Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment What is the most genocidal race?

who

  • Africans

    Votes: 13 20.6%
  • Whites (Europeans)

    Votes: 20 31.7%
  • Middle Easterners (Iranians, Jews, Arabs, Turks etc)

    Votes: 22 34.9%
  • East Asians

    Votes: 5 7.9%
  • Southeast Asians (including Maori)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Indians (including Pakistanis)

    Votes: 1 1.6%
  • Latins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Native Americans (before intermixing by colonizers)

    Votes: 2 3.2%

  • Total voters
    63
AsiaCel

AsiaCel

shalom goyim
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
30,228
Online time
1d 1h
Vote or I will force every Jew and Muslim to eat pork and every Hindu on this site to eat cows.

I vote for Africans. They kill each other all the times, and it is just that we don't hear a lot from them. There are literal genocidal mass killings daily in shitholes like Congo.
 
Vote or I will force every Jew and Muslim to eat pork and every Hindu on this site to eat cows
proud of the armenian genocide + every single other genocide lmao. but aside from my nationalism it would probably be western europeans, due to infighting, religious wars, crusades(where they ate babies) and endemic poverty.
 
Whites by a long shot
 
Whites by a long shot
Why so? Did you know for example the king Leopold genocide was fake and the pictures were actually from Muslims enslaving Africans?
 
Arabs, but they don't have the firepower to execute their genocidal ideas.
 
whites because they tried it with nearly every race even other whites
 
whites because they tried it with nearly every race even other whites
The only race we ever did a real full genocide of was red indians (through race-mixing in Latin America and death/deportation in USA) however, they did the exact same things to other tribes. They consistently would wipe 90% of rival tribes and they ate people alive. They'd have done the same to Europe
 
Whites created capitalism which has inadvertently killed millioms and worsened lives of many
 
Why so? Did you know for example the king Leopold genocide was fake and the pictures were actually from Muslims enslaving Africans?
10 million Africans dead is. Fake to you?
What about the famines in india? Or killing all the native americans
 
10 million Africans dead is. Fake to you?
What about the famines in india? Or killing all the native americans
Read through this thread

View: https://x.com/poperespecter1/status/1944051454743871502?t=3U0FHsLdsVWnMW3v-DmE6g&s=19


Also I straight up mentioned the "native Americans" (red indians). But note that

A. They genocided eachother all the time before we came, the only difference between us and them was our superior intelligence/technology

B. We were there BEFORE them. Whites were the real natives and they stole the land from us.
Screenshot 2025 04 23 10 28 16 95 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb

Screenshot 2025 05 05 14 45 37 00 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
 
Whites created capitalism which has inadvertently killed millioms and worsened lives of many
Capitalism is a natural phenomenon resulting from technological progress. No group of people created it, but whites were the first to go through this phase of economic development.

10 million Africans dead is.
Africans are only as numerous as they are today thanks to white technology and altruism. Without them, they would not be among the fastest growing peoples on earth.

Or killing all the native americans
The closest thing to a "genocide" committed by whites. But it still wasn't systematic or anything and was just a long standing struggle over land between several native tribes and the US government. The natives seeing themselves as a unified group is a modern narrative. They had been massacring each other for millennia before whites arrived on the continent.
 
Hitler and Stalin are both white? Your point?

Mao wasn't genociding, he was putting forward a better future through sacrifice ( see great leap forward)
 
Mao wasn't genociding, he was putting forward a better future through sacrifice ( see great leap forward)
You can argue Hitler or Stalin were doing the same. It depends on your political views.
 
Capitalism is a natural phenomenon resulting from technological progress. No group of people created it, but whites were the first to go through this phase of economic development.


Africans are only as numerous as they are today thanks to white technology and altruism. Without them, they would not be among the fastest growing peoples on earth.


The closest thing to a "genocide" committed by whites. But it still wasn't systematic or anything and was just a long standing struggle over land between several native tribes and the US government. The natives seeing themselves as a unified group is a modern narrative. They had been massacring each other for millennia before whites arrived on the continent.

"Capitalism is a natural phenomenon resulting from technological progress. No group of people created it, but whites were the first to go through this phase of economic development."

> Capitalism is an idea, it had to come from someone's mind.

"Africans are only as numerous as they are today thanks to white technology and altruism. Without them, they would not be among the fastest growing peoples on earth."

> Your point? So them commiting atrocities is excused because they get mere chump change hand outs.


" The closest thing to a "genocide" committed by whites. But it still wasn't systematic or anything and was just a long standing struggle over land between several native tribes and the US government. The natives seeing themselves as a unified group is a modern narrative. They had been massacring each other for millennia before whites arrived on the continent."

> Natives were living in peaceful harmony before whites brought their war mongering ways. Natives didn't even have the notion of owning land until Europeans came
 
You can argue Hitler or Stalin were doing the same. It depends on your political views.
Hitler was a mad man set out to kill jews.

Yeah tbh you could say it for stalin
 
I'd say Native Americans purely because of being technologically behind the rest of the world by the time said rest of the world came to them. The percentage of people dying in conflicts scales pretty well with technological level, so they never really went away from 10-20% of men dying in warfare before their lands got taken over.
 
When they Samson Option us (not entirely out of the question) you'll have your answer
 
Vote or I will force every Jew and Muslim to eat pork and every Hindu on this site to eat cows.

I vote for Africans. They kill each other all the times, and it is just that we don't hear a lot from them. There are literal genocidal mass killings daily in shitholes like Congo.
Why did no one vote for east Asia? Holy shit you guys unironically don’t even know history
 
Capitalism is an idea, it had to come from someone's mind.
It’s an idea insofar as gravity is. It’s an economic process that was discovered and studied by economists. No one sat down one day and devised capitalism, as an economic system.
Your point? So them commiting atrocities is excused because they get mere chump change hand outs.
What atrocities are you talking about? The Congo? Europeans never had any plans to wipe out all Africans on earth.
Natives were living in peaceful harmony before whites brought their war mongering ways. Natives didn't even have the notion of owning land until Europeans came
You are retarded if you believe that, really retarded. It has been proven that the natives were very familiar with war and practiced it against each other. The natives were humans and like any humans they were naturally aggressive with an instinct to wage war. Outside of North America, they even had empires like the Aztecs or Incas.
 
Last edited:
> Natives were living in peaceful harmony before whites brought their war mongering ways. Natives didn't even have the notion of owning land until Europeans came
You are a blatant anti white Marxist. Here are examples of how that narrative is WRONG:

Cahokian Massacres

Anasazi (Ancestral Puebloan) Conflicts

Toltec-Mexica Wars (ca. 900–1200 CE, Central Mexico)

Iroquois Beaver Wars Prelude (ca. 1400–1600 CE, Northeast U.S./Canada)

Iroquois Wars Against the Huron and Erie (1640s–1650s, Great Lakes Region)

Pequot War (1636–1637, New England)

Beaver Wars Expansion (1650s–1701, Eastern North America)

Comanche Raids on Apache and Pueblo Tribes (1700s–1800s, Great Plains/Southwest)

Lakota Sioux Campaigns Against the Crow and Pawnee (1800s, Northern Plains)
 
> Your point? So them commiting atrocities is excused because they get mere chump change hand outs
1761262387232

Over 2 trillion dollars has been given to Africa to explode their population. We were also very generous during colonialism, giving them cities and technology in return for the resources they would never know how to process or use anyways.

Before Europeans came to subsaharan Africa, they had no written language, hadn't invented the wheel, and were stuck in the stone age.

They hadn't even reached the bronze age with all their resources, while Europeans were creatung giant castles, cathedrals, cannons, and guns
 
It’s an idea insofar as gravity is. It’s an economic process that was discovered and studied by economists. No one sat down one day and devised capitalism, as an economic system.

What atrocities are talking about? The Congo? Europeans never had any plans to wipe out all Africans on earth.

You are retarded if you believe that, really retarded. It has been proven that the natives were very familiar with war and practiced it against each other. The natives were humans and like any humans they were naturally aggressive with an instinct to wage war. Outside of North America, they even had empires like the Aztecs or Incas.

"It’s an idea insofar as gravity is. It’s an economic process that was discovered and studied by economists. No one sat down one day and devised capitalism, as an economic system."

> Discovered? It was created. Go look at any untouched tribe or primitive humans in this modern day. They live by a communist framework. Capitalism is made up by rich whites to exploit the rest.

" What atrocities are talking about? The Congo? Europeans never had any plans to wipe out all Africans on earth."

> Europeans during the scramble for Africa, ravaged the the continent. They came in and enslaved africans, extracted resources with slave labor and killed anyone deemes unfit to work. Did the africans allow them to just come in and destroy the local communities like that?


"You are retarded if you believe that, really retarded. It has been proven that the natives were very familiar with war and practiced it against each other. The natives were humans and like any humans they were naturally aggressive with an instinct to wage war. Outside of North America, they even had empires like the Aztecs or Incas."

> They weren't genociding anyone, they were just living off the land as any tribe would do, until whites came from the Atlantic and took everything.

Maybe if you stopped reading into all the alt right version of history, you'd have a better grasp and knowledge on how the world actually works.
 
View attachment 1580239
Over 2 trillion dollars has been given to Africa to explode their population. We were also very generous during colonialism, giving them cities and technology in return for the resources they would never know how to process or use anyways.

Before Europeans came to subsaharan Africa, they had no written language, hadn't invented the wheel, and were stuck in the stone age.

They hadn't even reached the bronze age with all their resources, while Europeans were creatung giant castles, cathedrals, cannons, and guns
The damage they've done to the country impeded it's natrual growth. Giving them money now means nothing
 
Europeans during the scramble for Africa, ravaged the the continent. They came in and enslaved africans, extracted resources with slave labor and killed anyone deemes unfit to work. Did the africans allow them to just come in and destroy the local communities like that?
Actually they were the first people to ban slavery.

1. Europeans banned the slavery of Africans by other Europeans and also by Africans. Before they did this, Africans had been enslaving each other for a very long time. It's Europeans who in fact ended the Muslim and African slavery of Africans

2. Slavery still happens to this day in Africa, by other Africans. There is no slavery in white countries

3. Arab countries allowed slavery until very recently, many banning it after WW2.
 
Actually they were the first people to ban slavery.

1. Europeans banned the slavery of Africans by other Europeans and also by Africans. Before they did this, Africans had been enslaving each other for a very long time. It's Europeans who in fact ended the Muslim and African slavery of Africans

2. Slavery still happens to this day in Africa, by other Africans. There is no slavery in white countries

3. Arab countries allowed slavery until very recently, many banning it after WW2.
Slavery still exists to this very day. It's called capitalism
 
Slavery still exists to this very day. It's called capitalism
Stop being such a Marxist. Anyways, if you were even a good Marxist you would follow his own words about how race does not actually matter and how everything is simply a result of material conditions, he said himself that apartheid in South Africa wasn't the evil of white people but was simply in the interest of the bourgeoise class and that evil vs good doesn't exist. You are a failure of a Marxist which is already a bad thing
 
Discovered? It was created. Go look at any untouched tribe or primitive humans in this modern day. They live by a communist framework. Capitalism is made up by rich whites to exploit the rest.
You're fucking retarded holy shit. Even Marx makes it clear that capitalism is a necessary and natural stage of development that comes from technological advancement for historical peoples to reach communism. Primitive communism, which I doubt is universal, is something else and only exists in societies that lack any technological capacity. Marx was not a primitivist and did not see it as ideal.
Europeans during the scramble for Africa, ravaged the the continent. They came in and enslaved africans, extracted resources with slave labor and killed anyone deemes unfit to work. Did the africans allow them to just come in and destroy the local communities like that?
When Europeans left sub-saharan Africa, they left behind hospitals, railroads, cities, etc. in this part of the continent that had never existed before. Africans had a higher standard of living and could read and write better than they could ever have dreamed of before colonialism. The Europeans saw these spear-throwing niggers and tried with some success to make them better. But with sub-saharans, you could only go so far...
Maybe if you stopped reading into all the alt right version of history, you'd have a better grasp and knowledge on how the world actually works.
Retard. You have no arguments.
 
Last edited:
Stop being such a Marxist. Anyways, if you were even a good Marxist you would follow his own words about how race does not actually matter and how everything is simply a result of material conditions, he said himself that apartheid in South Africa wasn't the evil of white people but was simply in the interest of the bourgeoise class and that evil vs good doesn't exist. You are a failure of a Marxist which is already a bad thing
Bourgeoisie = white
 
You're fucking retarded holy shit. Even Marx makes it clear that capitalism is a necessary and natural stage of development that comes from technological advancement for historical peoples to reach communism. Primitive communism, which I doubt is universal, is something else and only exists in societies that lack any technological capacity. Marx was not a primitivist and did not see it as ideal.

When Europeans left sub-saharan Africa, they left behind hospitals, railroads, cities, etc. in this part of the continent that had never existed before. Africans had a higher standard of living and could read and write better than they could ever have dreamed of before colonialism. The Europeans saw these spear-throwing niggers and tried with some success to make them better. But with sub-saharans, you could only go so far...

Retard. You have no arguments.
Where did you learn history from? PoL?

"You're fucking retarded holy shit. Even Marx makes it clear that capitalism is a necessary and natural stage of development that comes from technological advancement for historical peoples to reach communism. Primitive communism, which I doubt is universal, is something else and only exists in societies that lack any technological capacity. Marx was not a primitivist and did not see it as ideal."

> I am not a Marxist

" When Europeans left sub-saharan Africa, they left behind hospitals, railroads, cities, etc. in this part of the continent that had never existed before. Africans had a higher standard of living and could read and write better than they could ever have dreamed of before colonialism. The Europeans saw these spear-throwing niggers and tried with some success to make them better. But with sub-saharans, you could only go so far..."

> all they built was for themselves, they never teached the africans how to maintain any of it. Africans were doing better before colonialism, holy shit, you are double digit, single celled if you think Europeans made indigenous people's lives better.
 
Please, for the love of god, get some better sources other than PoL
 
never teached the africans how to maintain any of it.
They still can't because Africans are low IQ and couldn't even escape the stone age before we gave them technology.

Africans were doing better before colonialism
They were retarded cannibals who killed each other both before and after we showed up
Screenshot 2025 05 20 15 56 19 52 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 05 16 20 54 13 26 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
 
Good discussion every race would be genocidal if they had the choice Western Europe imperialism is the most well known but in the Middle East they were brutal but less known as well as the rest of Asia tough question I really don't know
 
What race are the richest people in the world?
Btw bourgeoise isn't defined by wealth, it is defined by a class relationship. And if it was defined by wealth, there are still wealthy nonwhites
 
Africans were doing better before colonialism
Rwandan Genocide (Hutu against Tutsi, 1994)

Burundian Genocide (Tutsi against Hutu, 1972)

Burundian Genocide (Hutu against Tutsi, 1993)

Darfur Genocide (Arab militias against non-Arab Africans, 2003–present)

Isaaq Genocide (Somali government against Isaaq clan, 1987–1989)

Anfal Campaign

1994 Burundi Massacres (Hutu against Tutsi)

1972 Ikiza (Tutsi army against Hutu intellectuals)

South Sudan Ethnic Cleansing (Dinka against Nuer, 2013–present)

Central African Republic Conflict (Anti-Balaka against Seleka Muslims, 2013–present)

Ituri Conflict Massacres (Hema against Lendu, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1999–2003)

Kivu Conflicts (Mai-Mai against Rwandan Hutu refugees, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996–1997)

Mfecane Wars (Zulu against neighboring Nguni groups, 1815–1840)

Ethiopian Red Terror (Derg against political opponents including ethnic groups, 1977–1978)

Tigray War Atrocities (Ethiopian government against Tigrayans, 2020–2022)

RSF Massacres in West Darfur (Rapid Support Forces against Masalit, 2023–present)

Hutu Power Massacres in Gisenyi (Hutu against Tutsi, 1990–1994)

Interahamwe Killings in Refugee Camps (RPF against Hutu refugees, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996)
 
Europeans and it's not even close. Basically all the major genocides were committed by them Ie Holocaust, Belgian Congo, Armenian Genocide, Holodomor, All the soviet massacres, all the pogroms, transatlantic slave trade, settlement of the new world the list goes on.
 
Rwandan Genocide (Hutu against Tutsi, 1994)

Burundian Genocide (Tutsi against Hutu, 1972)

Burundian Genocide (Hutu against Tutsi, 1993)

Darfur Genocide (Arab militias against non-Arab Africans, 2003–present)

Isaaq Genocide (Somali government against Isaaq clan, 1987–1989)

Anfal Campaign

1994 Burundi Massacres (Hutu against Tutsi)

1972 Ikiza (Tutsi army against Hutu intellectuals)

South Sudan Ethnic Cleansing (Dinka against Nuer, 2013–present)

Central African Republic Conflict (Anti-Balaka against Seleka Muslims, 2013–present)

Ituri Conflict Massacres (Hema against Lendu, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1999–2003)

Kivu Conflicts (Mai-Mai against Rwandan Hutu refugees, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996–1997)

Mfecane Wars (Zulu against neighboring Nguni groups, 1815–1840)

Ethiopian Red Terror (Derg against political opponents including ethnic groups, 1977–1978)

Tigray War Atrocities (Ethiopian government against Tigrayans, 2020–2022)

RSF Massacres in West Darfur (Rapid Support Forces against Masalit, 2023–present)

Hutu Power Massacres in Gisenyi (Hutu against Tutsi, 1990–1994)

Interahamwe Killings in Refugee Camps (RPF against Hutu refugees, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996)
A good portion of these were sparked by European neo colonialism
 
Whites ignited the ethnic conflict in those regions though
Here's a list that happened with zero European influence I believe

Mfecane/Difaqane Wars (Zulu expansions against Nguni, Sotho, and other groups, early 19th century)
Shaka Zulu's Massacres of Swazi and Ndwandwe Peoples (1810s-1820s)
Dingane Zulu's Executions of Hlubi and Nyawo Clans (1830s)
Senzangakhona's Purges in Zulu Kingdom (late 18th century)
Mpande Zulu's Campaign Against Dingane's Faction (1838-1840)
Mzilikazi Ndebele's Raids on Sotho and Tswana Communities (1820s-1830s)
Great Trek-Era Conflicts Between Matabele and Griqua Peoples (1830s)
Ethiopian Emperor Susenyos's Forced Conversion Massacres of Agaw and Sidama (1620s-1630s)
Lebna Dengel Ethiopian Wars Against Agau and Somali Clans (early 16th century)
Songhai Empire's Conquests and Mass Killings of Mossi and Dogon (late 15th-early 16th century)
Askia Muhammad's Purges of Soninke and Mandinka in Songhai (1490s-1520s)
Mali Empire's Sack of Timbuktu and Tuareg Massacres (1430s)
Bornu Empire's Wars Against Kotoko and Sao Peoples (14th-15th centuries)
Kanem-Bornu Conquests and Extermination of Tebu Nomads (12th-13th centuries)
Great Zimbabwe Conflicts with Tonga and Shona Subgroups (13th-14th centuries)
Mapungubwe Kingdom Raids on Khoisan Foragers (11th-12th centuries)
Aksumite Kingdom's Suppression of Beja and Agaw Rebellions (4th-6th centuries)
Nubian Kingdom Massacres of Noba Tribes (4th century)
Bantu Migrations and Genocide of Khoisan Hunter-Gatherers (1st-5th centuries AD)
Kingdom of Kongo Wars Against Teke and Luba Peoples (14th century)
Luba Empire's Expansion Killings of Lunda Clans (16th century)
Lunda Empire Conquests Against Chokwe and Kaonde (17th century)
Buganda Kingdom Purges of Banyoro and Basoga (18th century)
Bunyoro-Iteso Wars and Mass Killings (late 18th-early 19th century)
Dahomey Kingdom's Annual Slave Raids and Sacrifices of Yoruba Captives (17th-19th centuries)
Oyo Empire's Campaigns Against Nupe and Bariba (18th century)
Ashanti Empire Conquests and Massacres of Denkyira and Akyem (late 17th-18th centuries)
Sokoto Caliphate Jihad Massacres of Hausa and Fulani Dissenters (early 19th century)
Igala Kingdom Wars Against Idoma and Ebira (18th century)
Benin Kingdom Punitive Expeditions Against Esan and Afemai (16th-18th centuries)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top