Courtesy of Grok:
No, there's no solid scientific evidence that chowing down on raw meat and raw milk specifically during puberty would have meaningfully upgraded your adult height, jawline, or overall "looks" in a way that overrides genetics. It's a popular meme in certain online circles (raw primal/carnivore influencers, Weston Price fans, etc.), but the data doesn't back it up as a game-changer—especially not enough to turn an "Asian manlet" into something else. Let's break it down honestly with what the research actually shows.
Nutrition During Puberty Matters... But Not "Raw" vs. Cooked
Puberty is a key window for linear growth (height), bone density, muscle, and some facial development because of hormones like growth hormone, IGF-1, and testosterone. Protein, calories, calcium, vitamin D, zinc, and other nutrients help you hit your genetic ceiling.
- Milk (raw or not) has a modest link to growth: Studies on kids/adolescents show higher dairy intake correlates with slightly taller adult height—maybe 0.4 cm per daily cup in some cohorts, thanks to protein, calcium, and IGF-1. But this is from any milk; the effect is small and mostly helps prevent stunting in undernourished populations. Meta-analyses of RCTs find no big difference in height from milk interventions overall.
- Raw milk isn't proven superior: Old 1930s studies hinted at raw being better for weight/height in some kids, but modern reviews (including direct comparisons) show pasteurization doesn't meaningfully hurt protein digestibility, nutrient absorption, or growth outcomes. The "enzymes" or "probiotics" claims don't hold up for development. Any IGF-1 boost comes from the dairy proteins/fats, not the raw state.
- Raw meat? Even less evidence: No controlled studies show raw meat outperforms cooked for puberty growth, testosterone, or facial structure. High-protein animal foods (cooked or not) support muscle and hormones via cholesterol, zinc, etc., but "raw primal" claims are mostly anecdotal. Carnivore-style diets might give short-term metabolic perks in some people, but nothing unique to raw for looks or height.
Weston Price's famous work (1930s) gets cited a lot here—he showed traditional nutrient-dense diets (including raw dairy in some cultures, organ meats, etc.) led to broader faces, straight teeth, and better bone structure vs. modern processed junk. But the key was
overall nutrient density (vitamins A, D, K2 from animal foods + minerals), not "must be raw." Cooked meats and fermented dairy featured heavily too. Modern replications emphasize avoiding ultra-processed food over raw vs. cooked.
Height and "Asian Manlet" Reality: Genetics Dominate
Adult height is ~80% genetic. Nutrition in childhood/puberty can help you
reach your potential (e.g., South Koreans got taller with better post-war diets/protein), but it won't add inches beyond your DNA ceiling. East Asian populations have specific genetic variants influencing height averages—historical nutrition played a role, but ethnic differences persist even in well-fed groups.
If your parents/grandparents were on a typical mid-20th-century Asian diet (rice-heavy, variable protein), optimized nutrition might have gotten you a bit taller/stronger—but swapping to raw steak and raw milk wouldn't have been the magic variable. Plenty of short Asian guys crush it in looks/fitness/confidence without that diet.
The Risks Outweigh the Hype
Raw milk and raw meat are straight-up risky, especially for kids/teens:
- Bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria, Campylobacter—common in unpasteurized milk and undercooked/raw meat. Kids/adolescents get hit hardest (higher hospitalization rates, kidney issues, sepsis). Outbreaks are well-documented.
- No health org (CDC, AAP, FDA) recommends it for growing bodies. The "anabolic" meme ignores that foodborne illness can stunt growth via inflammation/malnutrition.
Bottom Line for Your "What If"
You probably wouldn't look dramatically different as an adult. A solid, nutrient-dense diet (plenty of protein, dairy/eggs, veggies, etc.—cooked is fine and safer) during puberty helps maximize what your genes allow. But "significantly improve your looks" to the point of not being an "ugly Asian manlet"? That's mostly cope from meme accounts. Facial structure, height, and baseline attractiveness are heavily genetic + early environment. Raw didn't create supermodels in traditional societies; consistent good nutrition did.
At this point, focus on what you
can control now: lifting weights (builds muscle/jaw aesthetics via testosterone response), sleep, grooming, style, posture, and confidence. Tons of guys who don't fit the tall/chiseled stereotype do just fine. The diet meme is fun for TikTok but not a time machine.