Experiment Thought experiment: What would the dating market look like if every man ascended to 7/10+ via freak plastic surgery?

[soul contre tous]

I had a general thought experiment the other day where i asked myself the question:

"Are the mating requirements of toilets an inflexible threshold that needs to be passed to be considered attractive or do foids choose the most attactive ~5-20% regardless of the average male attractiveness in their environment?"

The first option (the looks threshold theory) would indeed lead to a better looking, arguably healthier society and a fairer sexual market in the long term, if hard looksmaxxing was made to be safer, cheaper, more accessible and less stigmatized to the point of everyone being able to do it.

The second option (juggernaut law of female dating requirements) would lead to a fisherian runaway with exaggerated, impractical ornaments (giant chins, no facial fat, gigantic height, extremely deep set eyes for example) that could lead to detrimental health problems or even extinction as it was the case for many species in the past.

So i started a poll with the hypothetical question:
"If everyone was 7/10+ , would holes still share the most attractive 5-20% rather than equally distribute mating opportunities?"

 

[I respect women]

 

[LesscoBlob]

I had a general thought experiment the other day where i asked myself the question:

"Are the mating requirements of toilets an inflexible threshold that needs to be passed to be considered attractive or do foids choose the most attactive ~5-20% regardless of the average male attractiveness in their environment?"

The first option (the looks threshold theory) would indeed lead to a better looking, arguably healthier society and a fairer sexual market in the long term, if hard looksmaxxing was made to be safer, cheaper, more accessible and less stigmatized to the point of everyone being able to do it.

The second option (juggernaut law of female dating requirements) would lead to a fisherian runaway with exaggerated, impractical ornaments (giant chins, no facial fat, gigantic height, extremely deep set eyes for example) that could lead to detrimental health problems or even extinction as it was the case for many species in the past.

So i started a poll with the hypothetical question:
"If everyone was 7/10+ , would holes still share the most attractive 5-20% rather than equally distribute mating opportunities?"

Women would still only want the top 20% of men. Average height today was top 20% 100 years ago.

 

[BlackCel_from_ZA]

I had a general thought experiment the other day where i asked myself the question:

"Are the mating requirements of toilets an inflexible threshold that needs to be passed to be considered attractive or do foids choose the most attactive ~5-20% regardless of the average male attractiveness in their environment?"

The first option (the looks threshold theory) would indeed lead to a better looking, arguably healthier society and a fairer sexual market in the long term, if hard looksmaxxing was made to be safer, cheaper, more accessible and less stigmatized to the point of everyone being able to do it.

The second option (juggernaut law of female dating requirements) would lead to a fisherian runaway with exaggerated, impractical ornaments (giant chins, no facial fat, gigantic height, extremely deep set eyes for example) that could lead to detrimental health problems or even extinction as it was the case for many species in the past.

So i started a poll with the hypothetical question:
"If everyone was 7/10+ , would holes still share the most attractive 5-20% rather than equally distribute mating opportunities?"

It's easy 7/10 male would become the new incel.

 

[soul contre tous]

It's easy 7/10 male would become the new incel.

incels in 2050 be like:

 

[meta-cel(celcel)]

incels in 2050 be like:

this is unrealistic.
each of those extra-chad needs a penis so they can get quintuple penetrated by quad-chad.

 

[Murder Mario]

It would be more equally distributed as foids would be more likely to “settle” with a man who is average or below average since she wouldn’t be “disgusted” by him.

Which is something people need to understand. When foids say “why can’t I find a nice guy”, they don’t necessarily mean pure Chad, they’re saying “decent looking man who I’m not DISGUSTED by.”