trying to ascend
Oldcel KHHV
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2020
- Posts
- 15,961
Title
South korea and Japan .Canada, usa europe, japan, australia, new zealand and south korea
They are as [UWSL]antagonistic [/UWSL]to europe as it gets, since they were never colonized by an european power (muh USA intervention)U mean they're not their political systems and modern culture is identical to europe and usa.
Answer the question, what constitutes it? In your opinionWho the fuck cares?
Why?????????????????????Option 2 minus brazil
You said culture, I cited one example why their culture, in its core, differs from european one.Eastern philisophy dont mean shit these says lmao
+ they are all rich and allied 2 europe and usa
I cant inagine any1 would think dirt poor brazil is western lol
tbhOption 2 minus brazil
brazil is the biggest shithole on earthWhy?????????????????????
So? What does this have to do with western? Latin america is just the third world of the west, but it's still part of ittbh
brazil is the biggest shithole on earth
nahSo? What does this have to do with western? Latin america is just the third world of the west, but it's still part of it
Thiswestern europe and north america only
How not? It's culturally western and so is most of latin americaI have not seen any context where Brazil is referred to as part of “the west”
I have never been to Latin America but it does not seem like it has a similar culture to Europe and the USA and I don’t think many from the USA or Europe would regard Latin America as part of the west.How not? It's culturally western and so is most of latin america
Similar culture does not entail similar development and criminality levels and that's issue that it's addressed in the southern border.I have never been to Latin America but it does not seem like it has a similar culture to Europe and the USA and I don’t think many from the USA or Europe would regard Latin America as part of the west.
If the USA regarded Mexico as the west they would treat the Mexican Border how they treat the Canadian border.
Only big cities mabybut it's still part of it
Canada, usa europe, japan, australia, new zealand and south korea
It's western europe and north america only. Australia is not technically "western" by geographic terms but is essentially western/british values.
UAE too?first world
I have never been to Latin America but it does not seem like it has a similar culture to Europe and the USA and I don’t think many from the USA or Europe would regard Latin America as part of the west.
If the USA regarded Mexico as the west they would treat the Mexican Border how they treat the Canadian border.
UAE too?
Sure it is, it's undeniably westernbrazil is in every option, not sure if gorillas do constitute shit to human world.
In what way is their culture any less western than say, USA or Canada?Whatever it is, Brazil & Latin America aren't part of it you LARPer
plus this jfl at op fetishizing brazilbrazil is the biggest shithole on earth
Being a shithole isn't exclusive with being westernplus this jfl at op fetishizing brazil
Actually it is.Being a shithole isn't exclusive with being western
How so? Being occidental never implied being developed, just that the culture is mostly derived from western europeActually it is.
Does turkey qualify? It fits the first world and colonial empire definition, even though it doesn't fits the great power, so doesn't portugal, spain, norway, italy and etcThe former first world powers and colonial empires.
The divide always was referring to the gap of technology between a side and the other. It is actually implied.How so? Being occidental never implied being developed, just that the culture is mostly derived from western europe
It's a shithole thoughDoes turkey qualify? It fits the first world and colonial empire definition, even though it doesn't fits the great power, so doesn't portugal, spain, norway, italy and etc
But that's why the term first world, as it's used today, and developed exist, that's why there is no reason to see occidental/western that wayThe divide always was referring to the gap of technology between a side and the other. It is actually implied.
It's just a terminology problem to name the same reality. One is the traditionnal way of naming it, the other is the "politically correct and inclusive" way, though it's cucked and in the end nobody consider seriously that countries such as Brazil is western or first world (except some funny local demogogue trying hard to get elected here by the white minority JFL )But that's why the term first world, as it's used today, and developed exist, that's why there is no reason to see occidental/western that way
How you call countries that have mostly european culture? Yes, it isn't first world. but its culture is as occidental as american culture and the same apply to most of latin americaIt's just a terminology problem to name the same reality. One is the traditionnal way of naming it, the other is the "politically correct and inclusive" way, though it's cucked and in the end nobody consider seriously that countries such as Brazil is western or first world (except some funny local demogogue trying hard to get elected here by the white minority JFL )
agreedOption 2 minus brazil
based pfpWho the fuck cares?
If you had to choose a k-on girls to have sex with, who would you choose?based pfp
If your country is in Europe, then it's european. Simple as that. The Americas are both very different one with another in terms of culture, and they have nothing in common in EUrope.How you call countries that have mostly european culture? Yes, it isn't first world. but its culture is as occidental as american culture and the same apply to most of latin america