
Castaway
Time is a flat circle
★★
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2024
- Posts
- 4,603
A middle ground between traditional state nationalism and pan-European nationalism.
Could be interesting
Could be interesting
I think a European alliance where nations cooperate and provide mutual aid while still remaining sovereign seems good
Okay GrAYUtterly meaningless. Do you think a woman's cunt respects national or ethnic borders?
JoinedJan 29, 2025Utterly meaningless. Do you think a woman's cunt respects national or ethnic borders?
Utterly meaningless. Do you think a woman's cunt respects national or ethnic borders?
Basically what I had in mind, the idea of pan-nationalism would be more in a spiritual metaphorical sense igI think a European alliance where nations cooperate and provide mutual aid while still remaining sovereign seems good
Kind of like what I said above, as to how for some groups it might not work due to history but for some it would workCould maybe work if the inter-group relations for some of those were properly sorted out and improved.
Life could be a dreamCould be interesting
NoEngland should be part of the celtics. Most English people are mixed with the native celtic britons. All areas of GB have basically the same culture with minor differences.
NoBrittany should be part of the pan-latins in my opinion aswell.
Explain?No
No
A man can dream. But the chances of something like this becoming actual reality is far. Very far from ever happening. Sadly.Interesting concept, I've always been sort of on the fence
I think that firstly, certain issues would need to be resolved, but this can perhaps resolve that in and of itself.
Ideally, they would act more as "confederations" of sorts for upholding homogeneity, cultural values, and some economic ties & movement between each individual country/region.
În Imperium it is suggested that some sort of "Pan-European" empire(in a metaphorical sense) needs to be established in order to preserve the "high culture" which Europe cultivated.
It could also exist as a temporary movement of sorts in order to try and solve the current conflict with Russia & Europe, immigration issues, etc.
For some groups it might be harder, since Slavs for instance likely don't want to be under some Russian-led State again; so perhaps some of these would have to be subdivided.
I think for Germanics, Scandinavians, and Celts it could work more easier though.
Basically what I had in mind, the idea of pan-nationalism would be more in a spiritual metaphorical sense ig
Kind of like what I said above, as to how for some groups it might not work due to history but for some it would work
For Celts, it probably would as they all have a history of being subjugated by larger nations(England, Spain, France, etc)
Life could be a dream
Remove richfags ofc
Exactly.For some groups it might be harder, since Slavs for instance likely don't want to be under some Russian-led State again; so perhaps some of these would have to be subdivided.
I think maybe something such as Yugoslavia would be best in a way: In a sense, there's a Balkan one, West one, etc.Exactly.
I think a European alliance where nations cooperate and provide mutual aid while still remaining sovereign seems good
I could see this either working really well or falling apart immediately with infighting. It all depends on the politicians and how power hungry they are. I could see inner riveralries form up. For example. The Italian-Spanish rivalry where both former states try to get control over the center government. Same with the Celtic nation. I think the country with the best shot is the one who actually got those same borders at some point. Germany.I think maybe something such as Yugoslavia would be best in a way: In a sense, there's a Balkan one, West one, etc.
But overall, it does seem a bit tricky in that regard.
For Germanics, Scandinavians, and Celts I think it would easily work
Pan-Italic/Latini/"Med" or whatever could work for just Italy+Iberia I'd say
There's more nuance to it than just this.
Yeah, basically. Obviously the West one would be the easiest to set up and the most stable of courseI think maybe something such as Yugoslavia would be best in a way: In a sense, there's a Balkan one, West one, etc.
Interesting, I didn't know that some of those divisions are still so strong.Ireland struggles with sectarian Christian divisions, Spain has the Basques and Catalans wanting to fuck off, Russia has antagonized itself to almost every other Slavic country, the Austrians and Swiss have no interest anymore in being part of Germany, the rest of Scandinavia if anything is skeptical of Sweden due to its migrant crime gangs spilling over into them.
Would've worked in the 1800s. Too late now
Who said anything about women having a say?Utterly meaningless. Do you think a woman's cunt respects national or ethnic borders?
Russia cannot lead the Slavic world, as it has turned all Slavs against itself. Even Poland or the Czech Republic have more rights to gather other Slavic countries around them. Most Slavs deservedly hate Russia. Poland hates Russia for the tsarist occupation, then the Soviet occupation. The Czech Republic hates Russia for suppressing the Prague Spring. Ukrainians hate Russia for the Holodomor and the war.View attachment 1377237
A middle ground between traditional state nationalism and pan-European nationalism.