... because they're cucks. Some of them literally. You can envy chads, though. At least they can have casual sex at will. But let's add some details here.
Every non-chad has to cope with what's called "male disposability". In terms of biology the male body is less valuable than the female body because of respective reproductive systems. If you have 10 males and 1 female, within a year there's a single baby. If you have 10 females and 1 male, within a year there are 10 babies. That's assuming in both scenarios every male has sex with every female and everyone's fertile. Hence the societal notion that women need to be protected. Because were something bad happen to them, the loss of reproductive potential is bigger. But that's evolutionary psychology 101.
So, if a man doesn't possess superior genetics which would make him extremely desirable to a woman (chad), he needs to "bring something extra" to compensate for the fact that there's excess sperm in the world. There are basically four ways to do this.
1. Jestermaxxing. The term sort of implies joke telling. But it could be anything. Could be excessive complimenting. Anything to entertain the woman and anything to show positive attitude towards her. There are two reasons why this is problematic:
a) It's one sided. The man, not the woman, jokes and compliments. The woman remains passive and decides whether to accept the joke and the compliment;
b) It could be prolonged and ultimately futile. The man does this for months even in some cases, yet the romantic relationship is never formed.
I did not include the aspect of personal humiliation, because it's somewhat subjective. The man can perform immense acts of jestermaxxing yet claim he feels this is honorable, And, technically speaking, there's no way to disprove him, because that's his personal feeling. It is humiliating, though. But only incels seem to be able to admit this,
2. Betabuxxing. The man gives resources to the woman. The problem is, in many cases the woman doesn't need the money. Not the kind of money that an ordinary man can provide. Majority of men cannot afford to buy exotic travels or designer clothes. And simple everyday things the woman can get herself.
3. Dumpsterdiving. The man forgoes his standards and expectations for the woman to a great extent in terms of:
a) Beauty. We have seen plenty of couples where the man is somewhat short but like 5/10 in terms of facial aesthetics but the woman is morbidly obese and 2/10. She is much, much uglier than him. And her ugliness is self-inflicted by eating too much, while there's nothing a man can do about his height;
b) Chastity. Men prefer chase women, ideally virgins. That's because of parental certainty. If the woman has a tendency to sleep with lots of men, the man cannot be sure the baby is his. There's also a statistical proof that the more lifetime sexual partners the woman has had, the more likely she is to divorce. It has to do with diminished ability to pair bond. She might have a lasting imprint from her previous partners. This means, she might masturbate while dreaming about a man she slept with 10 years ago. And here I will call upon what I have coined The Bulbasaur's Law (very creative): when an average man dates and average woman, her partner count is at least three times higher than his.
4. Literal Cuckoldry. The woman cheats on the man. He might genuinely be unaware. Or he might suspect something but pretend he doesn't in fears that he will lose her. Or it might be "an open relationship". The woman only agrees to be with the man if she can have sex with other men. He is not enough. Literally.
Normies go through this. Not a thing to envy.
Every non-chad has to cope with what's called "male disposability". In terms of biology the male body is less valuable than the female body because of respective reproductive systems. If you have 10 males and 1 female, within a year there's a single baby. If you have 10 females and 1 male, within a year there are 10 babies. That's assuming in both scenarios every male has sex with every female and everyone's fertile. Hence the societal notion that women need to be protected. Because were something bad happen to them, the loss of reproductive potential is bigger. But that's evolutionary psychology 101.
So, if a man doesn't possess superior genetics which would make him extremely desirable to a woman (chad), he needs to "bring something extra" to compensate for the fact that there's excess sperm in the world. There are basically four ways to do this.
1. Jestermaxxing. The term sort of implies joke telling. But it could be anything. Could be excessive complimenting. Anything to entertain the woman and anything to show positive attitude towards her. There are two reasons why this is problematic:
a) It's one sided. The man, not the woman, jokes and compliments. The woman remains passive and decides whether to accept the joke and the compliment;
b) It could be prolonged and ultimately futile. The man does this for months even in some cases, yet the romantic relationship is never formed.
I did not include the aspect of personal humiliation, because it's somewhat subjective. The man can perform immense acts of jestermaxxing yet claim he feels this is honorable, And, technically speaking, there's no way to disprove him, because that's his personal feeling. It is humiliating, though. But only incels seem to be able to admit this,
2. Betabuxxing. The man gives resources to the woman. The problem is, in many cases the woman doesn't need the money. Not the kind of money that an ordinary man can provide. Majority of men cannot afford to buy exotic travels or designer clothes. And simple everyday things the woman can get herself.
3. Dumpsterdiving. The man forgoes his standards and expectations for the woman to a great extent in terms of:
a) Beauty. We have seen plenty of couples where the man is somewhat short but like 5/10 in terms of facial aesthetics but the woman is morbidly obese and 2/10. She is much, much uglier than him. And her ugliness is self-inflicted by eating too much, while there's nothing a man can do about his height;
b) Chastity. Men prefer chase women, ideally virgins. That's because of parental certainty. If the woman has a tendency to sleep with lots of men, the man cannot be sure the baby is his. There's also a statistical proof that the more lifetime sexual partners the woman has had, the more likely she is to divorce. It has to do with diminished ability to pair bond. She might have a lasting imprint from her previous partners. This means, she might masturbate while dreaming about a man she slept with 10 years ago. And here I will call upon what I have coined The Bulbasaur's Law (very creative): when an average man dates and average woman, her partner count is at least three times higher than his.
4. Literal Cuckoldry. The woman cheats on the man. He might genuinely be unaware. Or he might suspect something but pretend he doesn't in fears that he will lose her. Or it might be "an open relationship". The woman only agrees to be with the man if she can have sex with other men. He is not enough. Literally.
Normies go through this. Not a thing to envy.
