M
meatflaps_pounder
Recruit
★★★
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Posts
- 229
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/28/opinion/sunday/ugly-you-may-have-a-case.html?_r=0
"A more radical solution may be needed: why not offer legal protections to the ugly, as we do with racial, ethnic and religious minorities, women and handicapped individuals?"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sc...w-your-childhood-is-written-in-your-face.html
"They found there was a strong association between social class and the symmetry of the face in men. Those with more symmetrical faces had more privileged and easier upbringings than those with asymmetrical features."
Paywall, but gym memberships are on massive rise over the years - everyone is gymceling, and if you don't look like you gymcel (i.e. bad genetics) you are discriminated against
https://www.statista.com/statistics/236123/us-fitness-center--health-club-memberships/
Even decades ago people knew about paternity fraud because doctors found kids having inheritable diseases that the "father" didn't have. Literally millions of men are cucks. Think about how bad it must be now, with open marriages, cuckoldry, and polyamory being the norm.
https://canadiancrc.com/Newspaper_Articles/Globe_and_Mail_Moms_Little_secret_14DEC02.aspx
LMAO @ anyone that thinks its harder to be a woman.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11395576/Men-are-now-objectified-more-than-women.html
1980s Article from the NYT about lookism
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/09/01/...nd-to-run-surprisingly-deep.html?pagewanted=1
When women are told a lie detector is being used they reveal their true partner count (which is usually at least double) (tee hee I only had sex with 2 guys)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-lie-detector-reveals-womens-sex-lies/
Females and males are actually more similar than cucktears et. al. contend:
Females just as visual as males:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/12554590
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sc...e-different-brains-claims-neuroscientist.html
Just like CNN, the washington post pushes the idea that monogamy is dead (they are right - alpha fux beta bux is the norm, and future, unless Islam takes over or something)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.211a70247a13
"
But that whole thing about “the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law . . . so long as he liveth”? To that, Jessie says no thanks.
More and more women will make this choice or consider it, Fisher expects; it’s in keeping with decades of widespread social change and women’s empowerment. Just 30 years ago, when Jessie was in her 20s, the average woman married at 23 and had her first child within the year. Her mother’s generation didn’t even leave the home. The majority simply raised kids, preached chastity and finger-waved their hair.
“That’s all sliding away from us,” Fisher said. “We’re shedding all these agricultural traditions . . . [and] returning to the way we were millions of years ago.”
"
For the actual peer reviewed research cited in the articles, we can look up each of the researchers and their publications.
Beating a dead horse here since we all know there is absolutely zero scientific evidence against the black pill, and even the anecdotal evidence is counter acted by other anecdotal evidence. Just thought it was interesting.
"A more radical solution may be needed: why not offer legal protections to the ugly, as we do with racial, ethnic and religious minorities, women and handicapped individuals?"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sc...w-your-childhood-is-written-in-your-face.html
"They found there was a strong association between social class and the symmetry of the face in men. Those with more symmetrical faces had more privileged and easier upbringings than those with asymmetrical features."
Paywall, but gym memberships are on massive rise over the years - everyone is gymceling, and if you don't look like you gymcel (i.e. bad genetics) you are discriminated against
https://www.statista.com/statistics/236123/us-fitness-center--health-club-memberships/
Even decades ago people knew about paternity fraud because doctors found kids having inheritable diseases that the "father" didn't have. Literally millions of men are cucks. Think about how bad it must be now, with open marriages, cuckoldry, and polyamory being the norm.
https://canadiancrc.com/Newspaper_Articles/Globe_and_Mail_Moms_Little_secret_14DEC02.aspx
LMAO @ anyone that thinks its harder to be a woman.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11395576/Men-are-now-objectified-more-than-women.html
1980s Article from the NYT about lookism
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/09/01/...nd-to-run-surprisingly-deep.html?pagewanted=1
When women are told a lie detector is being used they reveal their true partner count (which is usually at least double) (tee hee I only had sex with 2 guys)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-lie-detector-reveals-womens-sex-lies/
Females and males are actually more similar than cucktears et. al. contend:
Females just as visual as males:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/12554590
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sc...e-different-brains-claims-neuroscientist.html
Just like CNN, the washington post pushes the idea that monogamy is dead (they are right - alpha fux beta bux is the norm, and future, unless Islam takes over or something)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.211a70247a13
"
But that whole thing about “the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law . . . so long as he liveth”? To that, Jessie says no thanks.
More and more women will make this choice or consider it, Fisher expects; it’s in keeping with decades of widespread social change and women’s empowerment. Just 30 years ago, when Jessie was in her 20s, the average woman married at 23 and had her first child within the year. Her mother’s generation didn’t even leave the home. The majority simply raised kids, preached chastity and finger-waved their hair.
“That’s all sliding away from us,” Fisher said. “We’re shedding all these agricultural traditions . . . [and] returning to the way we were millions of years ago.”
"
For the actual peer reviewed research cited in the articles, we can look up each of the researchers and their publications.
Beating a dead horse here since we all know there is absolutely zero scientific evidence against the black pill, and even the anecdotal evidence is counter acted by other anecdotal evidence. Just thought it was interesting.