Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill There is factually no end to hypergamy (Study)

AdExpress

AdExpress

Captain
★★
Joined
Jun 18, 2025
Posts
1,674
Online time
3h 11m
Recent study in 2024 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padr.12643

The conclusion reads:

"Using census microdata spanning 105 birth cohorts in 16 countries, we demonstrate that, rather than declining, hypergamy has INCREASED in most countries over time and remains relatively stable across female educational advantage."

For reference:
Hypergamy - marrying someone of higher social/educational background
Homogamy - marring someone of equal social/educational background
Hypergomy - marrying someone of lower social/educational background
Female Advantage Index (FAI) - proportion of educated females relative to males

Over the duration of birth cohorts taken from this study the Female Advantage Index has increased by a considerable margin, meaning there are more much more educated women and therefore more women in jobs. A normal hypothesis would be as the FAI increases, aka as women are more educated, the rate of hypergamy would decrease as there are a lesser number of men more educated than women to do hypergamy with. Right?

1754487192332


NOPE. Focus on the red line specifically, which is the rate of hypergamy amongst couples where one is already earning more/of higher social class. The rate of women becoming more rich, and then marrying MORE MEN who are RICHER has INCREASED!! EVEN THOUGH THE POOL IS SMALLER AND THE POOL OF POORER GUYS IS BIGGER. Female advantage should make hypergamy statistically harder, yet it's still persisting.

Even in countries where the red line does not notably increase, it stays the EXACT SAME despite women's FAI increasing, meaning the proportion of hypergamy is still increasing.

1754490269113


Again, focus on the red line, as the FAI increases the amount of men more educated than women decreases, yet the number stays completely FLAT. Which means LESS women are doing even MORE hypergamy TODAY. Think of it like this:

4 x 6 = 24
If i reduce 4 to 3, the number of times 3 will have to add itself to get to 24 will have to increase from 6 to 8
3 x 8 = 24

The same amount of hypergamy is being done (24), but with less potential pairings available (4 to 3) due to more educated women relative to men than before, so they are doing it even MORE often to compensate (6 to 8). Insane.


1754488487391


And for the the rise in the orange line in the orignal first graph (hypogamy), not the one directly above, it's just the demographic inevitability since women outnumber educated men, not a sign that women are suddenly desiring to “marry down.” Women in Latin America today are not only more educated than women in the 1920s, but more educated than men today, infact for the past 30 years. So the orange line only compensates for the decrease in equal marriages which is the blue line (homogamy).


Women have literally found it harder to do hypergamy and yet still manage to do it more than they did 100 years ago when they need a richer guy for survival a lot more somehow. You have to understand just how much they dislike the concept of not dating someone they think aren't 10 levels above them to be able to do this. And the reality is, as study proves, this is only going to get worse as shit progresses, since women's FAI is ever increasing. Soon we'll have fully fledged harems controlled by the top 10% financially and physically if they don't exist already which will doom even average men. In short it never began
 

Attachments

  • 1754488442421.png
    1754488442421.png
    404 KB · Views: 54
  • 1754488477278.png
    1754488477278.png
    78.5 KB · Views: 82
and this isn't even factoring looks :feelskek::feelskek:
 
Love this study since there seemed to be a small trend of hypergamy-denying studies recently, this one seems to have put a stop to that:feelsjuice:. Though I'd still like to see this being replicated in other parts of the world.
 
They will push it until it reaches its pragmatic limit. This is what happens when you give the sexual selector more autonomy without consequences.
 
They will push it until it reaches its pragmatic limit. This is what happens when you give the sexual selector more autonomy without consequences.
Yep but everyone's scared of upsetting them to the point they're willing to let the country die out so it'll continue unfortunately
 
Though I'd still like to see this being replicated in other parts of the world.
Latin America is probably the most sexually free continent in the world everyone starts hooking up at like 12
 
They will push it until it reaches its pragmatic limit. This is what happens when you give the sexual selector more autonomy without consequences.
It just pisses me the fuck off that because of this collective foid-ego, the simps, and the corrupt govt, we have to let the snake eat its own tail. After that, bad times fall upon the whole population. Consequently, in the end, as a man, you're bound to suffer whether it be in "good" times or bad.
 
it should be noted this definition of hypergamy is purely financial, and doesn't really mesh with the manosphere definition
much like the official definition of "personal success" is purely financial now, and male outcast introverts are considered to be "successful" later in life if they eventually earn a good salary, ignoring all other factors

but yeah, it keeps going up and it's not letting up for one simple reason, a lot less women are marrying, so if they do marry you better believe they are going to engage in some insanely advantageous pairing, and won't bother with anything else, you can increase hypergamy by either increasing the amount of hypergamous women or decreasing the amount of non-hypergamous women
 
Hypergamy is only getting worse too
 
Hypergamy is only getting worse too
yep that's the thread it's gonna just keep going unlike what some copers have said
 
and this isn't even factoring looks :feelskek::feelskek:
Late to this thread, but yep. If only we were able to get a study of faces when it comes to looks. Guarantee there would be a hypERgamy in that too. Only things we can use is measurements and pERcentages cuz that's objective (e.g. height, dick size, body fat percentage, body width ratios, male pattERn baldness, etc.) whERe as looks it's much more complicated, you can still tell whether someone is chad sub5 and normie, but when it comes to studies, its tricky + its at that stage where the jews would not allow such studies because face is the only thing that mattERs when it comes to seeing if the woman is attractive or not so they will white knight and cuck up.
 

Similar threads

Eternatus
Replies
43
Views
901
Eternatus
Eternatus
Ricecel Sungnodius
Replies
3
Views
508
FoidsEnshittifyAll
FoidsEnshittifyAll
kevkon
Replies
4
Views
534
kevkon
kevkon
M
Serious Short men
Replies
6
Views
831
Cosmicsdorito
Cosmicsdorito
SlayerSlayer
Replies
21
Views
837
Chud Norris72
Chud Norris72

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top