>Richard Hanania
Not even a millisecond
Not even a millisecond
Soy "this is one that a lot of "incel" guys could really stand to read"
dnr
This needs to be pinned. Very high IQ post 
It's especially annoying since in her case, it's not just her spewing the typical bluepilled stuff we've heard a million times, but what she is saying is actively contradicting what she's saying in 90% of her article. Literally almost all of what she writes is pure blackpill. Average and below average men are fucked, their looksmatches/statusmatches implicitly don't exist, all women see themselves as worthy of the top 20% men at the very least and would rather be alone than with a man who's nowhere near the top, etc. Throughout the entire article she makes it perfectly clear that it is female hypergamic mate choice, and only female hypergamy, that is the reason for this state of affairs, but then in the very last few paragraphs she turns it around to "give men hope" in that patronizing sort of way where she says that actually men are the real reason for why we aren't wanted to Chad-only women (tautology, I know), and that if we only do XYZ then we will be Chads and women will want us after we correct our mistakes which are making us the bottom 80% of men they don't want
.
To be honest that's a good attitude, imo. It's best to just ignore crazy leftie people.
Foids only want equality when it benefits them
View attachment 1414072
DOGE is About Sex
Or am I just constantly thinking about sex? Many such cases.www.cartoonshateher.com
All right, since this guy (on the right) is telling me I could stand to read this:
View: https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1887277279858073932#m
I decided, why not, and hoo boy, did I have no idea what I was signing up for
Right off the bat, this chick fully confirms the way this forum talks about women, and thinks she's owning us
So, right off the bat, full acknowledgment of the blackpill? Nice. So, average men don't have th cards, but average women do? So an agreement that inceldom is a male-only problem, and fem"cels" don't exist? Good.
Yup, we know that. Women are only attracted to top men, men are attracted to all women. Blackpill 101
Bullshit and we've known that for years,
Study showing: (1) Women lie tremendously about the importance of looks, and (2) It is Looks > Personality > Money for both genders
This study looked at how important each gender rated: Physical Attractiveness, Personality, and Earning Power in a relationship. Then they studied to what degree these traits actually led to success in speed dating. Speed dating is the fairest model to allow personality or earning power to...
Thoughts on the "It's Looks > Personality > Money for both genders, women just lie more about it" study on incels.wiki?
Title. I've seen some threads and comments recently on the order of importance of those things, if and when personality actually comes into play, so I thought of just asking about your thoughts on this...
but let's see how long will she hold this claim.
Literally one paragraph later, the "mental chemistry is where women have high standards" is gone
Jfl at the language and the way she cloaks it. "a world where dull, doughy, lower to middle-income men are hot commodities for all women
Oh, wait. I almost used logic and tried explaining a woman's thought process while thinking like a man. Notice, at the beginning, it was "Average Men Don't Have The Cards." If you've been asking how about average women, well, here it is. According to themselves, women can never be average, or below-average. How could they be? After all, all of them are certain that they deserve the top Chads they pine after. According to women themselves, all women themselves, they are always "top" and "above-average", being average or below-average is a male-only thing that no woman can ever be, and so if a woman can't get the top 20% Chad, regardless of her own status or looks, it is better to stay single than to "settle" for a bottom 80% man, because all of them KNOW for certain that no matter what, they are better than 80% of men
Once again, Blackpill 101, thanks for agreeing with us
Yes, just as I've written above, thanks for agreeing with us.
Jfl at the tired "women never worked before" cope, we've seen that one destroyed so many times it's not even funny at this point
Well, that was just about the only really interesting part about this, the rest is some US culture war-brainrotted mumbo-jumbo irrelevant to anyone not in the author's social circles (muh "AI is more likely to take men's jobs away than women's, take that inkwells") but there are some good parts which just further show you how the author and women in general, really, see the world:
First off, that's the very first time I see that TikTok, and I wouldn't be surprised if the same is true for most of the guys here.
Second off, jfl at the mental/word games the author is doing here. If men had a "perplexingly reverse-SJW attitude toward women in the workplace" and saw as "part of an oppressor class, who has for some reason been granted unfair degrees of privilege in the form of being hired for fun, pretend jobs" then surely there would be much better examples of that then people getting mad at a TikTok of women who, by absolutely any measure, are in fact very highly privileged showing it off
Just like at the beginning where the author spoke of "average" and "lower-income" men, but only spoke of "all women", the author seems to be erasing the existence of women other than high-earners
Once again, no acknowledgement of women also being in those positions, and those women rejecting men on their level. Once again, in her mind, being below-average is something that's male-only.
Yes, and? Those guys are just as annoying, but they seem to be disproportionately less likely to flaunt their privilege on the internet filled with less fortunate people. Also, jfl at her suddenly admitting that certain income position (aka being rich) suddenly has to be noted to be something both genders are in, when nowhere in that entire screed are low income or below-average women acknowledged in any way
More or less. Emphasis on the less. Though given what I've written above I guess I put myself in a tough spot if I wanted to debate this
Are they generally those women? I can imagine that a lot of feminists from the Global South would contest that, though if you are too solipsistic to think of or understand anything outside of your social circles, this would be the case for you.
Once again, do bottom-half women even exist in this person's worldview? Not a single word in this bullshit seems to even imply that the author seems them as a possibility.
Huh? Richfags are richfags, no matter what. Again, just because you are painfully solipsistic doesn't mean that the world works the way your social circles do. When, in the entirety of history really, have male and female richfags been hated differently by the people they are exploiting? As a working-class non-American, I don't really see much of a difference between any of the people talked about in that article
What exactly about it makes zero sense to a normal person? Normal, working people have disliked richfags regardless of gender for the entirety of history.
Yes, I could tell, your inability to understand any other social environment was a dead giveaway, as is your very skewed idea of a "normal person".
And if they weren't overrepresented among the people who make TikTok rage baits, then their male counterparts very much would be the ones receiving hundreds of times more hate. We know that social class makes almost zero difference for how warmly people feel about men, but does scale for women, with basically all men being as disliked as the bottom 10% of women while women just get more and more liked as their social status rises.
Study - We have anti male issues not race issues
Intersectional implicit bias: Evidence for asymmetrically compounding bias and the predominance of target gender Abstract: Little is known about implicit evaluations of complex, multiply categorizable social targets. Across five studies (N = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of...
Jfl at all the shit this chick wrote only to default to "Duh, well, improooov yourself inkwell." Yeah, all the manlets, autists, disableds, ethnics, poorfags and others on forums like this
Men ARE self-improving. Men ARE doing their best to be their best. At this point, over 30% of men who date online are using steroids and more of them have bulimia to control their weight than women. It still doesn't do shit.
36.4% of US male online daters are now resorting to anabolic steroids & bulimia to compete - Scientific Blackpill
Again. Again and again and again, it seems that for this person, it is only men who can even BE average. "Middling salary", by definition, is more than a lot of women themselves earn, but even the poorest and lowest skilled woman should be entitled to high-earning Chad, because women are above income or any other hierarchies, all women are Stacies and entitled only to the best.
Kek
Once again, thanks for the blackpill, your blabbering was getting too boring. Tradcucks blabbering about "muh women want providers" are on suicide watch right now.
Though it's very funny that she shits on betabuxxing, and yet, throughout the entirety of this article she was bringing up low or average-earners as examples of men women are right to not be attracted to
Yeah, those tradcucks probably don't. We do though and we know exactly what it is women want, we just don't like being gaslit and lied to over it.
Eh, there's more nuance to that. Income and looks are correlated, good-looking people earn more and we know that, and social class and status are both strongly heritable and there's really not that much intergenerational mobility globally apart from a few very rich countries, but that's just me being pedantic.
Lots of us do, just look at any escortcel debate on here.
"Hehe, go have sex with men inkwell.
Jfl. This chick just can't save herself from spewing blackpills. Yes, women are never going to be providers for men. Despite the flaunted "wage gap" being just a couple percentage points once corrected for positions, experience and so on, as we all know, there are almost no househusbands or stay-at-home fathers. Despite objectively minimal differences in earnings, whenever one spouse supports and provides for the other, it is a man providing for his wife or girlfriend. Women see even attractive men as replaceable, and would never agree to providing for anything below that, while men have been happy providing for and supporting just about all women for centuries, even though, as I've mentioned, women have perfectly been able to work and support themselves and their families for most, if not all of history.
Bullshit.
Ah, the moral panic about people being lonely because of "muh phones" or other bullshit. Props to @GeckoBus for pointing out how bullshit of a notion that actually is in one of my threads recently.
Social media has no effect on real-life interactions, study - Scientific Inquirer
Since the invention of the telegram, the adoption of new technologies, such as television, smartphones and social media, has often led to fears of the decline of face-to-face interactions and the potential of decreased happiness. Now, researchers at the University of Missouri and the University...scientificinquirer.com
[JFL] "Adolescence" already has three glowing reviews in The Guardian praising it to high heavens
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: A TV show is saying the same bullshit I do, therefore it's awesome:soy::foidSoy::soy::foidSoy:. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/mar/13/adolescence-review-the-closest-thing-to-tv-perfection-in-decades "the closest thing to TV perfection in...
Once again, bottom 50% of women don't exist.
"Just talk to people, just put the phone down, just don't watch porn"
I'm not even going to react to this endlessly-recycled bullshit at the end. "Just put yourself out there to be humiliated bro. Just work out, put the phone down and stop watching porn for some reason, so maybe, one day, you can attract your looksmatch who never had to do any of that, and is in fact an obese, phone-addicted gooner, and she will graciously settle for you." Always, always they just recycle this bullshit
@based_meme @DarkStar @Regenerator @Mecoja @Stupid Clown @Sewer Sloth @Sergeant Kelly @Flagellum_Dei @To koniec @reveries @NIGGER BOJANGLES @veryrare @LeFrenchCel @PersonalityChad @OutcompetedByRoomba @GeckoBus @Lazyandtalentless @weaselbomber @ItsovERfucks @Grodd @anandkoala @Epedaphic @Wumbus @The Judge @Biowaste Removal @KING VON
Women are fucked in a few years anyway, so why do these guys act all high and mighty tht nothing ever happens. Lmao they all said this when they thought jooo Kamala will be elected. Do not challenge the powers you give to nobody men that vote
And slowly tht window is closing
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
