I always hear about gun restrictions, adding more restrains and making people do various evaluations in order to pass, but they never ask why would someone still snap despite meeting all the requirements.
I mean shouldn't it be obvious that it's clearly the fault of society and people themselves rather than the fault of guns when no matter how many restrictions and regulations they pass, people will still find a way to shoot each other?
If we exclude low IQ nigger homicides alongside trannies, most of these school shooters/ extremists were men who were dealt a bad hand in society and bullied throughout their whole lives, and simply decided to fight back against their tyranny. Nobody ever says "maybe we should think about bullying and respecting people for who they are and not shame them for traits out of control".
Instead, there morons initiate that nerds in fact haven't been bullied enough and need to be shun back into lockers for them to be under control again, which means they only want to keep things in control.
Guns aren't evil. Their whole existence is actually opposite of that.
The purpose of gun is to secure every man and woman, no matter how small or weak they are , with the only ceiling being one's skill level, something mainly in your control. That's what normies hate. The fact that it evens the play field.
If society was just, no one would've had a reason to snap and kill with their guns, unless they were crazy.
Think about it like this:
If you give everyone a gun and nobody does anything except for few people, it means it's a minority issue of few crazies taking it upon innocents. But if you give everyone a gun, and people snap left and right, it's certainly a society problem and not a gun issue.
Restricting guns means they're afraid of opposition, because if their people truly respected them, they would've allowed guns knowing people won't harm anyone.
I mean shouldn't it be obvious that it's clearly the fault of society and people themselves rather than the fault of guns when no matter how many restrictions and regulations they pass, people will still find a way to shoot each other?
If we exclude low IQ nigger homicides alongside trannies, most of these school shooters/ extremists were men who were dealt a bad hand in society and bullied throughout their whole lives, and simply decided to fight back against their tyranny. Nobody ever says "maybe we should think about bullying and respecting people for who they are and not shame them for traits out of control".
Instead, there morons initiate that nerds in fact haven't been bullied enough and need to be shun back into lockers for them to be under control again, which means they only want to keep things in control.
Guns aren't evil. Their whole existence is actually opposite of that.
The purpose of gun is to secure every man and woman, no matter how small or weak they are , with the only ceiling being one's skill level, something mainly in your control. That's what normies hate. The fact that it evens the play field.
If society was just, no one would've had a reason to snap and kill with their guns, unless they were crazy.
Think about it like this:
If you give everyone a gun and nobody does anything except for few people, it means it's a minority issue of few crazies taking it upon innocents. But if you give everyone a gun, and people snap left and right, it's certainly a society problem and not a gun issue.
Restricting guns means they're afraid of opposition, because if their people truly respected them, they would've allowed guns knowing people won't harm anyone.
Last edited:
