Blackpill Study - We have anti male issues not race issues

[Eventy]

Intersectional implicit bias: Evidence for asymmetrically compounding bias and the predominance of target gender​

Abstract:​

Little is known about implicit evaluations of complex, multiply categorizable social targets. Across five studies (N = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of targets varying in race, gender, social class, and age. Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was pro-women/anti-men bias, followed by smaller but nonetheless consistent pro-upper-class/anti-lower-class biases. By contrast, we observed less consistent effects of targets' race, no effects of targets' age, and no consistent interactions between target-level categories. An integrative data analysis highlighted a number of moderating factors, but a stable pro-women/anti-men and pro-upper-class/anti-lower-class bias across demographic groups. Overall, these results suggest that implicit biases compound across multiple categories asymmetrically, with a dominant category (here, gender) largely driving evaluations, and ancillary categories (here, social class and race) exerting relatively smaller additional effects. We discuss potential implications of this work for understanding how implicit biases operate in real-world social settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Society shows more preference, trustworthy, and competence for females while males are detested. Little is shown on race.

It’s a water thread but its nice to see a scientific article about it.

Intersectional implicit bias: Evidence for asymmetrically compounding bias and the predominance of target gender - PubMed

Little is known about implicit evaluations of complex, multiply categorizable social targets. Across five studies (<i>N</i> = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of targets varying in race, gender, social class, and age. Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Emba]

OK nigger...

 

[GeckoBus]

Intersectional implicit bias: Evidence for asymmetrically compounding bias and the predominance of target gender​

Abstract:​

Society shows more preference, trustworthy, and competence for females while males are detested. Little is shown on race.

It’s a water thread but its nice to see a scientific article about it.

Intersectional implicit bias: Evidence for asymmetrically compounding bias and the predominance of target gender - PubMed

Little is known about implicit evaluations of complex, multiply categorizable social targets. Across five studies (<i>N</i> = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of targets varying in race, gender, social class, and age. Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

very good find
@WorthlessSlavicShit

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

very good find
@WorthlessSlavicShit

A very good find indeed, I'll definitely read every word ASAP.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

 

[Mathayus7]

Great post nigga bookmarked!

 

[GeckoBus]

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

View attachment 1238356

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

View attachment 1238391
View attachment 1238388

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

bumping for giga iq
water wet shit, the only things that have positive impact is being female and attractivenss. Social class is probably related to gender and looks lets be honest here jfl.
If you are a high status woman, you could nuke a major city and still play the victim.

 

[DarkStar]

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

View attachment 1238356

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

View attachment 1238391
View attachment 1238388

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

Will check out later, thanks brocel

 

[Sloth Vs Kanga]

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

View attachment 1238356

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

View attachment 1238391
View attachment 1238388

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

More evidence of JBW(woman)

 

[decafincel]

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

View attachment 1238356

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

View attachment 1238391
View attachment 1238388

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

Christ

 

[Stupid Clown]

Great read. Bookmarked. Can't say I'm surprised.

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

View attachment 1238356

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

View attachment 1238391
View attachment 1238388

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

And yet somehow they're oppressed ! What a joke.

 

[reveries]

I've just gone through most of that, you guys really could've showed more of it, it's brutal and hilarious at once.

The text really undersells how dominant across those studies gender seems to be, at least in one of those five studies the researchers did, socioeconomic status only came into play for women, while all men were rated equally shittily just because they were men, and thus were equal to the poorest women.

View attachment 1238356

In another study, race bias completely disappeared after attractiveness and some personaliteehee traits were brought into the equation.

View attachment 1238391
View attachment 1238388

Jfl at, in the first model, attractiveness being almost 8 times as influential as extroversion, Nuance Enjoyer on suicide watch:

Just lie by omission and torture the data to get the results you want so you can prove the inkwells wrong bro!

So, a couple of days ago I've learned of the existence of yet another hereditarian, genes-explain-all-group-differences rightwinger, who for some completely incomprehensible reason has decided that genetic determinism applies to everything except sex, romance and relationships (not lookism in...

incels.is

And, in the second model, attractiveness being one of the few variables with positive effects, along with female gender and social class, while most of the others are negative. The world is a fucking theme park if you're an attractive, upper-class woman.

Thoughts? @GeckoBus @DarkStar @Stupid Clown @reveries @Mortis @Regenerator @Sloth.Belgrade @Ron.Belgrade @LeFrenchCel @Man @decafincel @comradespiderman29

Noooooooo this is just because of benevolent sexism due to patriarchy you silly inkwell!!!

Fucking no wonder men off themselves up to 5 times more, despite being 5 times mentally stronger than foids.
Its insane how besides looks and status absolutely nothing fucking matters in life, ESPECIALLY if you were born the wrong gender You can get anything you want if you have those two, and if you don't have any of it you won't get shit. You don't get to receive sympathy, shit, you won't even get your problems simply ACKNOWLEDGED despite the overwhelming evidence.

The anti-male bias in people's brains is in-fucking-sane brocels. I try to always keep that in mind and never help out normies or foids anymore, unless I directly gain something from it (like a lot of inkies, I'm a former people pleaser)