It's not like human beings didn't succeed at surpassing natural craves in many cases, and since we live in a generation were contradictory values are held, and liking the ugly is a thing since Middle Age (Baroque as an artistical movement, for example, treasured ugliness in works), then it's possible that there are people out there who could date us, not as a settlement, but in truthful love. And that's considering only physical looks, I'm convinced people who value mind over matter exist.
You see, the blackpill IS true inasmuch you assume the existence of superficial people, which is empirically provable in dating apps, for example, but it isn't correct to generalize. You may argue that, if such people exist, they are outliers, which implies the norm are superficial human beings, which is true because being an homo sapiens doesn't mean you can employ humanity at all - in fact, 90%+ of people can't. However the concept of humanity is to VANQUISH shackles that ground our existence to nature craveness, hence the progress of technology, so people who care exclusively or majorly to looks are outliers of humanity. THEY are not human, and to believe they are the only kind that exists is to fall for THEIR game, to which us, as ugly people, cannot win.
tl;dr people who don't care for looks at all exist, and being against the idea gets you closer to the people you criticize for being inhuman since it's the same as being against humanity.