Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Visualized: The Cost of Everyday Things in China vs. the U.S.

The Notorious SLAV

The Notorious SLAV

Foid Oppression Denial Division Commander
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2022
Posts
21,523
Online time
2d 19h
Wild how closely the price differences stick to the general 4:1 difference in post-tax average salaries. Just yesterday I've read some tweets on how differences in GDP per capita, even corrected for PPP, might not fully capture just how similar living standards of different countries might be, this makes me wonder how much truth there was to it.

1768686986550


 
Wild how closely the price differences stick to the general 4:1 difference in post-tax average salaries. Just yesterday I've read some tweets on how differences in GDP per capita, even corrected for PPP, might not fully capture just how similar living standards of different countries might be, this makes me wonder how much truth there was to it.

View attachment 1651240

thing is China has incredible Public transport so it is easier on the poor but they have a worse job market.
not sure who has it better tbh
 
I would much rather live in China if I was Chinese even if the standard of living is worse then the US
 
Everybody in the world thinks Americans are white trash and niggas
 
What about the hidden costs of an authoritarian nanny state that treats people as variables
 
The only thing i know about china is that they are number one in the world for feet they sell and make the most feet related fetish products and have a whole market dedicated soley to foot porn some chinese foot porn i watched when i was 16 changed my life.
 
Wild how closely the price differences stick to the general 4:1 difference in post-tax average salaries. Just yesterday I've read some tweets on how differences in GDP per capita, even corrected for PPP, might not fully capture just how similar living standards of different countries might be, this makes me wonder how much truth there was to it.

View attachment 1651240

China mogs US in GDP PPP
 
China mogs US in GDP PPP
Yes, in total numbers, though per capita they are about 30% of the US. That should mean that, even taking the price differences into account, the average Chinese should afford just 30% of what the average American can. But from this infographic, it more so looks like they might have just about the same amounts of purchasing power, with those things seeming to be as affordable on average in both countries, taking the salary differences into account:shock:.
 
Yes, in total numbers, though per capita they are about 30% of the US. That should mean that, even taking the price differences into account, the average Chinese should afford just 30% of what the average American can. But from this infographic, it more so looks like they might have just about the same amounts of purchasing power, with those things seeming to be as affordable on average in both countries, taking the salary differences into account:shock:.
i mean in the pic it seems that the chinese have it better or am i wrong ? Plus the american empire dying and china only keeps rising , i hope the fucking cucks in the EU find a solution to turn themselves towards china and cut ties with the us , tired af of the manchild pedo they elected.
 
Invest in China or suffer doom.

IMG 7380
GIF by Mindblowon Universe
 
China has extremely uneven development which causes socioeconomic disparities across different regions similar to Russia. The wealthy urban centers are very much comparable to developed first world countries but the rural areas are typically much worse off than their counterparts in Europe or the US.
China also has a higher GINI coefficient than the US so they're both highly susceptible to income equality. But China's work culture is absurdly difficult and taxing on their employees like all East Asian countries with their Asian work ethic. Their work culture is harsher than anything in the West which is so bad their workers sometimes commit suicide over their perpetual wageslavery which does make quality of life worse. Ironically the self proclaimed Communist state has worse worker's rights than most capitalist first world countries, they don't even allow independent unions.
China also polluted a huge proportion of its land and water resources to pull off its economic miracle and the results of that boom are questionable considering they sacrificed so much of their arable land and drinkable freshwater just to still remain in second place in GDP. What's the point of growing your country's prosperity if your nation isn't even habitable enough to live in and benefit from reaping the rewards of that prosperity?
Yes, other countries experience pollution and environmental degradation but it's usually nowhere near as bad as this. Many first world countries didn't have to destroy its natural habitats that people live in to such an extent.

 
Last edited:
China has extremely uneven development which causes socioeconomic disparities across different regions similar to Russia. The wealthy urban centers are very much comparable to developed first world countries but the rural areas are typically much worse off than their counterparts in Europe or the US.
China also has a higher GINI coefficient than the US so they're both highly susceptible to income equality.
Apparently they have a lower GINI than the US by now and are actually much closer to Italy than America when it comes to it, though they do still have a higher income ration between the top and bottom 10% for what it's worth.



the results of that boom are questionable
They really aren't. Basically everything you can think of as being a metric of wellbeing and how good life is is positively correlated with GDP per capita. There is literally no downside to economic growth, and there's a reason why basically every poor country wishes it could've done what the Chinese did.

just to still remain in second place in GDP.
Which is a position every other poor country would wish to be in. They are one of the few nonwhites who have reached Europe-like living standards and have been one of the main drivers of poverty reduction globally, there's really no way to undersell what happened in that country in the last few decades.

What's the point of growing your country's prosperity if your nation isn't even habitable enough to live in and benefit from reaping the rewards of that prosperity?
Yes, other countries experience pollution and environmental degradation but it's usually nowhere near as bad as this. Many first world countries didn't have to destroy its natural habitats that people live in to such an extent.
Pollution was a massive problem during the industrial revolution though, and in more recent times it was only mitigated in developed countries thanks to them being able to export their waste and move their more polluting infrastructure to poorer places.

This could be wrong, but apparently 20% farmland pollution is barely above world average:

View attachment 1655261

The source on water scarcity is from 2006, so I tried to find some recent stats. From what I've found, they have decent quality water, and freshwater resources comparable to the UK or Germany in per capita terms.

 
gallon of gasoline: 75% the price of china
Utilities: 4x as much

wat :worryfeels:
 
gallon of gasoline: 75% the price of china
Utilities: 4x as much

wat :worryfeels:
>You get richer so companies now charge more
>Repeat for decades:feelsbadman::feelswhat:
 
It's truly fascinating how a studio apartment in the US is 1200 MINIMUM, at least around where I live. I'd live in one of those coffin apartments in east asia if I could for cheap. I don't leave my room most of the time anyways.
 
Ching bling ling nigga
 
Apparently they have a lower GINI than the US by now and are actually much closer to Italy than America when it comes to it, though they do still have a higher income ration between the top and bottom 10% for what it's worth.




They really aren't. Basically everything you can think of as being a metric of wellbeing and how good life is is positively correlated with GDP per capita. There is literally no downside to economic growth, and there's a reason why basically every poor country wishes it could've done what the Chinese did.


Which is a position every other poor country would wish to be in. They are one of the few nonwhites who have reached Europe-like living standards and have been one of the main drivers of poverty reduction globally, there's really no way to undersell what happened in that country in the last few decades.


Pollution was a massive problem during the industrial revolution though, and in more recent times it was only mitigated in developed countries thanks to them being able to export their waste and move their more polluting infrastructure to poorer places.


This could be wrong, but apparently 20% farmland pollution is barely above world average:

View attachment 1655261

The source on water scarcity is from 2006, so I tried to find some recent stats. From what I've found, they have decent quality water, and freshwater resources comparable to the UK or Germany in per capita terms.

I think the main issue is not only water scarcity but also that combining with water resources being polluted. If China's land was less polluted I'd think they wouldn't have to purchase as much foreign farmland.
 
I think the main issue is not only water scarcity but also that combining with water resources being polluted. If China's land was less polluted I'd think they wouldn't have to purchase as much foreign farmland.
Fair point.
 
My prettiest watch is from China
 

Similar threads

The Notorious SLAV
Replies
10
Views
374
Anarcho Nihilist
Anarcho Nihilist
The Notorious SLAV
Replies
1
Views
526
CRASH THE CUCK
CRASH THE CUCK

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top