Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based What is morally wrong with being attracted to teen girls?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 23682
  • Start date
nothing

moralfags keep crying
 
As far as I am concerned, morality is about ACTIONS. So if you are "tempted", but don't act on that impulse, you are innocent. Jesus was tempted in the desert, but because he was morally "perfect", he didn't give in to that temptation.

If I see some 13 year old girl in booty shorts, and I think she's hot, but I don't approach her, I'm innocent, right? So why would anyone get mad because I feel attraction.? It's a scientifically proven fact that attraction is NOT a choice. How can you be mad at someone for something they DIDN'T CHOOSE?
Society thinks thoughts are voluntary and is trying to push more and more responsibility onto people despite science saying elsewise. Except when it benefits the agenda of hypergamy that is. Thought police in full force, and it's not even a tycoon or secret agent.
 
Sounds pretty familiar except I think mine was 14/20s
if it was quite common before. The problem is that now women study and go to university that has also influenced the fact that it is wrong to marry a woman who is already having a period, under 18
 
Silly inkwell! Those are reserved for chads!
 
i think attraction to teens is way more natural than homosexuality (which leftists call "natural")

and they think homosexuality is natural because it's found in many species even though incest, necrophilia and eating poop also is found in many species. and homosexuality isn't needed to prevent overpopulation because straight people can contribute by avoiding sex
 
Nothing at all tbh. It's been normal since the beginning of time, but modern soyciety has started to take a turn towards a gynocentric motive, so they label all men who are openly attracted to teenage girls as pedophiles and constantly demonize them in order to boost the SMV and sexual power of saggy, old, fat feminists.
 
They want it to be 23 most likely.
 
I dont see anything wrong with teeens tbh
 
It's only looked down upon if the guy is ugly or looks too old. If it's a 25 year old drug dealer, gang member or just some chad the teen girls don't care.
If a 25 year old foid fucked a 13 year old boy no one would care too. That's why the "AoC" is made moral fagging only used to suppress non-chad men's sexuality.
 
If a 25 year old foid fucked a 13 year old boy no one would care too. That's why the "AoC" is made moral fagging only used to suppress non-chad men's sexuality.
The usual. Double standards. More women needed than men in this world therefore women have more rights because there are not enough women.
 
The usual. Double standards. More women needed than men in this world therefore women have more rights because there are not enough women.
Holes who use birth control and ride the cc are way less needed than uncucked men.
 
Nothing. Freedom of thought.
 
Holes who use birth control and ride the cc are way less needed than uncucked men.
Because it's their nature to be selfish like that and ignore the moral or societal or economic costs.
We can't legally or morally control them, then what can we do? Yes, lost cause and lost breeders.
Still, you need only 1 man for every 9 women or so. Even if pregnancy was non existent and women laid eggs or something, they'd still be worth more for other reasons.
Uncucked men are rare but I think it's easier and less "DONT STEP ON MY FREEDUMZ" to uncuck soy men than to convince women to actually care about the opposite gender as a whole. That said, many soys are probably lost cause too and real men are rare.

Do you think incels count as real men because of our mental strength to not lash out at ourself or others around us despite this cruel reality and people being more and more upfront how they are genetically elitist/blackpilled as normals? Or do you need to still be Chad and redpilled?
 
you need only 1 man for every 9 women or so. Even if pregnancy was non existent and women laid eggs or something, they'd still be worth more for other reasons.
Artificial wombs will replace them in a few years.
Do you think incels count as real men because of our mental strength to not lash out at ourself or others around us despite this cruel reality and people being more and more upfront how they are genetically elitist/blackpilled as normals? Or do you need to still be Chad and redpilled?
Yes, uncucked blackpilled men are a million times better than redpilled chads and normies.
 
Artificial wombs will replace them in a few years.

Yes, uncucked blackpilled men are a million times better than redpilled chads and normies.
In a few years? How many is few? They already go around showing their metaphorical dicks over how you can technically get a woman pregnant with bone marrow from another woman.

Ok, I see you agree then that facing the truth is better. I don't know if it really makes us morally better though because those chads and normies never have the difficulties needed to realize how shit life is for most men today. Also relates to what I told PersonalityInkwell in another thread about how chads are not really blackpilled at all mostly and are actually less so than most women. Having it easy makes you blind to others' difficulties.
 
If you just look at her on the streets and feel attraction, most people will be ok with it. But if you downloaded a pic of a girl like that naked from the internet for free, people will want your life ruined.
 
In a few years? How many is few?
I think not later than 2040, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it much earlier.
Ok, I see you agree then that facing the truth is better. I don't know if it really makes us morally better though because those chads and normies never have the difficulties needed to realize how shit life is for most men today. Also relates to what I told PersonalityInkwell in another thread about how chads are not really blackpilled at all mostly and are actually less so than most women. Having it easy makes you blind to others' difficulties.
If most those chads and normies were in our shoes they'd rope or harm other people.
 
mortality is most often based on putting yourself in the shoes of someone being acted on and thinking “how would i feel about this if it was done to me” I think
That is often called, "the reasonable man" rule. Where, basically, if it's something a reasonable man would do - such as carry an illegal style of weapon to deal with a legitimate perceived threat - then that particular law WAS NOT BROKEN. Due to circumstances.
 
I think not later than 2040, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it much earlier.

If most those chads and normies were in our shoes they'd rope or harm other people.
Only because they were normal until then. If they were born like us they'd become like us.
If you just look at her on the streets and feel attraction, most people will be ok with it. But if you downloaded a pic of a girl like that naked from the internet for free, people will want your life ruined.
I love this logic, same goes for social media where softcore porn runs rampant.
Fun fact: if you go onto less-used porn sites and click around too much sometimes you "accidentally" get redirected to literal CP sites or very close to that. Absolutely JFL at this fact. :feelsseriously:
 
Only because they were normal until then. If they were born like us they'd become like us.
We're still better because we're going through the trouble of dealing with the truth, unlike those soft cucks and chads.
 
We're still better because we're going through the trouble of dealing with the truth, unlike those soft cucks and chads.
Only we have to do that.
 
The answer to your question is nothing. Women just find it repulsive if your smv is low as if you are old and not thugmaxxed.
 
We're still better because we're going through the trouble of dealing with the truth, unlike those soft cucks and chads. @Robtical
One other point here is that in one way only we are lucky in that living our whole lives as shit has made us tough. Imagine a non-incel in our shoes a month, they'd kts.

The answer to your question is nothing. Women just find it repulsive if your smv is low as if you are old and not thugmaxxed.
People will debate numbers and so on but basically yeah.
 
One other point here is that in one way only we are lucky in that living our whole lives as shit has made us tough. Imagine a non-incel in our shoes a month, they'd kts.
Another good thing about knowing the truth is we can never get cucked, because we know old used foids will only be faithful to chads.
 
Another good thing about knowing the truth is we can never get cucked, because we know old used foids will only be faithful to chads.
doubt even them. always a greener lawn.
 
N O T H I N G
O
T
H
I
N
G
 
it doesn’t have to do with morals. You don’t refrain from approaching a teen girl Girl because you’re such a beacon of morality. You don’t approach because the consequences will destroy your life.
Best way of putting it honestly :feelsthink:
 
explain to me how being attracted to teen girls, while not approaching them, is "bad", while what Jesus did in the desert was "good" for "overcoming temptation".


Because it's a social construct.

Our ancient ancestors didn't have birthdays, calendars. They judged a person's attractiveness and suitability for fornication by eyesight.
 
i'd like to know what morality is based on then so I can shove the stupid logic of moralfags down their throat
There are different schools of thought on this, there is no single unified answer. It's similar to how there are so many incels but only a tiny fraction of them are blackpilled
 
There are different schools of thought on this, there is no single unified answer. It's similar to how there are so many incels but only a tiny fraction of them are blackpilled
schools of thoughts is cope

there's nothing wrong with it at all
 
Nothing wrong with acting on that feeling though.

If she bleeds, she's ready to breed.
Truth. Nothing morally wrong with it if she is biologically and emotionally ready, BUT the Chad-dominated legal system exists to oppress all other men.
 
schools of thoughts is cope

there's nothing wrong with it at all
I agree with you that there's nothing morally wrong about feeling sexual attraction towards something. I was replying to your question about "what morality is". There are many different ways of defining morality, and what is considered "right" and "wrong" also varies wildly across different cultures. The only thing that can be said for sure is that morality is a social construct and on a cosmic scale it is inconsequential.
 
Teens are innocent angels sweaty they dont know what sex is. Oh ignore all those onlyfan girls they are just being manipulated sweaty NAWALT :bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
 
Teens are innocent angels sweaty they dont know what sex is. Oh ignore all those onlyfan girls they are just being manipulated sweaty NAWALT :bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
@ionlycopenow @mylifeistrash @TheSecondComing @LOLI BREEDING @Made in Heaven @Mainländer @Irredeemable @ScornedStoic lifefuel
 
not a thing and foids also like teen chads
 
It's only looked down upon if the guy is ugly or looks too old. If it's a 25 year old drug dealer, gang member or just some chad the teen girls don't care.

THIS. I don't think people understand how powerful the HALO effect is. If Jeremy Meeks or Michael B. Jordan approached a 13-year old teen girl she wouldn't say shit, he'd be blowing her back out before you even blink your eyes. She'll probably even invite her girlfriends over for an orgy. And most importantly...NOBODY would ever label CHAD or look down on him for his actions while an UGLY guy would be in PRISON or SHUNNED by society FOR LIFE for the SAME actions.

Meanwhile two PUAs in London got locked up in prison for just APPROACHING women.

It's NOT illegal to approach women or fuck teen women, it's illegal to be UGLY.
 
There is nothing wrong with that, the only reason it seems wrong is because of Jews and (((Society))) making attraction to younger girls a (((disorder))) in order to more problems for Western Civilization so White Men can't have a young virgin wife and a secure future
 
@ionlycopenow @mylifeistrash @TheSecondComing @LOLI BREEDING @Made in Heaven @Mainländer @Irredeemable @ScornedStoic lifefuel
View attachment 312953
06C7B6AD CA60 40CF 98C9 98E28CA39531
 
Truth. Nothing morally wrong with it if she is biologically and emotionally ready, BUT the Chad-dominated legal system exists to oppress all other men.
The reason people feign disgust at this is two fold. One, they have been programmed to reject the notion of a female submitting to a male, and they know a younger female will more willingly submit herself to an older male, and do it with glee.

Two, they imagine the type of man who wants an 11-12 year old to be a ITcel, yet many emperors and chads often had brides this young too. If it's chad, there would be no problem
@ionlycopenow @mylifeistrash @TheSecondComing @LOLI BREEDING @Made in Heaven @Mainländer @Irredeemable @ScornedStoic lifefuel
View attachment 312953
:forcedsmile: I'm gonna coom

how old are they?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top