As in, to give excess men to whom pussy would never be available a purpose in society to keep them pacified and prevent antisocial, violent behavior from desperate men?
Was clerical celibacy in Catholicism and Buddhism designed to curb male Inceldom?
I'm pretty sure the extent to which you'd have to be genetically impoverished in premodernity not to get married would bar you from being a cleric.
I'm pretty sure it was a fraud for Pius publicly.
Meanwhile bishops are fucking nuns in there cells
Meanwhile bishops are fucking nuns in there cells
M
Yes. The concept of the priesthood and its clerical celibacy, alongside monogamy, was part of preserving the social order and allowed incels to make a comfortable living and be respected in society. Incels usually much were more moral and objective than depraved normies, something that is still true to this day.
There was nothing stopping them from breaking their celibacy and fucking in secret. And yes, most of the elite in the Catholic Church came from wealthy, respected, and influential families, not some kind of freak peasants. There were many popes who continued to fuck even while in celibacy.
Maybe less no genetically, but just impoverished since back then you needed to have money. (just like you need looks and height today) to get married similar to a betabuxx situation (and just like betabuxx today, even poor Chad, as rare as those are given they live on easy mode, would get some and the maiden married off to the local sub5 serf who sold her father a goat would ofc sleep with the chad knight behind her husbands back) I’m guessing there was a fairly good correlation between looks/height and social standing and therefore money among men in the medieval era for instance, so some poor, short ugly men likely took up the church to avoid shame by other men for not getting pussy
I believe that since celibacy was considered such a huge sacrifice in the service of God shows how it was not just the norm but expected for every man to have a woman and a family. Maybe we can learn a thing or two from the past.
No, they're honest about it not made it up over what you said, but for clean living. In christianity they think of sin as an abomination, something that strikes you as revolting. You do have a sense in your brain that lets you know something is cringe, right? If you look at it through "reverence" lens, as in not being a degenerate, it makes sense for useless sex with random women and masturbation to be sins, just like not helping someone in need as you pass by can be a sin simply because you're too coward, the bible has these instructions on who you should be as a man and if you dont follow them you Can't tell me someone strikes you as holy and then acts like a degenerate
Celibacy counts only when you have in fact a strong urge or the means to relapse. Wether the relapse is done with women or your hand it's irrelevant. If you don't actually suffer and learn to master the libido burning inside you, then your celibacy is all for shit. If I get sick and my dick can't get up for 2 years straight that's not celibacy. If I am 21 and lift daily and eat healthy and not cum for a week THAT'S celibacy, more than 99% of the world has ever done. The point is not to castrate yourself, you can just eat less if you want to not get horny and not cum, the point is to build energy inside of you, libido and sexual energy are geniuine physical things inside of you, this is why sin is called missing the mark, you help this universe with fuck-all if you cum your balls out on yourself daily or in a tissue.
The consequence of preventing men from accessing women is worse than freemixing IMO, encourages stealth pederasty and faggotry. Or they’ll just do extramarital sex on the down low
That prolly fucked catholicism in long run, it became a strong political position for nobles and way to make $$$
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
