Experiment Theres more numbers from 0 to 1 than full numbers from 1 to Ꝏ (In theory)

[Betrayed]

Since you can always put another ",01" after 0,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. The amount of decimals between 0 and 1 is Ꝏ
But the amount from 1 to Ꝏ is exactly Ꝏ-1, since Ꝏ is from 0 to eternity
But eternity is eternal, so we can always put another number on top of eternity

Thats why we need theoretical numbers

Practical numbers:
1
2
3
4
5
etc.
*highest countable number*

*the gap*

Theoretical numbers:
Ꝏ-2
Ꝏ-1
Ꝏ
Ꝏ+1
Ꝏ+2
etc.
Ꝏ*Ꝏ

we could also close the gap between practical numbers and theoretical numbers by doing the following
1 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-1)
2 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-2)

 

[Sheldor]

Since you can always put another ",01" after 0,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. The amount of decimals between 0 and 1 is Ꝏ
But the amount from 1 to Ꝏ is exactly Ꝏ-1, since Ꝏ is from 0 to eternity
But eternity is eternal, so we can always put another number on top of eternity

Thats why we need theoretical numbers

Practical numbers:
1
2
3
4
5
etc.
*highest countable number*

*the gap*

Theoretical numbers:
Ꝏ-2
Ꝏ-1
Ꝏ
Ꝏ+1
Ꝏ+2
etc.
Ꝏ*Ꝏ

we could also close the gap between practical numbers and theoretical numbers by doing the following
1 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-1)
2 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-2)

A Brocel interested in higher mathematics. A rarity on our habitat. I like it.

 

[PLA1092]

My IQ is too low to fully grasp your thread; I will bump it, regardless...

I see both as infinite; forever continuing, as is our subhumanity.

 

[allDead]

My basedness is infinite

 

[absolute penguin]

All that math and you still have 0 lays

 

[Doctor Eggman]

Since you can always put another ",01" after 0,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. The amount of decimals between 0 and 1 is Ꝏ
But the amount from 1 to Ꝏ is exactly Ꝏ-1, since Ꝏ is from 0 to eternity
But eternity is eternal, so we can always put another number on top of eternity

Thats why we need theoretical numbers

Practical numbers:
1
2
3
4
5
etc.
*highest countable number*

*the gap*

Theoretical numbers:
Ꝏ-2
Ꝏ-1
Ꝏ
Ꝏ+1
Ꝏ+2
etc.
Ꝏ*Ꝏ

we could also close the gap between practical numbers and theoretical numbers by doing the following
1 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-1)
2 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-2)

Since it is impossible to 1-1 each scenario here, which is the usual case when comparing infinities, I don't think either is larger. There is an infinite number of zeros that can be placed after the decimal point, and also an infinite number of whole numbers.

 

[NirvanaFan1988]

I just fucking hate math, kys math nigger

 

[trying to ascend]

Since you can always put another ",01" after 0,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. The amount of decimals between 0 and 1 is Ꝏ
But the amount from 1 to Ꝏ is exactly Ꝏ-1, since Ꝏ is from 0 to eternity
But eternity is eternal, so we can always put another number on top of eternity

Thats why we need theoretical numbers

Practical numbers:
1
2
3
4
5
etc.
*highest countable number*

*the gap*

Theoretical numbers:
Ꝏ-2
Ꝏ-1
Ꝏ
Ꝏ+1
Ꝏ+2
etc.
Ꝏ*Ꝏ

we could also close the gap between practical numbers and theoretical numbers by doing the following
1 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-1)
2 = Ꝏ-(Ꝏ-2)

Infinity minus infinity is undefined.

Infinity minuts any number is equal to infinity, so that's not how you determine whether one non finite set is smaller or bigger than other.

All those ''theoretical'' numbers are essentially just infinity

 

[PPEcel]

Georg Cantor's infinities I see.

I used to be a mathcel.