Discussion Vaginas get LONGER but NARROWER when aroused?

[Sheogorath]

@KingOfRome given that we've gone off on sort of a tangent from https://incels.is/threads/foids-wou...and-within-7-miles-of-a-subhuman-male.169110/ ... I figure this might be worth a separate thread, if you're interested.

I think maybe it's possible we are BOTH correct, but just discussing different vectors and not realizing it?

What effect does sexual arousal have on a woman’s genitals? | Women's Health

When a woman is sexually aroused, a variety of changes take place in her genitals and elsewhere on her body. Many women aren’t aware of these changes,

www.sharecare.com

The vagina expands and lengthens, too,
as the uterus is pulled upward into the body,
changing the position of the cervix.
As arousal continues, the vaginal opening tightens

The study you cited only measured one dimension: LENGTH. Ie the distance from the lips to the cervix.

So when all these muscles are tightening up, there very well could be a muscle which pulls the uterus superior up towards the heart, increasing the distance from lips to cervix. Would be curious to find out name of muscle, that sounds interesting. Do you think that would make it easier or harder to hit A-spot?

What Masters/Johnson don't seem to have measured is the dimensions other than length: ie the vaginal circumference.

That's the part I'm talking about. It's my opinion that tightness/circumference could possibly be more stimulating to a guy and cause him to finish faster, compared to fucking a hallway-vagina where he could last hours because it's so floppy and roasty.

 

[Frenchnibba]

So you are saying sex is even more enjoyable for Chads then a Normie. Suicefuel.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

So you are saying sex is even more enjoyable for Chads then a Normie. Suicefuel.

 

[lightskin2thousand0]

So you are saying sex is even more enjoyable for Chads then a Normie. Suicefuel.

over

 

[Dionysus]

damn this shit suck

 

[KingOfRome]

The vagina expands and lengthens, too,

The vagina expands

expands

 

[ThisLifeKillsMe]

It makes all those posts by soyboys saying that vaginas are only 4 inches deep pretty funny when you realise the women they fucked were totally unaroused by them. Just lol at those copers

This lol

 

[Mexicanmanletcel]

its over.... AGAIN

 

[Hate_my_life]

It makes all those posts by soyboys saying that vaginas are only 4 inches deep pretty funny when you realise the women they fucked were totally unaroused by them. Just lol at those copers

Newton IQ

 

[Total Imbecile]

You need an 8 inch dick regardless, if your dick can entirely fit in her vagina youre too small

 

[Sheogorath]

Okay well hold on now a second KOR.

Expands in what direction?

Front to back?

Side to side?

Both?

Neither?

"Expansion" could refer simply to an increase in any of the 3 planes, INCLUDING length.

Meaning they may simply have mis-spoke.

Or... maybe the inside of the vagina does get wider but the lips get tighter? In which case the net effect is that it begins to be more like an anus (tight ring then loose inside) as a foid gets aroused: weird?

The reason I question this idea is because no mechanic is explained. We're only given a mechanic for length: some kind of muscle pulls the womb upward, so the cervix moves up and the vagina is emptied of the service and reaches max length.

What muscles pull on the other 2 planes?

 

[KingOfRome]

Okay well hold on now a second KOR.

Expands in what direction?

Front to back?

Side to side?

Both?

Neither?

"Expansion" could refer simply to an increase in any of the 3 planes, INCLUDING length.

Meaning they may simply have mis-spoke.

Or... maybe the inside of the vagina does get wider but the lips get tighter? In which case the net effect is that it begins to be more like an anus (tight ring then loose inside) as a foid gets aroused: weird?

The reason I question this idea is because no mechanic is explained. We're only given a mechanic for length: some kind of muscle pulls the womb upward, so the cervix moves up and the vagina is emptied of the service and reaches max length.

What muscles pull on the other 2 planes?

Front to back, side to side, and everywhere in between. The vagina is not a box.

Like the penis, it is a cylinder, and like the penis, it increases in both length and circumference when aroused. I know this might sound unpleasant to you if you have an itty bitty boy-clit, but it's the truth. The opening, which you can see in this diagram, gets tighter to prevent slippage, which becomes a major issue with the natural lubricant secreted in an aroused state. This only means the vagina will be loose past the opening if your dick is a pathetic little pee-pee that will never satisfy a woman in its entire existence.

 

[Bane of Arthropods]

This means that only chad experiences real sex.

Ascension is literally impossible now.

 

[Sheogorath]

The vagina is not a box.
Like the penis, it is a cylinder

Thanks for the geometry lesson bro, but you do know that you can still speak of cylinders in terms of 3 planes right/

Plus, biology is rarely a perfect shape, so the faces may be ovals rather than perfect circles, in which case you're going to get an elliptic instead of right-circular:

Though obviously not to that extreme a degree, obviously A and B are going to be pretty close.

So what exactly was your basis for this 'box' bullshit where you think I'm ignoring roundness?

like the penis, it increases in both length and circumference when aroused.

Length is explained by the womb/cervix being pulled up by some mystery muscle (help me find name bro)
What explains circumference increase?
I'm not in a rush to believe something on heresay without plausible explanation first.

I know this might sound unpleasant to you if you have an itty bitty boy-clit, but it's the truth.

Now it seems like you're entering bragging mode.

Larger inner circumference might make it necessary to do a more dramatic angle to hit G-Spot but I don't know if it would matter as much as length in terms of A-Spot. In terms of just general "stroking the walls" yes...

But "stroking the walls" stimulation theory works on the bulbs > PC > cavernosa theory (cavernosa are more erogenous than bulbs... right?) and if arousal causes bulbs/cavernosa to BOTH inflate then how do you explain how despite that mutual inflation the cavern between the pairs of bulbs somehow expands?

Unless you're just talking about CAPACITY for expansion (ie can stretch more if deformed by a wide dick) inherent (it's gaping with nothing in there) expansion would have to be explained by some inherent force either pushing the walls out from within or pulling them outwards from without.

Which do YOU think happens?

The opening, which you can see in this diagram, gets tighter to prevent slippage, which becomes a major issue with the natural lubricant secreted in an aroused state. This only means the vagina will be loose past the opening if your dick is a pathetic little pee-pee that will never satisfy a woman in its entire existence.

Yeah you're definitely in brag mode, surprised you haven't posted a dick pic yet.

KOR my point is just that if the entrance is much tighter than the hall then that would be the most stimulating part, so if the most stimulating part gets more stimulating, that would mean a quicker finish than the less stimulating part getting less stimulating.

Of course, this would also bring us back to FORESKIN THEORY : the base of the shaft getting milked by the tight entrance would matter more if your foreskin was intact. The shafts of circumcised males are insensitive so they rely on tip/head sensitivity more, in which case it makes sense for the circumference of the deeper parts to matter more than the shallower parts.

 

[BodyFat10orRope]

It makes all those posts by soyboys saying that vaginas are only 4 inches deep pretty funny when you realise the women they fucked were totally unaroused by them. Just lol at those copers

 

[KingOfRome]

Thanks for the geometry lesson bro, but you do know that you can still speak of cylinders in terms of 3 planes right/

Plus, biology is rarely a perfect shape, so the faces may be ovals rather than perfect circles, in which case you're going to get an elliptic instead of right-circular:
View attachment 186040
Though obviously not to that extreme a degree, obviously A and B are going to be pretty close.

So what exactly was your basis for this 'box' bullshit where you think I'm ignoring roundness?


Length is explained by the womb/cervix being pulled up by some mystery muscle (help me find name bro)
What explains circumference increase?
I'm not in a rush to believe something on heresay without plausible explanation first.


Now it seems like you're entering bragging mode.

Larger inner circumference might make it necessary to do a more dramatic angle to hit G-Spot but I don't know if it would matter as much as length in terms of A-Spot. In terms of just general "stroking the walls" yes...

But "stroking the walls" stimulation theory works on the bulbs > PC > cavernosa theory (cavernosa are more erogenous than bulbs... right?) and if arousal causes bulbs/cavernosa to BOTH inflate then how do you explain how despite that mutual inflation the cavern between the pairs of bulbs somehow expands?

Unless you're just talking about CAPACITY for expansion (ie can stretch more if deformed by a wide dick) inherent (it's gaping with nothing in there) expansion would have to be explained by some inherent force either pushing the walls out from within or pulling them outwards from without.

Which do YOU think happens?


Yeah you're definitely in brag mode, surprised you haven't posted a dick pic yet.

KOR my point is just that if the entrance is much tighter than the hall then that would be the most stimulating part, so if the most stimulating part gets more stimulating, that would mean a quicker finish than the less stimulating part getting less stimulating.

Of course, this would also bring us back to FORESKIN THEORY : the base of the shaft getting milked by the tight entrance would matter more if your foreskin was intact. The shafts of circumcised males are insensitive so they rely on tip/head sensitivity more, in which case it makes sense for the circumference of the deeper parts to matter more than the shallower parts.

You would need a tiny, tiny penis for the opening of the vagina to fully stimulate it. Less than an inch in length. Surely, even your member is bigger than that.

Your obsession with planes is a red herring. An expansion across all three axes necessarily means an expansion everywhere in between. Perfectly circular or not, that is the case. The inside of the vagina is still tight enough to stimulate the glans of a normal-sized penis even if it's not as tight as the opening.

Please open a textbook on anatomy instead of pretending female anatomy is some metaphysical paradox. Or at least ask your mother.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

It makes all those posts by soyboys saying that vaginas are only 4 inches deep pretty funny when you realise the women they fucked were totally unaroused by them. Just lol at those copers

It doesn't say how much they "get longer," might as well be 0.1 inches or 0.5 inches at best.

 

[Sheogorath]

You would need a tiny, tiny penis for the opening of the vagina to fully stimulate it.
Less than an inch in length.
Surely, even your member is bigger than that.

Now I'm not sure if you're trying to insinuate-brag or trick me into bragging. No thanks.

Please stop trying to make this personal and trying to talk about my dick. It's way too homoerotic, and coming from me (who has gotten warnings about trap jokes) that's pretty bad.

Try "one would" rather than "you would", for example.

Now, to clarify things, you mention "full stimulation" which sounds like "every single piece of dick skin must be in contact with foid skin"

That's simply not how sex works. Even if you're using a minimal-thrusting form like CAT there's always going to be some, meaning when the base is removed it's just touching air, not foid skin. Complete contact only occurs during the endpoint when you are one is balls-deep.

So what I'm talking about is the progressive contact that the entrance has with the entire length (regardless of length) beginning with tip upon initial entrance and base upon smushing your ballsac into her FOLM.

An expansion across all three axes necessarily means an expansion everywhere in between.

Agreed, but you haven't established it happens across all three access.

The inside of the vagina is still tight enough to stimulate the glans of a normal-sized penis even if it's not as tight as the opening.

My point is that if the deep part gets progressively wider when aroused and the shallow part gets progressively narrower when aroused, the impact of the deeper parts on stimulation should diminish.

IE for example:

• unaroused entrance 10 miles wide, unaroused vagina 20 miles wide
• aroused entrance 5 miles wide, aroused vagina 30 miles wide

In that exaggerated instance, you shift from a 1:2 ratio to a 1:6 ratio.

So even though the vagina's length means it can hit more parts of the dick the further you go in, it will be to a lesser comparative factor due to the measurements moving in opposite directions compared to unaroused state.

Face it, the deeper you go, the wider it gets and the more you're fucking air:

Baseline dimensions of the human vagina

Abstract. BACKGROUND: Vaginal anatomy has been poorly studied. This study aimed to measure baseline dimensions of the undistended vagina of women of reprod

academic.oup.com

Vaginal width was largest in the proximal vagina (32.5 mm),
decreased as it passed through the pelvic diaphragm (27.8 mm)
and smallest at the introitus (26.2 mm).

The biggest stimulation (or discomfort) is going to be the entrance (INTROITUS, must remember that term!) so if it's that disparate UNaroused, how much worse does the difference get if you're actually right and the deeper-vagina gets even wider?

If, however, I am correct and the enlargening bulbs/cavernosa push inward, then the deeper-vagina would get narrower when aroused, cutting back on that difference and making the vagina more uniformly stimulating.

Please open a textbook on anatomy instead of pretending female anatomy is some metaphysical paradox. Or at least ask your mother.

Of those foids who do know their own anatomy well (a minority, they usually leave the mystery up to Chad) it will be another minority who will be honest about it.

If you know anatomy so well it should be very simple for you to explain what force pulls the vagina outward into a larger circumference.

You could well be right, I just want to know the name of this mystery force. Is it some kind of muscle? Where is it anchored?

If it's not being pulled outward, and we KNOW it isn't pushing itself outward (it's a tunnel) then if it relies on the cock to push it outward, it isn't actually widening, it's just "warmed up" and more pliable like tissues are in general when temp goes up (ie hot yoga).

It doesn't say how much they "get longer," might as well be 0.1 inches or 0.5 inches at best.

That was covered in an article that KOR cited earlier:

Typical vaginal depth in Masters and Johnson's participants ranged from 7-8 cm in an unstimulated state,
to 11-12 cm during sexual arousal with a speculum in place

So it sounds like somewhere around 4cm increase, less than 2 inches.

There was also this weird illustration:

While not mentioned in Anne's summary, it seems like the illustration implies some increase in width, which I admittedly missed earlier.

I'm probably going to need the "speculum dialeted" factor spoonfed to me to explain the left/right differences, TBH. I'm trying to be humble for you here KOR, please step in!

One thing I do notice in both cases is that it goes from more cylindricalish to more lightbulbish though. IE it seems like it supports the idea of just the deep part getting wider but not the most stimulating part (the entrance).

I did just think of one possibility explanation though...

I think we err if we think of it like a fixed wall which is widening. The aspect of getting deeper (the cervix/uterus withdrawal) is that you're exposing walls whose widths are uncharted.

So maybe it's simply a matter of the uterus/womb riding low normally obscures the widest wall of the vagina by occupying that space, and then exposes those wider walls when it withdraws?

In which case I would be right (the vagina isn't actually getting wider) but KOR would also be right (the functional width has increased).

@KingOfRome it also occurs to me that I might be shortcitedsighted in thinking of stimulation purely in terms of tightness. Texture could be another factor (I got thinking about ribbing inside onaholes) and the natural form appears to be named "vaginal rugae" if I'm guessing right. So maybe you're thinking of getting off by rubbing the head against the ribbed rugae walls to cope for lack of tightness on the head as it goes deeper?

 

[Sheogorath]

You're a literal virgin lecturing me on how sex works jfl.

You're sounding a lot like a foid/IT

Men have never had vaginas but they can still be good gynecologists.

I have told you multiple times exactly how the vagina expands and gave you a direct point of comparison for you to understand.

Your point of comparison was the penis, which makes no sense, the penis is full of chamber (cavernosum) which expand to fill with blood. That's not how a vagina works, it's how it's surrounding structures work. Women's cavernosum are on the sides not the centre.

The vagina is indeed not as tight further up as it is at the opening, but that doesn't even matter for most men because even at its widest point, it is still tight enough to sufficiently stimulate a penis of normal length and girth.

If the wider depth was 'sufficient' then the narrow shallows would be 'more than sufficient' and I still think the primary course of compression-based stimulation during thrusting.

Even short lengths could probably just enter at an angle to hit a wall instead of going straight for the cervix.

It's only a concern for men with needle dicks. If you still don't understand, consult a textbook or your mother. I don't know how I can put it more simply.

I doubt your mom put as much thought into this as I have.

 

[KingOfRome]

Women's cavernosum are on the sides not the centre.

Yes, which is why is gets looser and not tighter in the middle. The tissue becomes more lax and expands.

If the wider depth was 'sufficient' then the narrow shallows would be 'more than sufficient' and I still think the primary course of compression-based stimulation during thrusting.

As I said before, tighter isn't always better. A vagina as tight further up as it is in the opening would be likely to push a normal-sized penis out before it could climax. Only a needle dick would be able to thrust inside until climax.

I doubt your mom put as much thought into this as I have.

So much mental energy wasted on trying to convince yourself that females like being raped.

 

[Sheogorath]

Yes, which is why is gets looser and not tighter in the middle. The tissue becomes more lax and expands.

If 2 dicks are in a box (note: the box in this example is the pelvis, not the vagina... and yes I know a pelvis is not literally a rectangular prism) together and both dicks expand, there is less space left between the dicks.

If am erring perhaps it is in viewing this as parallel dicks. I need to remember they are attached together...

Perhaps what you are trying to say is that the angles of the cavernosa don't remain fixed, and it might might go from an acute angle to an obtuse angle as they go erect, basically prying anything attached to the crux/tips apart?

I know dicks can tend to curve in a direction like that, so this could actually make sense. I just needed to get the right mental picture of the physics involved.

If this is the case though, this should actually mean that the entrance is what widens, because the deep part isn't close to the crux and wouldn't widen as much.

So if it was actually a case of crux>crux distance increasing due to cavernosum erection, how does entrance remain direct in spite of that?

As I said before, tighter isn't always better.
A vagina as tight further up as it is in the opening would be likely to push a normal-sized penis out before it could climax.
Only a needle dick would be able to thrust inside until climax.

If you can push it past a tight entrance then why wouldn't you be able to keep it inside a tight passage?
Something to do with vacuum physics?
Whatever the increased resistance, it doesn't seem like anything good posture/angle/weight couldn't overcome.

So much mental energy wasted on trying to convince yourself that females like being raped.

I don't need convincing, foid glorification of mail male violence-as-assertiveness is too omnipresent to deny.

Threads like https://incels.is/threads/nsfw-the-rapepill-aka-women-want-to-be-raped-by-chad.110601/ talk about that, have you opposed that idea openly somewhere prior to this where I could review your arguments to avoid re-typing them?

It seems more like foids want to come up with explanations about how their body rejects rape (while of course, conveniently not taking it to the point of miscarrying rapes, since that could be used against them) when higher incidence of injury can simply happen as a result of higher forces, higher passion.

IE some of my best faps fucking hurt afterwards, that doesn't mean I was raped.
I'm guaranteed not to hurt myself with a half-assed fap where I can't stay interested and go limp halfway through because I'm too sleep-deprived to focus on a sex fantasy.

Some of my most enjoyable sessions of throwing roundhouse kicks out in the snow like Celibuck Norris, I get so caught up in feeling like a cool SOB that I tweak my knee and suffer afterwards. Injury just often is more prone to happening when endorphins are high and you don't know when to hold back and you're chasing the extremes of physical accomplishment.

IE foids probably get just as hurt during consensual rape-ish fucks with Chad, or RPing rape with Chad.

If they seem to on average get more hurt in the vagina by rape, that doesn't mean it's because their body is rejecting the rape (50/50 chance it is hornier for it) it could be because they're enjoying the rape and the injury is just an expected side effect of the increased tightness they get for their rapist which they can't produce enough lube to counteract.

It probably depends on the type of rape too though. Obviously if a foid is just raped while drugged/asleep you're not going to get that kind of excitement, and probably not if it's just some kind of pathetic "fuck the ugly man or he will show the sex vid of you with chad to your parents" non-masculine kind of rape. The "I might die, he's got a gun/knife on me" kind of rape also I don't think would give a horniness response (stress would be too high).

What I'm talking about are those edge situations which are basically just non/low-injury grappling/manhandling without actual threat of injury, just basically the process of getting held/wrestled and dominated. The type of body language shit which foids tend to rely on as a form of communication with chad anyway and which tends to have blurry lines with rape because of the lack of reliance on words (verbal consent). IE that "you didn't say yes or no but your body says yes" type of meme, except of course that different parts of body could send different messages (pulsating vagina vs vaguely parrying arms)

 

[KingOfRome]

Perhaps what you are trying to say is that the angles of the cavernosa don't remain fixed, and it might might go from an acute angle to an obtuse angle as they go erect, basically prying anything attached to the crux/tips apart?

I know dicks can tend to curve in a direction like that, so this could actually make sense. I just needed to get the right mental picture of the physics involved.

I know from research and personal experience (as in literal hands-on experience) that vaginas are looser past the opening. Which is why I find all this wondering and pondering to be a risible waste of time. The information is already set in stone and waiting for you to see. If you absolutely must obsess over this autistic crap instead of reading a book or hiring a prostitute to give you a guided tour, you're better off consulting a professional.

If you can push it past a tight entrance then why wouldn't you be able to keep it inside a tight passage?
Something to do with vacuum physics?

You might be able to with a huge amount of effort, but it's not efficient. Evolution clearly doesn't favor traits that make fucking harder than Dark Souls.

 

[Sheogorath]

I know from research and personal experience (as in literal hands-on experience) that vaginas are looser past the opening.

Knowing they are larger post-opening is undisputed, that is their basic form. The question is whether that form embellishes or not from arousal.

Which is why I find all this wondering and pondering to be a risible waste of time.
The information is already set in stone and waiting for you to see.

Hey feel free to show me a sonogram of a vagina becoming more bulblike in a situation we definitely know they're more aroused in.

it sounds more like you are humblebragging about fingerbanging lots of chicks and knowing that their widening vaginas meant you were arousing them and not boring them.

If you absolutely must obsess over this autistic crap instead of reading a book or hiring a prostitute to give you a guided tour, you're better off consulting a professional.

Why exactly do you think a prostitute would be a good means of gauging how foids respond when aroused?

Your approach presupposes you are actually arousing them.

You're basically assuming a premise/conclusion

• 1) "I know that foid vaginas expand when they are aroused"
• 2) "I know I am arousing this foid"
• 3) "Oh look, vaginas expanded ... THEORY PROVEN"

Meanwhile, if they exactually expand when relaxed/bored, maybe they're just faking excitement and not aroused, and you're proving the exact opposite?

You might be able to with a huge amount of effort, but it's not efficient. Evolution clearly doesn't favor traits that make fucking harder than Dark Souls.

The more effort, the more compression, the more stimulation. IE why guys complain about onaholes getting loose and taking forever to work or never working because of it.

Just how much resistance do you think a foid vagina can give?

and furthermore: if rape was so fucking uncomfortable to do then why would people still do it?

In b4 "it's not about sex it's about power" feminism theory, where the rapist cries out in pain as he strikes you

 

[azakhan]

Another day, another dickpill and another reason to rope.

 

[Sheogorath]

Another day, another dickpill and another reason to rope.

I'm not sure if this thread is actually meant to be a dickpill. If vaginas get longer in response to arousal then shouldn't that actually help unattractive guys with small dicks hit this "A-spot" someone told me to go look at a couple days ago?

Unless of course the A-spot is only erogenous when already aroused in which case hitting it doesn't work unless it's moved further away.

But... does the A-spot actually move away?

What if it remains in the same spot and is blocked by the presence of the uterus/cervix and only arousal lifting it out of the way allows access to it?

@KingOfRome probably knows, being a master at pleasing women who is here talking to us virtuously rejecting legions of foids begging for his skills for our benefit.

 

[KingOfRome]

The question is whether that form embellishes or not from arousal.

It's not a question. It is proven fact. Read a book or consult a professional.

Hey feel free to show me a sonogram of a vagina becoming more bulblike in a situation we definitely know they're more aroused in.

You're just going to dismiss it by finding some reason to claim there might not be arousal even if I put in the effort to find one.

Meanwhile, if they exactually expand when relaxed/bored,

They don't. That is stupid.

and furthermore: if rape was so fucking uncomfortable to do then why would people still do it?

The rapist can use exogenous lubrication, take advantage of a female's intoxicated state (or immaturity in the case of statutory rape), or fuck the dry hole anyway because they're sadistic and get off on the female's suffering.

 

[Deleted member 20659]

This makes me SICK

 

[azakhan]

I'm not sure if this thread is actually meant to be a dickpill. If vaginas get longer in response to arousal then shouldn't that actually help unattractive guys with small dicks hit this "A-spot" someone told me to go look at a couple days ago?

Unless of course the A-spot is only erogenous when already aroused in which case hitting it doesn't work unless it's moved further away.

But... does the A-spot actually move away?

What if it remains in the same spot and is blocked by the presence of the uterus/cervix and only arousal lifting it out of the way allows access to it?

@KingOfRome probably knows, being a master at pleasing women who is here talking to us virtuously rejecting legions of foids begging for his skills for our benefit.

Idk bro all I know is that foid would laugh at my little penis.

 

[thebuddhacel]

Each post from this guy is a book. He literally loves to cope in incels.co.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

You need an 8 inch dick regardless, if your dick can entirely fit in her vagina youre too small

Vaginas can expand lengthwise like an accordion to like 12 inches... [It's So Fucking Over], even BBCs are babydick to them...

 

[Sheogorath]

Idk bro all I know is that foid would laugh at my little penis.

That's good for you: if she is not aroused then per KOR-theory her vagina will be super-tight so your penis will feel huge for her.

Each post from this guy is a book. He literally loves to cope in incels.co.

I post like this about a lot of subjects that have nothing to do with sex, I'm just a rambler.

My actual cope right now is watching cartoons about high school foids.

 

[thebuddhacel]

I post like this about a lot of subjects that have nothing to do with sex, I'm just a rambler.

Thats cool, not gonna lie

 

[Haywire]

Vaginas can expand lengthwise like an accordion to like 12 inches... [It's So Fucking Over], even BBCs are babydick to them...

i have never seen that number before you saying they can take a full 12 inch dildo or dick?????

 

[Sheogorath]

i have never seen that number before you saying they can take a full 12 inch dildo or dick?????

Some of them, though I don't think all, and not sure what %

I don't know if 'an accordion' is necessarily the right metaphor though...

I'm beginning to think that maybe a better way to look at this is that vaginas are ALWAYS super-long like that, but "at rest" ~50% of that deeper length is occupied by the womb (uterus) and the tube (cervix) leading into it, and it only SEEMS to get longer because some muscle pulls the womb/uterus upward out of the vagina, emptying it and allowing it to reach it's full size.

I'm glad I've been reviewing this because I used to think of the cervix as just some 2D door and not actually a 3D tunnel connecting 2 rooms...

Although i guess since one room sits inside the other room, it's more like a tunnel that leads into a room that's in side a larger tunnel.

 

[bait____]

its over.... AGAIN

 

[Gymcelled]

So you are saying sex is even more enjoyable for Chads then a Normie. Suicefuel.

Chad can make her vagina tighten. Even if his cock isn't anything special it's going to feel tighter.

I remember there was a 3/10 ugly, drug addict mess of a girl in hs, she was the only girl who talked to me back then (inb4 chad smiley).

She said this one guy she finds hot always made her feel fuller and made her cum in minutes but he was completely average down there. She even said she once fucked an ugly guy (probably means average) who had a big dick, she said it was perfect and yet she couldn't cum, she said he lasted the longest by far but they "didn't click".

 

[Sheogorath]

@bait____ why do you think it's over?

Unless the cervix/womb itself is an erogenous zone (some manga suggest that, but I don't know of any real-world evidence) having it pulled up out of the way isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Apparently smashing into the cervix forcefully can be painful for foids, so while you might not please the masochists (that's like what, somewhere between fourteen to eight-eight percent of them? Probably can't get reliable stats there) you might have an advantage when fucking women who don't like pain if it meant that prior to her arousal you were smashing her service. If she IS a masochist then you'd just have to fuck her unaroused, which is probably what she would want anyway.

I think the question here is: is the "A-spot" (assuming it exists) mobile or not? If it gets pulled up too then yeah, if your dick isn't 12 inches long then you're out of luck hitting it, I guess?

But if it's not mobile, then the cervix/uterus getting pulled out of the way should make it easier to hit, I would think. It's supposed to be the anterior wall of the vagina adjacent to the cervix so I wouldn't think it would get pulled up and away with the cervix/womb.

She said this one guy she finds hot
always made her feel fuller
and made her cum in minutes
but he was completely average down there.

She even said she once fucked an ugly guy (probably means average) who had a big dick,
she said it was perfect and yet she couldn't cum,
she said he lasted the longest by far but they "didn't click".

More anecdotal support of my theory, thanks GC

 

[HumanTrash]

Why you care about foids pleasure points? Cuck

 

[Sheogorath]

Why you care about foids pleasure points? Cuck

Because if I ever do get access to fucking one, I guess I'd want her to let me do it again?

Hell, even if I only cared about fucking her once and moving on, having them enjoy the experience and wanting to repeat it is probably a good way to avoid a false rape accusation, or having her go Lorena Gallo on your cock because you didn't make her cum.

Also even if I never have sex (which seems progressively likely) it leads to more interesting fap fantasies. Even when I occasionally dabble in rape fantasy I usually prefer to imagine her deriving pleasure from it, and it's easier to concoct a believable/convincing fantasy if I can convince myself that I might plausibly be able to create that reaction despite my lack of good looks, than to assume I have some magic polymorph potion to become chad, or that she has some kind of horseface fetish.

 

[HumanTrash]

Because if I ever do get access to fucking one, I guess I'd want her to let me do it again?

Hell, even if I only cared about fucking her once and moving on, having them enjoy the experience and wanting to repeat it is probably a good way to avoid a false rape accusation, or having her go Lorena Gallo on your cock because you didn't make her cum.

I doubt it will help when your sex becomes a mechanical feat of autism designed to perfectly hit every spot of her vagina from lips to cervix, instead of being a natural act

 

[bait____]

@bait____ why do you think it's over?

Unless the cervix/womb itself is an erogenous zone (some manga suggest that, but I don't know of any real-world evidence) having it pulled up out of the way isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Apparently smashing into the cervix forcefully can be painful for foids, so while you might not please the masochists (that's like what, somewhere between fourteen to eight-eight percent of them? Probably can't get reliable stats there) you might have an advantage when fucking women who don't like pain if it meant that prior to her arousal you were smashing her service. If she IS a masochist then you'd just have to fuck her unaroused, which is probably what she would want anyway.

I think the question here is: is the "A-spot" (assuming it exists) mobile or not? If it gets pulled up too then yeah, if your dick isn't 12 inches long then you're out of luck hitting it, I guess?

But if it's not mobile, then the cervix/uterus getting pulled out of the way should make it easier to hit, I would think. It's supposed to be the anterior wall of the vagina adjacent to the cervix so I wouldn't think it would get pulled up and away with the cervix/womb.

Lifefuel knowing that my penis can give pleasure to plenty of women but Suicidefuel because that is not happening anytime soon

 

[WawelDragon1683]

I don't know. I never had sex.

 

[Bakura806]

what differences does it make its not like any of us are going to see one IRL.

 

[Sheogorath]

I doubt it will help when your sex becomes a mechanical feat of autism designed to perfectly hit every spot of her vagina from lips to cervix, instead of being a natural act

Why would you be trying to hit every part instead of just the important ones?

If I got in a foid I think I would try out some version of CAT since it's less stimulating for a guy and more stimulating for a girl. That would let me get used to the feeling and not nut immediately.

what differences does it make its not like any of us are going to see one IRL.

Foids do slum from time to time *shrug*

Maybe at least the fatcels/mentalcels/locationcels have a chance.

 

[Iwanttolive]

So in general, the brand of the car is more important than actual efficiency.

 

[Bane of Arthropods]

I don't know. I never had sex.

 

[FinnCel]

So you are saying sex is even more enjoyable for Chads then a Normie. Suicefuel.

Damn that's brutal

 

[Sheogorath]

So in general, the brand of the car is more important than actual efficiency.

Off-brand cars basically have anvils chained to them

 

[truthpill]

Chad only ngl

 

[Sheogorath]

The internal dialogue of Satsuki Satonaka in Z-Ton's Mesudachi ("Boyish Girl Friend") also supports my theory, she is under the misconception that Chad's dick is somehow growing inside her, when actually she is just aroused by his raping her, so it's actually her pussy tightening around him (getting narrower) giving the illusion of dick growth.

Not accepting this trope and imagining that Chad's dick feels narrower because vaginas inexplicably expand is COPE.