View: https://youtu.be/ipExUNk5cyQ?si=mFa-b-ef2EgoaVao
If you think it's bad now, it's only getting worse.
View: https://youtu.be/ipExUNk5cyQ?si=mFa-b-ef2EgoaVao
If you think it's bad now, it's only getting worse.
the good news is
i just coomed to foot shit
and now i have to take a shower
a smile from the gecko shall be your reward
i mean this is all water wet once you get 4.5 and the historical significance of it
societies have always operated like this
even in the 1600s women had legal superiority everywhere and countries like england were called the paradise of women
also women were never kept from working or going to school
thats another meme
if you look at the actual history, most women were full time employed
and when they werent, it was because woment didnt want to work not men
the 50s stay at home wife shit was literally started by 1800s feminists who didnt want to work in industrial revoultion factories
70% of women were full time employed then and they didnt want to work. people that have studied foid diaries from that time period admit this.
Thats why women became stay at home moms and female employment dropped to like 6% in 1900, not because of traditionalism or some shit
but because foids didnt want to work
then 2-3 generations later, they claimed they had been kept from working for 1000s of years and now was their turn
meanwhile their grand-grandmoms were literally fighting to get out of being wageslaves
its all a meme guys, this entire reality is such a fucking meme
what is happening now is just a repeat of what i just described
foids take what they can get, and the foid-worship, onlyfans etc... is just a return to what "tradiationalism" was in the 50s - you feed a useless freeloading whore who is essentially a glorified NEET, you break your back, she does nothing and still cheats on you
If people understood this they would realize how ironic it is that dudes shit on onlyfans
OnlyFans is literally just a continuation of the trad-wife stay at home mom lifestyle, its the same shit
its men worshiping foids, surrendering all their resources and time etc...
the only issue men have with it is that they want to worship the foids on their own terms
watch this video for a bit more context
Communism For Two
Originally posted to YouTube - 24th of January 2019 --------- Family Values Politicians --------- New York Time - Ohio Lawmaker Who Backed Family Values Resigns Over 'Inappropriate Behavior' https://www.nyti
www.mgtow.tv
brutal blackpill video but kinda watER this thing is already know
Water is wet, but yeah.
Send me more good foot shitthe good news is
i just coomed to foot shit
and now i have to take a shower
a smile from the gecko shall be your reward
Absolutely true. The foids 200 years ago worked harder than most people today.
Thanks brocel. If you have anymore stuff I can watch or read link it. I have too much time on my hands.watch this video for a bit more context
Communism For Two
Originally posted to YouTube - 24th of January 2019 --------- Family Values Politicians --------- New York Time - Ohio Lawmaker Who Backed Family Values Resigns Over 'Inappropriate Behavior' https://www.nyti
Send me more good foot shit
Footjob Stamina Exam
Watch Footjob Stamina Exam on Pornhub.com, the best hardcore porn site. Pornhub is home to the widest selection of free Big Dick sex videos full of the hottest pornstars. If you're craving kink XXX movies you'll find them here.
Gorgeous beauty Elena Ross gave me a great footjob for the holiday
Watch Gorgeous beauty Elena Ross gave me a great footjob for the holiday on Pornhub.com, the best hardcore porn site. Pornhub is home to the widest selection of free Big Dick sex videos full of the hottest pornstars. If you're craving hd porn XXX movies you'll find them here.
read this. all cited with sources at bottom.
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
greenpill.net
also my threads here for more sources:
sewers thread where i found that women in 1800s owned 1000s of businesses in england, and they only looked at two cities for this investigation:
In this one they looked at diaries of foids and found that they overwhelmingly wanted to LEAVE the workforce, not stay in it:
EARLY FEMINISTS WANTED WOMEN TO WORK LESS - NOT MORE -> REPLY OR U GAY
"The desire to free oneself from work was common to all classes and both sexes. Dr Joanna Bourke of Birkbeck College, London, has studied the diaries of 5,000 women who lived between 1860 and 1930. During that period, the proportion of women in paid employment dropped from 75 per cent to 10...
incels.is
videos where everything is sourced and cited:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPtxyvb29P0
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQpC_5Ha7Ng
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOGTyeTY810
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54ikkqDtdwY
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdqkuLiaR7c
Everything I linked you right now completely destroys any concept of
1. women being historically oppressed
2. women not being allowed to work in the past
3. wifes being abused in the past (opposite is true, wifes got away with abusing husbands)
4. women not being allowed to get education in past
Work was not an option back then, everyone had to work.
Tradcopers and redpillers like to make this argument "back in the day work was hard, so foids had to stay at home."
But anyone who knows countryside knows that foids have always worked in hard labor.
Like doing harvest, ploughing fields and shit.
You dont need muscle strength to plow a field with an ox or horse.
Women have always worked alongside men.
Everyone was poor, so working was not an option.
When you view modernity through that lens, you realize times are not getting worse at all, its just more of the same old shit.
Nobody wants to work, women seize the opportunity to live off male labor, like they did in the past.
And men freely surrender the fruits of their labor, just like they did in the past.
The theme has changed, the framework has not.
Shit like OnlyFans is literally just a version of the 50s stay at home wife.
But instead of paying her for being in a sexless marriage with you while she fucks chad, you are now paying for her to fuck chad while she does not give you sex. I don't see the difference.
Last edited:
read this. all cited with sources at bottom.
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
also my threads here for more sources:
sewers thread where i found that women in 1800s owned 1000s of businesses in england, and they only looked at two cities for this investigation:
In this one they looked at diaries of foids and found that they overwhelmingly wanted to LEAVE the workforce, not stay in it:
EARLY FEMINISTS WANTED WOMEN TO WORK LESS - NOT MORE -> REPLY OR U GAY
"The desire to free oneself from work was common to all classes and both sexes. Dr Joanna Bourke of Birkbeck College, London, has studied the diaries of 5,000 women who lived between 1860 and 1930. During that period, the proportion of women in paid employment dropped from 75 per cent to 10...
videos where everything is sourced and cited:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPtxyvb29P0
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQpC_5Ha7Ng
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOGTyeTY810
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54ikkqDtdwY
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdqkuLiaR7c
Everything I linked you right now completely destroys any concept of
1. women being historically oppressed
2. women not being allowed to work in the past
3. wifes being abused in the past (opposite is true, wifes got away with abusing husbands)
4. women not being allowed to get education in past
Work was not an option back then, everyone had to work.
Tradcopers and redpillers like to make this argument "back in the day work was hard, so foids had to stay at home."
But anyone who knows countryside knows that foids have always worked in hard labor.
Like doing harvest, ploughing fields and shit.
You dont need muscle strength to plow a field with an ox or horse.
Women have always worked alongside men.
Everyone was poor, so working was not an option.
When you view modernity through that lens, you realize times are not getting worse at all, its just more of the same old shit.
Nobody wants to work, women seize the opportunity to live off male labor, like they did in the past.
And men freely surrender the fruits of their labor, just like they did in the past.
The theme has changed, the framework has not.
Shit like OnlyFans is literally just a version of the 50s stay at home wife.
But instead of paying her for being in a sexless marriage with you while she fucks chad, you are now paying for her to fuck chad while she does not give you sex. I don't see the difference.
i shared some below in other reply, you can check out. im not talking out of my ass
I’ll save
@Mortis
@Orzmund
if you check my links, its all sourced with citations at bottom. Like the greenpill website, it has everything cited.
the youtube videos I linked, the guy puts all the citations and links in description or pinned comment under video
its all cited and sourced, dont worry
I dont feel like making thread about this shit because even on this site there are so many fucking retarded tradcopers, like the only other person that gets this shit on deep level is @WorthlessSlavicShit as far as I can tell
ive said it on here a 1000 times, when you think about the mechanism behind gender roles, what makes people treat each other in specific predicatable way......... think guys.... its looks. its just fucking looks
if i looked like a 16 year old JB, people would treat me like one, even if i was 2000 years old and from the nigger dimension
look this up please, there are people that have a genetic disorder where they look like children and they pass as real kids
people have adopted these little fuckers, thinking they are real kids
So, if this is true and gender is just looks based and shit, then why the fuck would society be any different in the past?
It wouldnt right?
Women look neotenous, child-like and thats why they get preferrential treatment.
Just like puppies, kittens, babies, anime foids etc...
people forgive kids for being narcissitic because oh so cute they are kids
guess who else gets away with that behavior. yeah niggas they are called grown ass women
The reason why women are held less accountable and have all these priviliges is the same reason why people dont care if their puppy shits on the rug. Cute = innocent = no responsiblity.
Women also do everything in their power to further enhance this effect by looking as neotenous as possible.
Female hypoagency vs male hyper agency. We have known this for year yet retards still cant 1+1 together
Again, if this is true, why would societies operate different in the past
Did people hate babies, puppies, kittens and nice artwork in the past?
Did people in the past hate beauty?
This retarded.
Guys, laws are build to deal with human nature, they dont create it.
Socities, civilizations and legislature is build around governing whats already there -> human nature, including shit like lookism, gender dynamics et...
All societies are roughly the same, its only that the virtue signalling changes, but the underlying behavior does not.
For instance, retarded people like to think the victorians were prudish people because they read the virtue signaling from media back then.
Thats like someone reading femminsit articles from our time and thinking thats how people lived (which they will do in future trust me).
In reality victorian england had a RETARD amount of prostitutes, 100s of 1000s
they were smoking it up with crack cuz the british empire was occupying afghanistan, which to this day is the largest opium exporter on earth
they bombarded china with drugs
they had sex dens where people would smoke it up and have their dick sucked through a gloryhole
i am not shitting
there is pornographic photos from vitorian age
they had giga high aboriton rate (around 20%+ according to some)
it was a clusterfuck and these people were never prudish ever
look up Priss Fotheringham
she was a celbrity prostitute who would do handstands in public and people would drop coins and wine into her pussy
bro every english city had a road called "gropecunt lane" google it. Thats where you would go to fuck whores
Or look up "guide to the whores of london" - london was the worlds largest city for a long time. Shit was like bankog now, people would go there for sex tourism and ppl would sell them guides on how to do it - literally like the movie hangover but in 1700s and 1600s
The more you study what societies are actually like, the more you realize nothing changes, literally nothing fucking changes. People are degenerate as fuck, our ancestors had a sex drive, yes, no shit, people put everything in every hole they have and dudes will fuck anything that moves, nothing has changed.
@Orzmund
if you check my links, its all sourced with citations at bottom. Like the greenpill website, it has everything cited.
the youtube videos I linked, the guy puts all the citations and links in description or pinned comment under video
its all cited and sourced, dont worry
I dont feel like making thread about this shit because even on this site there are so many fucking retarded tradcopers, like the only other person that gets this shit on deep level is @WorthlessSlavicShit as far as I can tell
ive said it on here a 1000 times, when you think about the mechanism behind gender roles, what makes people treat each other in specific predicatable way......... think guys.... its looks. its just fucking looks
if i looked like a 16 year old JB, people would treat me like one, even if i was 2000 years old and from the nigger dimension
look this up please, there are people that have a genetic disorder where they look like children and they pass as real kids
people have adopted these little fuckers, thinking they are real kids
So, if this is true and gender is just looks based and shit, then why the fuck would society be any different in the past?
It wouldnt right?
Women look neotenous, child-like and thats why they get preferrential treatment.
Just like puppies, kittens, babies, anime foids etc...
people forgive kids for being narcissitic because oh so cute they are kids
guess who else gets away with that behavior. yeah niggas they are called grown ass women
The reason why women are held less accountable and have all these priviliges is the same reason why people dont care if their puppy shits on the rug. Cute = innocent = no responsiblity.
Women also do everything in their power to further enhance this effect by looking as neotenous as possible.
Female hypoagency vs male hyper agency. We have known this for year yet retards still cant 1+1 together
Again, if this is true, why would societies operate different in the past
Did people hate babies, puppies, kittens and nice artwork in the past?
Did people in the past hate beauty?
This retarded.
Guys, laws are build to deal with human nature, they dont create it.
Socities, civilizations and legislature is build around governing whats already there -> human nature, including shit like lookism, gender dynamics et...
All societies are roughly the same, its only that the virtue signalling changes, but the underlying behavior does not.
For instance, retarded people like to think the victorians were prudish people because they read the virtue signaling from media back then.
Thats like someone reading femminsit articles from our time and thinking thats how people lived (which they will do in future trust me).
In reality victorian england had a RETARD amount of prostitutes, 100s of 1000s
they were smoking it up with crack cuz the british empire was occupying afghanistan, which to this day is the largest opium exporter on earth
they bombarded china with drugs
they had sex dens where people would smoke it up and have their dick sucked through a gloryhole
i am not shitting
there is pornographic photos from vitorian age
they had giga high aboriton rate (around 20%+ according to some)
it was a clusterfuck and these people were never prudish ever
look up Priss Fotheringham
she was a celbrity prostitute who would do handstands in public and people would drop coins and wine into her pussy
bro every english city had a road called "gropecunt lane" google it. Thats where you would go to fuck whores
Or look up "guide to the whores of london" - london was the worlds largest city for a long time. Shit was like bankog now, people would go there for sex tourism and ppl would sell them guides on how to do it - literally like the movie hangover but in 1700s and 1600s
The more you study what societies are actually like, the more you realize nothing changes, literally nothing fucking changes. People are degenerate as fuck, our ancestors had a sex drive, yes, no shit, people put everything in every hole they have and dudes will fuck anything that moves, nothing has changed.
you do it, im sick of this shit honestly.
either you or @Mortis
you can make this thread, i dont have the energy for this shit anymore
its all out there, its been out there for decades. mgtow, mra etc... have pointed this shit out since the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s
its just that because of the 4.5 female ingroup and men constantly infighting and making more and more splinter groups, there is no heritage of knowledge.
everyone just throws the baby out with the bathwater
all the info I just gave you I got from MRA and mgtow type dudes
dudes that everyone on here would shit one because like 1% of what they believe is whack (they mostly just dont get lookism and alpha fucks beta bux, but everything else about these ppl is solid and researched).
the channel i linked, shield for men, everything is cited and reserached
go on the mra subreddit "feminst historical revisionism debunked" thread or whatever its called
its all sourced too
you can process all this data if you want, i told that to @WorthlessSlavicShit too, i just dont have the energy anymore and a lot of people on this forum seem completely incapable of processing what i just told you: That the past is the same as the present.
Or aka, door 3, instead of
door 1: the past shit y'all
door 2: the past perfect y'all
how about shit was the same? do ppl really think human nature did a 180 in 200 years?
you think your gggggg-grandpa did not fap to his onetitis? she probably was some fat tiddied farm bitch
my grandma has openly admited to being a hoe and she was born in fucking 1935 or some shit
condoms were invented in 1800s too, people dont get this either
another thread worth reading, but nobody here reads so yeah:
[JBpill] Teen and pre-teen prostitutes were common in New York during the 1800s
The book is City of Eros: New York City, Prostitution, and the Commercialization of Sex, 1790-1920 by Timothy Gilfoyle. You can find it on LibGen. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Gilfoyle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Genesis Chapter 3: "The Whorearchy", the best JBpill chapter...
incels.is
talks about how teenage girls in 1800s would run away from rich families, get fucked, play whore
and then come back
no consequences
it was common
sound familar?
nothing changes guys. humans were not saints in the past.
look hysteria and massages
basically doctors would fingerbang foids to point of orgasm as a treatment
this was widespread and considered normal for centuries
they even invented motorized dildos cuz doctors fingers got tired
some made so much money they specialized on it
so prude, these victorians, oh my
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeI1-UnLNg8
Female hysteria - Wikipedia
"It is no longer recognized by medical authorities as a medical disorder. Its diagnosis and treatment were routine for hundreds of years in Western Europe.[1]"
"Hysteria" and the Strange History of Vibrators
The invention of the vibrator had nothing to do with women's pleasure.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-CcnAzt0ZI
there are people disputing this is true however.
It does not make a difference.
tehre is so much shit out there guys
heres another one
foids in the middle ages and later used to apply pasted drugs on their pussy to get high
they called this "witch flights" just like we clall it "getting high"
A study in Renaissance psychotropic plant ointments - PubMed
Various historical sources from the Renaissance--including transcripts of trials for witchcraft, writings on demonology and textbooks of pharmaceutical botany--describe vegetal ointments prepared by women accused of witchcraft and endowed with marked psychoactive properties. Here, we examine the...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Can confirm. Even when I was in school, I frequently saw foids working in construction. Now with consoomerism in full effect in third worlds as well, I see foids work useless jobs like fake-up artist, receptionist (entitled cunts), in fast-food restaurants and whatnot.
yes same here
and if you look at the stats we have from 1700s and 1800s, most women worked physical labor
so that entire fucking cope of "life was dangerous and work was hard, so women stayed home and were homemakers, and guys took care of them"
is compelte hogwash, compelte trash and redpill cope
that shit never existed
Holy fucking shit...
yes exactly, the virtue signalling changes, the behaviors remain
for instance, here is a funnyone
ancient romans larped that big dicks were unvirtous
does anyone believe that?
does anyone really think that roman women were obsessed with micropenisses because their culture pretened big dicks were ew?
another thing and my final word for now
you can go back and find countless examples from every century in recorded history
of guys complaining about women, marriage, how women are lying all the time, etc...
ive seen shit from the 1300s
from ancient greece
one time i found an archive of phamphlets from england from like 1400s-1600s, it was like their social media
i found a bunch listing all the shit women do, how they lie, how you cant trust them
literally like written version of blackpill video but from like 1600s
for one example you can easily reserach look up "the arraingment of lewd women" from early 1600s
nigga exposes foids, gets tons of flak for it
how is it possible that people have the same views we have, even though these people lived in muh trad society where you could just feed your wife a knuckle sandwhich and fuck her in the ass?
its easy: Because that didnt happen. Men were actually punished for punising their wifes -> one paper you can find is called "skimmington revisited"
also men patently refuse to hurt women, just like most humans refuse to hurt babies and puppies and so on. cuz they are cute and trigger some protective instinct in humans
again, if its looks, why would they want to hurt women in past?
thats like saying beautiful paintings were ragefuel for medieval peasants
it makes no sense
you can go back and find countless examples from every century in recorded history
of guys complaining about women, marriage, how women are lying all the time, etc...
ive seen shit from the 1300s
from ancient greece
one time i found an archive of phamphlets from england from like 1400s-1600s, it was like their social media
i found a bunch listing all the shit women do, how they lie, how you cant trust them
literally like written version of blackpill video but from like 1600s
for one example you can easily reserach look up "the arraingment of lewd women" from early 1600s
nigga exposes foids, gets tons of flak for it
how is it possible that people have the same views we have, even though these people lived in muh trad society where you could just feed your wife a knuckle sandwhich and fuck her in the ass?
its easy: Because that didnt happen. Men were actually punished for punising their wifes -> one paper you can find is called "skimmington revisited"
also men patently refuse to hurt women, just like most humans refuse to hurt babies and puppies and so on. cuz they are cute and trigger some protective instinct in humans
again, if its looks, why would they want to hurt women in past?
thats like saying beautiful paintings were ragefuel for medieval peasants
it makes no sense
started watching earlier today will finish later
Those are some of my very most favourite threads on this site tbh. I wish I could force-feed the tradcucks here this shit until they somehow finally see the truthsewers thread where i found that women in 1800s owned 1000s of businesses in england, and they only looked at two cities for this investigation:
In this one they looked at diaries of foids and found that they overwhelmingly wanted to LEAVE the workforce, not stay in it:
EARLY FEMINISTS WANTED WOMEN TO WORK LESS - NOT MORE -> REPLY OR U GAY
"The desire to free oneself from work was common to all classes and both sexes. Dr Joanna Bourke of Birkbeck College, London, has studied the diaries of 5,000 women who lived between 1860 and 1930. During that period, the proportion of women in paid employment dropped from 75 per cent to 10...
.Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
