Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy The world's greatest hypocrisy:

EcstasyCel

EcstasyCel

Rejected with Police Force
-
Joined
Jul 1, 2025
Posts
2,536
Online time
10h 44m
The greatest irony of neurotypical modern SOYciety is the fact that teenage pregnancy has been virtually stamped out across nearly all demographic groups, ESPECIALLY whites, with how taboo it became to find teenage girls attractive, despite all of the overwhelming scientific evidence clearly stating it as normal.

At the same time neurotypicals (and autists in denial) DESPISE autistic people so much that they take pleasure in our pain and suffering living in a world designed to exclude us.

The irony is that older parents are FAR more likely to give birth to autistic children, while teenagers are more likely to give birth to healthy children, especially older teens. So basically neurotypicals despise us autists while at the same time creating the perfect environment that causes us to have these issues.
 
I suppose having children in your 20s is the best. Sometimes I wish I could have them but I know I never will.
 
I suppose having children in your 20s is the best. Sometimes I wish I could have them but I know I never will.
Nope, age 20 maybe, not age 29, that's already very sub-optimal.
 
It's over for me I guess.
Why should an age where a large percentage of men already have receding hairlines, greying facial hair and unhealthily high body fat have the most ideal genes to pass on? Doubt it man...
 
Why should an age where a large percentage of men already have receding hairlines, greying facial hair and unhealthily high body fat have the most ideal genes to pass on? Doubt it man...
Aren't genes themselves unaffacted by aging? I know a guy and a girl whose parents had them in their 40s and they look quite above average in all domains.
 
Aren't genes themselves unaffacted by aging? I know a guy and a girl whose parents had them in their 40s and they look quite above average in all domains.
Cherrypicking, statistically pure luck.

And yes, mutational load increases with age, causing more deleterious mutations that end up causing children to be born ugly and disabled.
 
Cherrypicking, statistically pure luck.

And yes, mutational load increases with age, causing more deleterious mutations that end up causing children to be born ugly and disabled.
What about the number of previous children? Does that affect it?
 
What about the number of previous children? Does that affect it?
Not sure, but with cats it does make a difference if an older cat had kitten previously or not.
 

Similar threads

cathuluelitist
Replies
4
Views
613
cathuluelitist
cathuluelitist
FarangInDaNang
Replies
16
Views
533
nihilum
nihilum
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
5
Views
811
RobertGarnicasAPedo
RobertGarnicasAPedo
FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
34
Views
867
Izayacel
Izayacel
Giracel
Replies
32
Views
2K
EcstasyCel
EcstasyCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top