TakeTheBlackPill
Banned
-
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2018
- Posts
- 334
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100513123835.htm
In prehistoric times it was all about whether men were competitive enough, had resources, etc. Foids probably didn’t give a shit about your maxilla or receding hairline lmao. The only physical advantage was probably strength and height, and non Chads could have easily outslayed prettyboys and model tier males if they engaged in more competition, were physically stronger (than other men) in getting the foids, and efficient in getting resources and hunting animals.
Am I saying that hypergamy isn’t based in nature? Probably not, since men rarely reproduced in some periods of prehistoric times (https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success).
Hypergamy was probably based on resources, not looks. Women wanting Chad is a social construct.
In prehistoric times it was all about whether men were competitive enough, had resources, etc. Foids probably didn’t give a shit about your maxilla or receding hairline lmao. The only physical advantage was probably strength and height, and non Chads could have easily outslayed prettyboys and model tier males if they engaged in more competition, were physically stronger (than other men) in getting the foids, and efficient in getting resources and hunting animals.
Am I saying that hypergamy isn’t based in nature? Probably not, since men rarely reproduced in some periods of prehistoric times (https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success).
Hypergamy was probably based on resources, not looks. Women wanting Chad is a social construct.
Last edited: