Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill What bitter incels don’t understand is that we were previously living in unprecedented times, and historically not all men were meant to have sex

i am going to send some ** to this bitch just to piss her off. time to work
 
The day that sex robots and artificial wombs replace women is the day men are truly free.
 
Uhh we do understand. Not all men were meant to have sex, just like how not all women were meant to not get raped.
 
Unironically nice to see those bitches just saying the truth for once instead of the usual bluepilling gaslighting.

Yeah. It's over. It never began for us actually. We were never meant to be loved and never meant to feel the joy of intimacy, never meant to know what it's like to have another human being that unconditionally values us. We are meant to be expendable drones working to keep the system going, all the while living pitiful, miserable, lonely lives, because we aren't tall, handsome, rich or dark triad enough to be worthy of love.

I agree with all of that. What I don't agree with is society's insistence that we shouldn't be able to talk to each other about our shared shit life experiences, and I definitely don't agree with the efforts to force us to just accept our pathetic place in life rather than hope and try for something better as much as we can.
 
Thanks for informing me
 
I disagree. Seems like most people here don't though, so please help me understand if I'm getting it wrong.

What are these unprecedented times she's talking about? From what she says, it sounds like she is referring to an anomalous period of time when most men would get to have sexual relationships or reproduce, and now things are returning to how they were meant to be. This contradicts the recent explosion in female hypergamy that came with social media and the internet. So, that's how things used to be before?

Also, for the majority of history women were not the arbiters of which men reproduced. She's implying that women historically selected who they were married to or reproduced with. I'm not really a history buff but this doesn't sound true.
 
I disagree. Seems like most people here don't though, so please help me understand if I'm getting it wrong.

What are these unprecedented times she's talking about? From what she says, it sounds like she is referring to an anomalous period of time when most men would get to have sexual relationships or reproduce, and now things are returning to how they were meant to be. This contradicts the recent explosion in female hypergamy that came with social media and the internet. So, that's how things used to be before?

Also, for the majority of history women were not the arbiters of which men reproduced. She's implying that women historically selected who they were married to or reproduced with. I'm not really a history buff but this doesn't sound true.
In prehistoric times only 1 in 17 men or so reproduced. Human civilization was essentially a beta uprising that distributed women somewhat fairly (1 man 1 wife) among the male population. Ever since the sexual revolution in the 1970s we're now seeing the dissolution of civilization and the return to prehistoric times with the top percentages of men having harems and the bottom percentages having nothing.
 
In prehistoric times only 1 in 17 men or so reproduced. Human civilization was essentially a beta uprising that distributed women somewhat fairly (1 man 1 wife) among the male population. Ever since the sexual revolution in the 1970s we're now seeing the dissolution of civilization and the return to prehistoric times with the top percentages of men having harems and the bottom percentages having nothing.
Gotcha. I suppose this means good-bye to the comforts of civilization too, then. Wonder who that'll hit the hardest.
 
Gotcha. I suppose this means good-bye to the comforts of civilization too, then. Wonder who that'll hit the hardest.
Good news: women will become property once more.

Bad news: we'll still be poorfags in the hole real estate market.
 
Unironically nice to see those bitches just saying the truth for once instead of the usual bluepilling gaslighting.

Yeah. It's over. It never began for us actually. We were never meant to be loved and never meant to feel the joy of intimacy, never meant to know what it's like to have another human being that unconditionally values us. We are meant to be expendable drones working to keep the system going, all the while living pitiful, miserable, lonely lives, because we aren't tall, handsome, rich or dark triad enough to be worthy of love.

I agree with all of that. What I don't agree with is society's insistence that we shouldn't be able to talk to each other about our shared shit life experiences, and I definitely don't agree with the efforts to force us to just accept our pathetic place in life rather than hope and try for something better as much as we can.
Why would guys that have been rejected by the normie society be loyal to that society? Why would they be drones?
 
In prehistoric times only 1 in 17 men or so reproduced. Human civilization was essentially a beta uprising that distributed women somewhat fairly (1 man 1 wife) among the male population. Ever since the sexual revolution in the 1970s we're now seeing the dissolution of civilization and the return to prehistoric times with the top percentages of men having harems and the bottom percentages having nothing.
That was likely because alot more men died, not necessarily because chad was hogging all thr women

Anyways, I disagree with the premise of this thread. Men ARE entitled to sex and marriage if we are the ones funding the system and infrastructure through our fucking taxes. But I'm on my phone so can't type too much.

Maybe if I remember this thread later, I'll come back an give my full thoughts
 
If I shouldn't be entitled for sex, then foids shouldn't be entitled for a rape-free life.
That shit works both ways.
 
Anyways, I disagree with the premise of this thread. Men ARE entitled to sex and marriage if we are the ones funding the system and infrastructure through our fucking taxes.
Agreed. We are upholding our end of the social contract through working and generating tax dollars and productivity. All it's being used for though is subsidizing abortion and birth control for chad-crazed women. I hope laying flat goes into full force soon.
 
Why would guys that have been rejected by the normie society be loyal to that society? Why would they be drones?
They wouldn't, that's why I mentioned normies trying to stop us from wanting to change our societal situation and hoping that such a change is possible. They want us to be drones and believe that we shouldn't complain.
 
Agreed. We are upholding our end of the social contract through working and generating tax dollars and productivity. All it's being used for though is subsidizing abortion and birth control for chad-crazed women. I hope laying flat goes into full force soon.
Exactly, these entitled whores, including the reddit poster, act like their lives aren't held up by men. For all the shit talking she's doing of "huuuurrr some men shouldn't have sex", she wouldn't be saying that shit if she needed a man rather than the government stealing male income and collectively giving it to women. Welfare and other governmental programs that steal men's money and redistribute it to whores who have no relation to the men is why these bitches can even say what they say.

The entire western system exists to ensure women have e as little obligation to men as possible. The lie about 1 in 17 men not reproducing is a misinterpretation anyways based on the fact that most males would have died before breeding, not that they all lived sexless lives
 
Appeal to history/tradition/nature fallacy.
Just because we had caveman Chad harems and beta truecel gatherers in the past doesn't mean it was a good thing, or that modern society should strive in that direction.
 
Unironically nice to see those bitches just saying the truth for once instead of the usual bluepilling gaslighting.

Yeah. It's over. It never began for us actually. We were never meant to be loved and never meant to feel the joy of intimacy, never meant to know what it's like to have another human being that unconditionally values us. We are meant to be expendable drones working to keep the system going, all the while living pitiful, miserable, lonely lives, because we aren't tall, handsome, rich or dark triad enough to be worthy of love.

I agree with all of that. What I don't agree with is society's insistence that we shouldn't be able to talk to each other about our shared shit life experiences, and I definitely don't agree with the efforts to force us to just accept our pathetic place in life rather than hope and try for something better as much as we can.
Never began.
 
She isn't wrong, but in cave times most men died before they had a chance to reproduce. It wasn't a time of pure hypergamy, cock carousel, foid priviliege, etc. This was mostly fixed with civilization, but now we are reverting back to a good % of men not having sexual relationships. Except we aren't dying, society is failing us.
 
Ah so finally their admitting that we're regressing as species
 
Fucking whore. It's always women who say this crap. They live in constant bliss, and even have the fucking audacity to tell us that we should stop whining, stop demanding good life conditions, and instead work for them and go die in wars.
 
1682970413932

Imagine being this retard. "Females pick one that suits them in the wild" - yeah really faggot? How about rape? Why is it not legalized then, if dating is now like it's been in "the wild"?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →