Rwanda
And that tension was there and would have happened...

And again see above, look what the Mongols did
Why are you denying this? It's a fact SSA was not developed at all prior to Euro arrivals
Sub-Saharans = south of the Saharan
The horn of africa is south of the sahara
Don't really know why you're getting so pressed about this
No dude, you guys are genetically different and culturally always were more connected to Eurasia

SSA=Anything below the Horn and Sahara and more or less is genetically/racially ref. the groups there
And are responsible for the vast majority of genocides in history
Ok and? So what does that mean? Should we be held accountable for that still, despite the fact our countries and tech now offer your kind better lives?
 
This forum used to be good, now it's became racedenialSJWreddit2.0, even by users i sadly used to like such as @Skelly

I hope this place gets nuked soon
 
I vote for Africans. They kill each other all the times, and it is just that we don't hear a lot from them. There are literal genocidal mass killings daily in shitholes like Congo.
 
Africans, Middle Eastern, Spics, these are the most savage primitive genocidal races
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top