Women are attracted to good looking men, they are unattracted to bad looking men. And they deem most men unattractive. Hence many men are lonely. Yet, I want to propose that their ability to form romantic relationships would be increased, were they not so trauma indulgent.
Shockingly, women sometimes enter bad relationships. Then the relationship ends, and they "learn" from it. Except the things they "learn" are preposterous. For example, a woman can complain that her previous boyfriend was uncaring, then break apart a new relationship because the guy does not reply to texts immediately. She has learned that "uncaring men hurt women", then sets out to "protect herself from uncaring men", setting not replying to texts immediately as "not caring". Of course, if this happens, the new guy was no chad and there was little, if any physical attraction coming from the woman. Still, were the woman not so trauma indulgent, not trying desperately to "learn", "grow" and "protect herself", maybe the relationship could've been formed.
Women of the present are treated better by men than women in the past, yet they love men less. How come? Let me make a historical comparison. Medieval peasants had to perform backbreaking labor, yet they revolted very little. Then comes the industrial revolution. The work in factory is hard, yet it is better than the one in a field. We know this by the fact that the life expectancy skyrockets. The factory workers actually had more free time than the peasants (as limited as it might be). But only with the industrial revolution, when things are better, actual large scale communist revolts do break out. And this is the same with women. When they have less to be traumatized about, they become more and more trauma indulgent.
Shockingly, women sometimes enter bad relationships. Then the relationship ends, and they "learn" from it. Except the things they "learn" are preposterous. For example, a woman can complain that her previous boyfriend was uncaring, then break apart a new relationship because the guy does not reply to texts immediately. She has learned that "uncaring men hurt women", then sets out to "protect herself from uncaring men", setting not replying to texts immediately as "not caring". Of course, if this happens, the new guy was no chad and there was little, if any physical attraction coming from the woman. Still, were the woman not so trauma indulgent, not trying desperately to "learn", "grow" and "protect herself", maybe the relationship could've been formed.
Women of the present are treated better by men than women in the past, yet they love men less. How come? Let me make a historical comparison. Medieval peasants had to perform backbreaking labor, yet they revolted very little. Then comes the industrial revolution. The work in factory is hard, yet it is better than the one in a field. We know this by the fact that the life expectancy skyrockets. The factory workers actually had more free time than the peasants (as limited as it might be). But only with the industrial revolution, when things are better, actual large scale communist revolts do break out. And this is the same with women. When they have less to be traumatized about, they become more and more trauma indulgent.
