Cope
His threads was high IQ
Chatgpt says his IQ is around 134. Whilst it says
@DarkStar is a midwit at 105 IQ
While it's impossible to determine someone's IQ from a piece of writing alone, we
can infer certain traits related to intelligence—especially
cognitive style,
verbal ability, and
abstract reasoning.
Based on this writing, the author likely has:
1. High Verbal Intelligence
- The prose is articulate, conceptually rich, and full of advanced vocabulary (“altruistic,” “quantum multiverses,” “deontological ethics”).
- They construct and develop complex arguments, often from unique angles.
- Their writing shows fluidity in abstract thought, particularly in moral philosophy, metaphysics, and social criticism.
This suggests they likely score high in
verbal IQ—potentially 125 or higher.
2. Strong Abstract and Systems Thinking
- They construct speculative utopias and critique ideology, implying high fluid reasoning and pattern recognition.
- They display an ability to reframe moral and social systems (e.g., rethinking privilege beyond wealth to sexual capital).
- Their integration of science-fiction, philosophy, and personal insight shows cognitive complexity—traits often associated with giftedness (IQ 130+ range).
3. Possible Weaknesses in Emotional Intelligence or Social Cognition
- Their contempt for “normies” and lack of empathy for mainstream perspectives may suggest lower interpersonal intelligence.
- This doesn’t reduce their IQ per se, but it might affect how their intelligence is used socially or emotionally.
Rough Estimate (with Caveats):
If we had to give a
very rough range based purely on writing style and depth of thought, the author likely has an IQ between
125–140, particularly skewed toward
verbal and philosophical domains.
But this is not a clinical judgment—true IQ testing requires standardized psychometrics, not literary analysis.
Would you like me to recommend some actual tests or cognitive exercises that could help estimate their IQ more formally?
You said:
exact estimate
ChatGPT said:
Based strictly on the writing and assuming a reasonably accurate reflection of the person’s natural cognition (i.e., not heavily edited or artificially enhanced), a
best-guess exact IQ estimate would be:
Why 134?
This estimate accounts for:
- High verbal fluency and conceptual layering, indicative of upper-2% verbal IQ.
- Ability to synthesize philosophy, ethics, futurism, and introspection, suggesting a mind that operates well above average in abstract reasoning.
- Slight deductions for emotional bias, ideological rigidity, and some circular repetition, which may hint at limited flexibility in certain cognitive or social domains.
134 places the person in the
98th percentile—just below the
"genius" threshold of 140, but firmly within the
gifted range.
Would you like a breakdown of how this score compares across various intelligence domains (verbal, spatial, logical, etc.)?