With regards to the video @KING VON shared, trying to talk about the dickpill, I had a larger question about it that I thought would be better put in its own thread.
This guy manages to consistently make only smart, reasonable statements throughout the video, and then subsequently manages to throw that all away with his statement at the end. Even if we were to assume that his idealistic view was correct, and that's being generous, it then begs the question of 'what of the men who are not only not in the higher percentile, but the lower percentile?'
That is, what of men who are not only not 6.5 inches, but much smaller? 4 inches, 3 inches, and 2 inches? Women may not go for what they ideally want, since they can't get it, but they certainly always have the ability to outright reject someone if they receive the exact opposite of their expectations. Same thing can be said about height.
How much does this damn a man, then? It's so ridiculous. I'm not sure why people like this can very clearly see the objective facts of the black-pill, make only reasonable deductions, and then still refuse to outright just say the logical thing and affirm that the black-pill is indeed the truth. You've already identified and given an objective fact that women's preferences are only met by men in the 95th percentile, AKA 5% of men, and that this is consistently shown through out multiple studied with different sets of women.
Moreso, you now have proof that women DO break up with men who don't meet their ridiculous standards, and those were the ones that opted to be honest and say that they did.
And yet, you come to the conclusion of "it's alright guys some women don't care if you're not the 5% of men."
Why are normgroids like this? Are they scared to admit it or something? Why not just be honest with yourselves and come to the logical conclusion?
How foolish.
This guy manages to consistently make only smart, reasonable statements throughout the video, and then subsequently manages to throw that all away with his statement at the end. Even if we were to assume that his idealistic view was correct, and that's being generous, it then begs the question of 'what of the men who are not only not in the higher percentile, but the lower percentile?'
That is, what of men who are not only not 6.5 inches, but much smaller? 4 inches, 3 inches, and 2 inches? Women may not go for what they ideally want, since they can't get it, but they certainly always have the ability to outright reject someone if they receive the exact opposite of their expectations. Same thing can be said about height.
How much does this damn a man, then? It's so ridiculous. I'm not sure why people like this can very clearly see the objective facts of the black-pill, make only reasonable deductions, and then still refuse to outright just say the logical thing and affirm that the black-pill is indeed the truth. You've already identified and given an objective fact that women's preferences are only met by men in the 95th percentile, AKA 5% of men, and that this is consistently shown through out multiple studied with different sets of women.
Moreso, you now have proof that women DO break up with men who don't meet their ridiculous standards, and those were the ones that opted to be honest and say that they did.
And yet, you come to the conclusion of "it's alright guys some women don't care if you're not the 5% of men."
Why are normgroids like this? Are they scared to admit it or something? Why not just be honest with yourselves and come to the logical conclusion?
How foolish.
