Ugly women can get laid whenever they want. Men cant. There are equal numbers of men and women. How does that pan out?

[BiggieTall]

So if there are roughly equal numbers of men to women and men will bone anything but women even the fat ugly ones are picky. Then how does it work out who goes without? Do the better men just get laid more and the worse men less? Last time I checked no chad was doing a fat girl. But I suppose the fat girl is doing a 7/10 guy but I don't think many 7/10 guys are getting around town.

How does this work?

It seems like women are4 always getting laid but men don't which makes no sense at all if there are equal numbers of men and women about

 

[acnescarcel]

no ones going to have stats on who fucks fat chicks because no one admits to it

 

[BiggieTall]

no ones going to have stats on who fucks fat chicks because no one admits to it

LOL

Maybe its age, maybe its because there are "twice" as many men relatively speaking because men age slower than women and men don't like old women (women age faster weaker skin), but men are so horny I would have thought age is like a fat woman ie theyd still be doing them

 

[Hunter]

chads share foids. chads are also a big part of the problem. they are our enemy.

 

[BiggieTall]

chads share foids. chads are also a big part of the problem. they are our enemy.

chads get through a load of the best women, the highest ranking men have it the best they just go from hot woman to hot woman all the time that's the benefit of being alpha but that's an exceptionally rare guy that does that.

I think alpha males are even more powerful than prime alpha females, because all women are wired to want the top guy.

I don't think alpha men are the problem because they are so rare and they can only get through so many women

 

[StormlitAqua]

>It seems like women are4 always getting laid but men don't which makes no sense at all if there are equal numbers of men and women about

Have you heard of Pareto's Principle? 80% of the effects are caused by 20% of the problem, or applicable to this case: 80% of the women are fucking 20% of the men.

This is because feminism and modern western leftism has brainwashed our society. They have convinced our men that women deserve complete freedom and should have no childrearing duty, and have also convinced the men themselves that fatherhood isn't important. They have convinced the women that they should have said freedom, and that sluttery and sleeping around is justified.

What this has done is skewed the sexual marketplace, because our biology and society have not caught up with the (((brainwashing))). Women's value in the marketplace has skyrocketed exponentially, while mans' has steadily declined. Women no longer need men anymore, because they have been given undeserved freedoms and no longer have interest in childbearing. Women hold all the cards nowadays, socially speaking. Back in the good-ol'-days, women needed men, and our society was better because of it. We allowed only men to make decisions and hold certain titles and offices, because they are the only qualified people to do it. Men were the only ones allowed to work because women could not be trusted to be faithful and chaste if they were allowed outside the home. These things no longer exist, and our society still gives women the "helpless" halo even though they are allowed to do anything a man can.

When I refer to biology in the paragraph above, I refer to the notion that women are the selector sex. Biologically speaking, a woman should be careful who she has sex with, as she may end up carrying a kid for 9 months and then raising it for 18 more. Men don't have such a "recharge" time and can usually have another go after a few hours. This is the biological basis for the argument of the 80/20 rule. Women only have sex with the highest tier of men because they are literally bioligaclly programmed to do so. Men will fuck anything due to having a low "recharge" time, compiled with much higher testosterone levels. Additionally, women release oxytocin during sex, which attaches her to her partner, meaning that she is going to want a genetically fit man to be with.

 

[Angry_runt]

Remember that grannies, cougars and BBWs are all genres in porn. Just because you don't see Chad banging fatties doesn't mean he doesn't do it.

 

[Hunter]

chads get through a load of the best women, the highest ranking men have it the best they just go from hot woman to hot woman all the time that's the benefit of being alpha but that's an exceptionally rare guy that does that.

I think alpha males are even more powerful than prime alpha females, because all women are wired to want the top guy.

I don't think alpha men are the problem because they are so rare and they can only get through so many women

by alpha men you mean chads? because chads arent that rare, they are the top 10%

 

[BiggieTall]

>It seems like women are4 always getting laid but men don't which makes no sense at all if there are equal numbers of men and women about

Have you heard of Pareto's Principle? 80% of the effects are caused by 20% of the problem, or applicable to this case: 80% of the women are fucking 20% of the men.

This is because feminism and modern western leftism has brainwashed our society. They have convinced our men that women deserve complete freedom and should have no childrearing duty, and have also convinced the men themselves that fatherhood isn't important. They have convinced the women that they should have said freedom, and that sluttery and sleeping around is justified.

What this has done is skewed the sexual marketplace, because our biology and society have not caught up with the (((brainwashing))). Women's value in the marketplace has skyrocketed exponentially, while mans' has steadily declined. Women no longer need men anymore, because they have been given undeserved freedoms and no longer have interest in childbearing. Women hold all the cards nowadays, socially speaking. Back in the good-ol'-days, women needed men, and our society was better because of it. We allowed only men to make decisions and hold certain titles and offices, because they are the only qualified people to do it. Men were the only ones allowed to work because women could not be trusted to be faithful and chaste if they were allowed outside the home. These things no longer exist, and our society still gives women the "helpless" halo even though they are allowed to do anything a man can.

When I refer to biology in the paragraph above, I refer to the notion that women are the selector sex. Biologically speaking, a woman should be careful who she has sex with, as she may end up carrying a kid for 9 months and then raising it for 18 more. Men don't have such a "recharge" time and can usually have another go after a few hours. This is the biological basis for the argument of the 80/20 rule. Women only have sex with the highest tier of men because they are literally bioligaclly programmed to do so. Men will fuck anything due to having a low "recharge" time, compiled with much higher testosterone levels. Additionally, women release oxytocin during sex, which attaches her to her partner, meaning that she is going to want a genetically fit man to be with.

so you think the top 20% of men do nearly all the women and the women just share the 20% of men and take turns on them? That's not what I see I see lots of longer lasting relationships where infidelity isn't that common (or rare)

I don't see the top 20% of men rolling in pussy, maybe the top 5% are but they can only get around so much

 

[Life Wasted]

80/20 rule, basically harems form, Chad's keep a set of bitches on a rotation as do chadlites. Normies manage to keep a single girl. Everyone else is just shit out of luck. For someone to win someone has to lose, we are in the latter camp.

 

[BiggieTall]

80/20 rule, basically harems form, Chad's keep a set of bitches on a rotation as do chadlites. Normies manage to keep a single girl. Everyone else is just shit out of luck. For someone to win someone has to lose, we are in the latter camp.

(CHADS 10% of men) Get 30% of the best women

(CHADITES 20% of men) Chadites get say 30% of the women but lesser women, they get same % as chads but only because theya re more numerous not because they are as good or getting as much sex

(NORMIES 40% of men) Normies get 30% for same reason they are less attractive but more of them

(INCELS 30% of men) Below normal get 10% of the women

 

[StormlitAqua]

so you think the top 20% of men do nearly all the women and the women just share the 20% of men and take turns on them?

Absolutely. Women LOVE this, it is their ideal. Women want men who are wanted by other women, as these men have great genetics. There can only be so many men in the top 20%, so they just share them. Thanks to the brainwashing I described in my previous post, women do not value chastity or monogamy anymore, so they just all coordinate their efforts to raise their social value by all sharing the upper echelon of men. That's just another way that the female SMV is so inflated.

That's not what I see I see lots of longer lasting relationships where infidelity isn't that common (or rare)

Most relationships have infidelity, whether it goes unnoticed, unreported, or even ignored (JFL at these cucks). The only relationships where you don;t see infidelity is where the woman is virgin before marriage and/or is completely chained to the home by the much wiser husband.

I don't see the top 20% of men rolling in pussy, maybe the top 5% are but they can only get around so much

IDK where your looking then man. I know a guy IRL who is top 20% (and would be top 5% if he was taller) and has almost a triple-digit n-count. Maybe female SMV has gotten so inflated that now they only sleep with top 5%? Depends on where you live too. If you live like in Toronto or London or Southern California, then yeah I could see there being huge issues. But I live in the midwest and we have at least a little retention of the better days of old.

 

[BlackOpsIIcel]

 

[BiggieTall]

(CHADS 10% of men) Get 30% of the best women

(CHADITES 20% of men) Chadites get say 30% of the women but lesser women, they get same % as chads but only because theya re more numerous not because they are as good or getting as much sex

(NORMIES 40% of men) Normies get 30% for same reason they are less attractive but more of them between them

(INCELS 30% of men) Below normal get 10% of the women between them

IS THIS ABOUT RIGHT?

 

[Deleted member 10234]

(CHADS 10% of men) Get 30% of the best women

(CHADITES 20% of men) Chadites get say 30% of the women but lesser women, they get same % as chads but only because theya re more numerous not because they are as good or getting as much sex

(NORMIES 40% of men) Normies get 30% for same reason they are less attractive but more of them between them

(INCELS 30% of men) Below normal get 10% of the women between them

IS THIS ABOUT RIGHT?

No, it's more like this:

Chad top 0.5% of men 8/10 or higher: Get top 50% of women (Realistically all women lust after Chad, and womens attractiveness is a standard Gaussian curve but Chad will only fuck top 50% of women aka 5/10+ or higher)
Upper tier normies 20% of men 7/10: Get next 30% of women i..e 3/10 4/10 5/10
Normies 4-6/10: 60% of men get Next 20% of women 1/10 2/10
Incels (Bottom 19.5%) get NOTHING

 

[Flabcel Repulsive]

>It seems like women are4 always getting laid but men don't which makes no sense at all if there are equal numbers of men and women about

Have you heard of Pareto's Principle? 80% of the effects are caused by 20% of the problem, or applicable to this case: 80% of the women are fucking 20% of the men.

This is because feminism and modern western leftism has brainwashed our society. They have convinced our men that women deserve complete freedom and should have no childrearing duty, and have also convinced the men themselves that fatherhood isn't important. They have convinced the women that they should have said freedom, and that sluttery and sleeping around is justified.

What this has done is skewed the sexual marketplace, because our biology and society have not caught up with the (((brainwashing))). Women's value in the marketplace has skyrocketed exponentially, while mans' has steadily declined.

Yes, indeed. To be honest, the skewed sexual marketplace wasn't part of the original plan. The presumption was that everyone would be able to screw around equally as much (see, for instance: Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse, and guys like that). Then there was a glitch in the system that no one, neither on the left nor on the right, had expected: biology, or more precisely, female hypergamous behaviour.

In principle there are two ways to deal with the 80/20 rule: Either you can re-establish some kind of patriarchy and a sexually repressive system. Jihadicels and those permanently lamenting "the degeneracy" on this board would likely wish to take that route no matter what (people who detest the idea of sexual utopia as such), or, you could equalize attraction by any means necessary, potentially involving measures affecting both genders. Outlandish examples of such would be the re-wiring female attraction neurology, mandatory re-engineering of all male bodies to reach Chad criteria, perfecting male-to-female trannymaxx conversion etc.